Wolves player ratings: Subs make big impact in late win
We rate the players after Wolves claim late victory at Sheffield United.
JOSE SA
His handling is becoming a real concern. Got away with dropping the ball twice in the second half. Needs to sharpen up.
Drops 5
JACKSON TCHATCHOUA
Showed some character after what can’t have been an easy week. A long way from perfect but he kept battling away.
Fighting 5
NASSER DJIGA
In the right place to cut out a dangerous cross in the first half and also won several big headers. Brought off with what looked like an injury.
Steady 7
LADISLAV KREJCI
Fortunate to escape a second yellow after dragging down Peck. Still finding his feet after missing the start to the season.
Mixed 5
HUGO BUENO
The pick of the Wolves backline. Looked to get forward well and showed some composure on the ball.
Bright 7
MARSHALL MUNETSI
Missed Wolves’ best chance of the match before the goal when he shot straight at Cooper in the first half. Plenty of workrate, little quality.
Struggled 5
ANDRE
This felt a step forward. Looked better once Wolves had made the changes in the second half and played his part in the goal.
Solid 7
RODRIGO GOMES
Lively early on and his deliveries into the box in the first half caused problems, setting up Munetsi’s chance. Less effective in the second half.
Faded 6
FER LOPEZ
His quietest match of the season. Regularly dropped into the right-back position to receive the ball and could find no way through the home defence.
Frustrated 5
MATEUS MANE
Unlucky not to earn Wolves a penalty early in the second half when his flick hit the hand of McGuinness. Some lively moments.
Moments 6
ADAM ARMSTRONG
There could be no faulting the workrate, yet he does not have the same presence up front as Jimenez. Guilty of dropping too deep.
Peripheral 6
SUBSTITUTES
Jordan James 6 (for Munetsi, 63), Raul Jimenez 7 (for Gomes, 63), Kieran Trippier 7 (for Tchatchoua, 70), Tommy Doyle 7 (for Lopez, 70), Toti 7 (for Djiga, 70) Subs not used: Konan, Neave, Traore, Virginia (gk).
Comment Guidelines
Iconic Media encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.
