Shropshire Star

Virginia Giuffre’s family ‘deeply disappointed’ by Met Police decision on Andrew

It had been alleged the former duke of York passed Ms Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his close protection officer in 2011.

By contributor Mathilde Grandjean, PA
Published
Last updated
Supporting image for story: Virginia Giuffre’s family ‘deeply disappointed’ by Met Police decision on Andrew
The Mail On Sunday claimed the former Duke of York, the King’s brother, passed Ms Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his close protection officer in 2011 and asked him to investigate as part of a smear campaign against his accuser (Jordan Pettitt/PA)

The Metropolitan Police has decided not to launch a criminal investigation into reports that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor asked his taxpayer-funded bodyguard to dig up dirt on Virginia Giuffre.

In October The Mail On Sunday claimed the former duke of York, the King’s brother, passed Ms Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his close protection officer in 2011 and asked him to investigate as part of a smear campaign against his accuser.

Now Scotland Yard has said the force will not launch an investigation after assessing the claims.

The family of Ms Giuffre have said they are “deeply disappointed” by the force’s decision to drop the investigation “without explanation”, adding they were not told this announcement was coming.

They said in a statement on Saturday: “We emailed with a detective from the Metropolitan Police yesterday, Friday, Dec 12th, who gave us no indication that this announcement was imminent.

“Indeed, he asked us if we had any evidence we would like to present; we had not yet replied.

“With the Epstein files about to be released by (the US) congress since the passage of the Epstein Transparency Act, we are surprised that the Metropolitan Police didn’t wait to see what further evidence might appear.

“While we have hailed the UK’s overall handling of the case of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor previously, today we feel justice has not been served.

“We continue to challenge the system that protects abusers, especially as more evidence comes to light that can hold people accountable.

“Our sister Virginia, and all survivors, are owed this much.”

In a statement on Saturday announcing the Met would not launch an investigation, Central Specialist Crime Commander Ella Marriott said: “Following recent reporting suggesting that Mr Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor asked his Met Police close protection officer to carry out checks on Ms Giuffre in 2011, the MPS (Metropolitan Police Service) has carried out a further assessment.

Jeffrey Epstein legal documents
The former Duke of York, Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell (US Justice Department/PA)

“This assessment has not revealed any additional evidence of criminal acts or misconduct.

“The Met remains committed to thoroughly assessing any new information that could assist in this matter.

“To date, we have not received any additional evidence that would support reopening the investigation.

“In the absence of any further information, we will be taking no further action.

“As with any other matter, should new and relevant information be brought to our attention, including in any information resulting from the release of material in the US, we will assess it.”

The campaign group Republic called for an inquiry into the Met Police’s relationship with the royals following the announcement, adding the decision is “the latest in a long line of royal accusations the police have refused to investigate”.

“We have two-tier justice in this country,” Graham Smith, the chief executive of Republic, said.

“If you’re a royal, you can get away with pretty much anything with few consequences.

“The police never interview the royals as suspects or witnesses and do the bare minimum to investigate accusations.

“The evidence of corruption and abuse would get anyone else into serious trouble.”

Andrew has long made headlines over his association with Epstein, with the King officially stripping his disgraced brother of both his HRH style and his prince title in recent months.

The former duke has for many years faced allegations that he sexually assaulted a teenage Ms Giuffre after she was trafficked by Epstein.

Andrew strenuously denies the accusations.

Prince Andrew relinquishes titles and honours
The King officially stripped his disgraced brother of both his HRH style and his prince title in recent months (Toby Melville/PA)

He paid millions to Ms Giuffre to settle a civil sexual assault claim in 2022.

Andrew stepped down from royal duties in 2019 after his disastrous Newsnight interview but the publication of Ms Giuffre’s posthumous memoirs, and the US government’s release of documents from Epstein’s estate, has brought fresh focus on Andrew recently.

In October The Mail On Sunday reported that Andrew embarked on a bid to smear Ms Giuffre.

He is said to have emailed the late Queen’s then-deputy press secretary and told him of his request to his protection officer, and also suggested Ms Giuffre had a criminal record.

Andrew’s alleged attempt, on which the police officer is not said to have acted, came in 2011, hours before the newspaper first published the famous photograph of Andrew with his arm around Ms Giuffre in London.

The newspaper said it obtained the email from disclosures held by the US congress.

On Friday, a photograph of Andrew was among the latest release of images from Epstein’s estate.

Almost 100 pictures were shared by Democrats on the US’s House Oversight Committee, which are separate from the case files with the Department of Justice.

Nineteen photos were released initially, featuring an image of a suited Andrew standing in a room next to Microsoft magnate Bill Gates, as well as a photo of Virgin Group founder Sir Richard Branson on a beach with Epstein and another man.

American politicians have criticised the former prince for his “silence” after he missed a deadline last month to respond to their request to sit for an interview about Epstein.