Shropshire Star

Display of David statue raises art or censorship debate at world’s fair in Dubai

A 3D replica of Michelangelo’s David stands tall at Italy’s pavilion.

Published
A 3D reproduction of Michelangelo’s David

One of the most talked about attractions at the world’s fair in Dubai is a towering statue made of marble dust that is raising eyebrows just as the original did more than 500 years ago.

At Italy’s pavilion, a 3D replica of Michelangelo’s David stands tall, his gaze intense and defiant.

For most visitors though, the head of the statue is all they will see as they tour the pavilion. Only VIPs with special access will be able to catch a view of the statue from head to toe while it is on display for the next six months at Expo 2020 in the United Arab Emirates.

The original David is nude and some visitors see the limited view offered as a form of artistic censorship. Others say the way David is displayed at the Expo is a form of artistic expression.

“It is no coincidence that David is not seen from the bottom to the top, as it normally is, but it welcomes people by looking at them in the face,” said David Rampello, the director of art at the Italian pavilion.

An art historian in Rome said choosing who can view the statue in full and who cannot creates a hierarchy.

“What the rich, the great and the good can see and what the ordinary folk can see shouldn’t be two different things,” said Professor Paul Gwynne, who teaches medieval and renaissance studies at the American University of Rome.

It took a team of Italian experts 40 hours of digital scanning to create the replica, made with what organisers describe as one of the world’s largest 3D printers. Artists used filaments from recycled plastic material, then a mix of resins and marble dust to create it.

A 3D reproduction of Michelangelo’s David
A 3D reproduction of Michelangelo’s David (Kamran Jebreili/AP)

At its home in Florence since 1873, the original David draws gasps from onlookers to this day. Michelangelo’s mastery and his passion for human anatomy, from the contracted muscles of David’s abdomen to the flexing of his right thigh muscles, make the piece unforgettable for those looking up at the towering work of art.

In Dubai, those details get lost. David stands in the centre of a narrow octagonal shaft, presented from his chest up and surrounded by replicas of Roman columns. Visitors in the public area can see parts of David’s torso if they lean over a railing.

The decision drew the ire of a La Repubblica reporter writing on Expo’s opening.

“Why can’t you see the whole body of the biblical hero, because you only see the head, the magnetic eyes staring at you silently? And where is the rest?” an article in the daily newspaper read, at one point referring to David’s “beheading”.

David’s nudity has been part of a centuries-old debate about art pushing boundaries and the rules of censorship. In the 1500s, metal fig leaves covered the genitals of statues such as David when the Roman Catholic Church deemed nudity as immodest and obscene.

Visitors take photos of the 3D reproduction of Michelangelo’s David
Visitors take photos of the 3D reproduction of Michelangelo’s David (Kamran Jebreili/AP)

Controversy also erupted in 2016 when officials erected wooden panels to shield nude statues at Rome’s Capitoline Museums during a visit by Iran’s then-president Hassan Rouhani. That spurred some politicians to accuse the government of caving in to “cultural submission” though Mr Rouhani himself thanked Italians as being “ very hospitable people” when asked about the gesture.

In the wider United Arab Emirates, a few nude artworks can be seen at the Louvre Abu Dhabi, though the museum largely caters to more conservative pieces.

Expo visitor Calli Schmitz, from Germany, said she did not think the way the replica was displayed at the Expo did it much justice.

“I think it was not as exposed as it should have been,” she said. “I think because of the gold everywhere, people did not really realise it was the statue of David.”

Italian visitor Ricardo Mantarano offered another take.

“It’s a different way of approaching the same sculpture and putting it in another perspective,” he said.

Dinara Aksyanova, a 31-year-old visitor from Moscow, however, was not as forgiving.

“Why was it only half? It makes no sense,” she said. “The most interesting part is underneath.”

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.