Liam Keen's Wolves player ratings v Manchester City as two get 5/10
Liam Keen rates the Wolves players on their performance following the defeat to Manchester City.


Jose Sa - 6
The goalkeeper had very little to do all evening and was not at fault for the goal. His distribution was largely error-free.
Nelson Semedo - 6
The captain looked after possession well and tried to get forward and join the attack when possible.
Matt Doherty - 6
Doherty had a good game overall but let Doku get past him too easily for the City goal.
Emmanuel Agbadou - 7
A solid display from the man mountain defender, who looked very comfortable dealing with City's attacking players.
Toti Gomes - 7
Toti made several crucial tackles and interceptions, particularly at the end of the first half when Wolves were struggling.
Rayan Ait-Nouri - 6
The wing-back started the game by losing possession too often, but he did get into dangerous positions and caused problems. He was unlucky not to score.
Andre - 6
Andre was the best player on the pitch for 30 minutes but when gave the ball away needlessly in midfield that lead to the City goal.
Joao Gomes - 5
J.Gomes did not look his usual self at the Etihad. He looked tired and struggled to keep up with the pace of the game.
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde - 5
Bellegarde fluffed a golden chance to go ahead and then lost his way, losing possession consistently, before being taken off.
Marshall Munetsi - 6
The winter signing was full of running and energy, but lacked a little bit of the final third quality when called upon.
Matheus Cunha - 6
Cunha started the game brightly and tried to make something happen throughout, but was isolated without Larsen.
Substitutes
Rodrigo Gomes (for Doherty, 66), 6, Pablo Sarabia (for Bellegarde, 66), 6, Goncalo Guedes (for Andre, 80), Santi Bueno (for Semedo, 86), Hwang Hee-chan (for Cunha, 86).
Subs not used: Bentley, Djiga, Lima, Doyle.
Comment Guidelines
Iconic Media encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.
