Chief executive of trust Simon Wright outlines vision for future Shropshire's hospitals

Simon Wright, chief executive of Shropshire and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, has set out his vision for the future of healthcare planning across the county.

Trust boss Simon Wright said the only way to ensure sound NHS services remain in the county is to close one of its two A&E units
Trust boss Simon Wright

Much has been said over the past few weeks about our hospital services.

It is natural, when there is talk of reconfiguring hospital services, for there to be a level of concern. But I believe it is really important to respond to any deliberately misleading comments and to those that obstruct attempts to provide a better service.

We need, collectively, to find a way through the differences of opinion and maintain a focus on what will give us the best results for patients.

To provide a better service, hospitals must not stand still; they must continually transform. For too long, our local NHS system has been caught in a gridlock that obstructed change. Staff at the hospitals – our doctors, nurses, other clinicians and support functions including management – were unable to progress their clinically-led ideas for improving patient care. Over time, this has led to a number of services becoming over-stretched.

Now we are tackling those issues head-on.

The NHS employs one in 20 workers in the UK. SaTH is made up of more than 5,500 people.

These people – our brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, friends, neighbours – these are the ones whose dedication, kindness and care are saving and renewing the NHS.

They have delivered amazing outcomes with kind and compassionate care these past 12 months in the face of the most challenging winter in decades.

A small population does not produce enough patients to keep a particular specialist up-to-date. A reasonable sized hospital trust needs to serve about half a million people if it is to have the right breadth of specialist cover and to keep a good proportion of specialist services local.

For this reason, the people of Shropshire, Telford & Wrekin and Mid Wales all need each other if they are to have a hospital trust in their geographic area.

Nonetheless, as we said over 18 months ago, it does make sense to keep two hospitals in the two major towns. The task is, therefore, to make one organisation work across two sites, in a way that reduces unnecessary duplication and encourages strength in depth. The answer is to have different centres of excellence on each site.

The centres of excellence approach should save us from slowly leaking services out of our county. If we get it right we may ensure services such as neurology, radiotherapy and vascular do not begin the next avalanche of services sucked into the larger cities.

While we wait for consultation on how this model might work, SaTH has continued to work hard to improve the existing approach. In the last 12 months we have recruited more than 180 additional permanent clinical staff and spent substantial sums on temporary staff to meet growth in patient demand.

We have invested over £500,000 in the A&E department at the Princess Royal Hospital and in a range of state-of-the-art equipment. We are committed to providing the best healthcare possible for all of the people we serve.

   

We are waiting for consultation on the new approach through the NHS Future Fit programme. This is part of the process to ensure the suggested clinical model is tested from all sides, particularly from the public’s point of view.

Our preferred clinical option is for a Planned Care Site at the Princess Royal Hospital in Telford (PRH), with the Emergency Centre at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (RSH).

Both hospitals would have a new Accident and Urgent Care Centre, which would manage medical illness and minor injuries, paediatrics and other ailments. This represents the majority of cases we see in our current A&Es today.

These centres would be supported by extended nurse practitioners, GPs and telemedicine support from our Emergency Centre doctors 24/7. Separating planned from unplanned care should mean a huge reduction in cancelled operations, better control of infection, and a better opportunity for specialists to offer the right care at the right time when people need it most. PRH would have 350 beds, centres of excellence in diabetes, bariatric surgery, imaging and diagnostics and elective surgery. Education and learning would be focused through a new Leadership Academy and Transforming Care Institute. Local outpatients would remain, as would fracture clinics.

We would keep a Women and Children’s Centre at PRH with breast services centralising there. Seven out of 10 women’s and children’s episodes of care would still be delivered locally, with specialist emergency paediatric care taking advantage of the greater depth of expertise at the Emergency Centre in RSH. Almost all outpatient antenatal and postnatal care would still be provided at Princess Royal Hospital or through midwifery-led services delivered at home or in the community. We would build a new cancer unit at PRH to deliver chemotherapy and holistic treatments, counselling and support.

We already see ambulance patients travelling out of county and to stop this from increasing we must create an Emergency Centre to provide the safest care for our most unwell people.

While our hospitals would both change, they would emerge safer and stronger. Our people would get the facilities they deserve to deliver the safest and kindest care possible to all of our families. The hospitals are not political footballs. We need them more now than at any time we can remember.

We need to see the NHS Future Fit programme move to public consultation this summer. We need our staff and patients’ voices to be heard. We need to move forward. Please don’t let this slip through our fingers – we need your help to make this a reality. Stand together with our staff and help us to build a better future for everyone.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Comments for: "Chief executive of trust Simon Wright outlines vision for future Shropshire's hospitals"

johnfrederick

It would help if Simon Wright stopped tell fairy Tales and tell the People of Shropshire that this nothing more than cost cutting and services and hospital are beds are to cut ? They are trying to better care in place with out talking to the People ? With better care their is lack of funding and lack of planning plus shropshire council which is partner in it have not got a clue what it means ?

pete

Telford & Wrekin Corbynista Council should be ashamed of their politicking.

.......................Bless.

Roger

"Both hospitals would have a new Accident and Urgent Care Centre, which would manage medical illness and minor injuries, paediatrics and other ailments. This represents the majority of cases we see in our current A&Es today.

These centres would be supported by extended nurse practitioners, GPs and telemedicine support from our Emergency Centre doctors 24/7."

This is the first suggestion that the Urgent Care Centre in Telford would not be Doctor Led. The 80% of A&E cases currently dealt with in A&E are done so in Doctor led units. Not cunsultant led but Doctor led. Without Doctors the % of acses dealt with in Telford must go down and Shrewsbury up. Telemedicine can help with certain aspects but not all. The £ 500K ectention at Telford was eveidently on different plan because they wont be needed on the current plan unless they not telling us something. That somethink might be closing Bridgnorth UCC and diverting the patients to Telford .

Obviously there is no clear understanding of the future of the Community Hospitals , their UCCs and Maternity units. This is central to the needs of of a very large part of the catchment.

We need to establish how health care in communities and neighbourhoods is delivered before we know whats left for the hospitals.. If there is insufficient capacity in the communities the Hospital plan can not work. We can only shift work to the communities when they are able to absorb it. There is no community hospital in Telford so every GP practice must be a UCC and birthing unit or Telford must house the community hospital role. In Shropshire it's the other way round Shrewsbury is too far to go for stitch or simple x-ray. Community hospitals need to be the collective resources of GPs and Mid Wives. Beds for short term illness where the virtual ward is unsupportable, for instance the elderly living alone. They don't need an acute hospital they need a community bed for a few days. The virtual ward might be very dodgy on infection control. Homes are not as clean as hospital wards and children mix in schools to spread infections, infestations and diseases that all end up in the home. Fit people can resist but the ill are susceptible..

Try our beta site!

We’re getting ready to launch our brand new website for shropshirestar.com and we’d like to give you a sneak preview.

We’re still applying the finishing touches, so please bear with us if something’s not quite right.

We'd love to hear your thoughts, good or bad, via the simple feedback button that you'll see to the right side of every page.

Try the beta