Letters: Andy Burnham, defence spending and Shifnal's 20mph limit – plus a 147 break


Readers share their views on Andy Burnham, defence spending and calls for wider 20mph limits in Shifnal
Burnham bounce will be mere blip
Over recent weeks, Andy Burnham has been providing glimpses of his envisioned premiership. He has publicly attributed Britain's economic difficulties to the 1980s, advocating a return to the era of extensive state control, three-day workweeks, strikes, and the prevalence of union influence.
It appears that Mr Burnham intends to resurrect the narrative of conflict between oppressor and victim characteristic of traditional socialism. He does not present himself as a decisive leader; instead, he has announced plans to increase government expenditure. Simultaneously, he suggests concern about the nation’s fragile fiscal position. Since the Labour Party assumed power, approximately £80 billion in additional taxes have been imposed, none of which were included in their manifesto.
Current borrowing levels exceed those during Liz Truss’s tenure; thus, claims about her economic record should be dismissed. The bond markets, which purchase our debt, are raising borrowing costs, and the United Kingdom remains the most exposed G7 nation to these increases. The situation is significantly worse than during the 1976 financial crisis, when an IMF bailout was necessary. Mr Burnham demonstrates limited economic understanding; he appears primarily as a political figure lacking substantive policy proposals. Instead of presenting concrete commitments to bondholders regarding the country's fiscal strategy, he relies on vague assertions. The opposition benches in Parliament also fail to demonstrate meaningful alternatives, appearing largely content to be rid of Sir Keir Starmer.
Such a trajectory is detrimental to the nation's stability. The United Kingdom's debt growth rate is surpassed only by Botswana, an emerging African economy with more justification for borrowing. The current economic environment is characterised by excessive regulation and prohibitive costs, which hinder business activity and result in weak production and sluggish growth. The country faces structural challenges; without decisive action, economic stability will remain elusive. A significant credit crunch akin to that of 1976 could potentially dislodge this ineffective Labour government and prevent further erosion of confidence. To be rid of Labour, however, that is a price worth paying sooner or later; those chickens will be home to roost, and Burnham's bounce will be a mere blip on the charts.
Martin Bristow, Midlands
Defence is no laughing matter
Yes, we may laugh but it's not funny. They actually believe it. In PMQs, we had Burnham telling us that welfare spending is more important than defence. The bulk of the Left actually believe this. Does it perhaps not occur to these idiots that without protection from the armed forces, there would be no one to lavish welfare spending on?
To repeat myself once more, defence is the national equivalent of fully comprehensive insurance on your car.
A M Etheridge, Midlands
Make Shifnal a 20mph town
I live in Shifnal, a small Shropshire town where the council have implemented a half-hearted attempt of a 20 mph zone in the town centre. This has been partly successful but needs to extended to include school and residential areas. Let Shifnal become England's first 20 mph small town.
Peter Hassall, Shifnal
- You can enjoy other pictures from the past and more with our weekly FREE Nostalgia Newsletter - with scores of archive pictures and exclusive features on the history of Shropshire and Mid Wales - all sent to your inbox every week. Sign up here.
Have an opinion? We want to hear from you.
Share your views by writing to Readers’ Letters at [email protected].
Letters to the editor must include the writer’s name and address. Letters will only be published anonymously in exceptional circumstances. The editor reserves the right to edit letters for length, clarity or style.
Do you have a picture from the past to share?
We would love to hear from you. Whether you have an old photograph, need help identifying a street or recognise a familiar face, send your images to [email protected].
Please include your name, where you are from and as much information as possible about the photograph. We will publish as many as we can online and in print.
Comment Guidelines
Iconic Media encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.