Shropshire Star

Shrewsbury homes set for nod despite objections

Plans for 18 affordable homes in a village have been recommended for approval – despite strong objections from the parish council.

Published
Shropshire Council's base, Shirehall

Severnside Housing wants to build the homes off Mount Close in Pontesbury, near Shrewsbury.

Pontesbury Parish Council said the homes would have an adverse impact on the landscape and would not be sustainable.

However Shropshire Council is recommending its Central Planning Committee gives the plans the green light at a meeting at Shirehall next Thursday.

New road

Shannon Franklin, planning case officer, said: “The application seeks planning permission for the erection of 18 affordable dwellings and all associated works as a rural exception site immediately adjacent to the settlement boundary of Pontesbury.

“The proposal seeks to provide four one-bedroomed bungalows, two two-bedroomed bungalows, eight two-bedroomed houses and four three-bedroomed houses all accessed via a new road adjoining the existing Mount Close to the north.

“The application site is located to the southern edge of the village of Pontesbury, a village extending either side of the A448, located 11.3km to the south west of Shrewsbury, 5.4k km south-east of Hanwood and Hanwood Bank and 2.6km north-east of Minsterley.

“The site lies outside the Shropshire Hills Area of Outstanding Natural beauty, the nearest boundary of which is 630m to the south-east of the site.

“Pontesbury contains a variety of services and facilities including primary and secondary schools, shops, restaurants and doctors.

“The site currently occupies a grassed field used for agriculture. The field is regular in shape and orientated on a slight north-east-south-west access.

“The sites boundaries to all four sides are formed of established field hedges with some mature trees located along the south-eastern edge.

“The access to the site is via a field gate to the north-east boundary onto Mount Close.

“A second field gate in the sites southern most corner leads into the subsequent agricultural field to the south west.”

'Not sustainable'

In its objection, Pontesbury Parish Council said the site was not sustainable and would have an adverse effect on the landscape.

Its letter said: “The previous application and planning inspector’s report emphasised that development on this site was not sustainable and there is no evidence in the present application to override this.

“The parish council supports more affordable homes but this is an unsuitable location."

By Andrew Morris, Local Democracy Reporter