Comment: Councils cashing in on poor motorists
When the first Coalition Transport Secretary got the job he declared: “We will end the war on motorists.”
That was Philip Hammond. He stayed in the job 17 months – something of a record for a transport minister – before becoming Defence Secretary and being replaced by Justine Greening.
She’s so busy worrying about Heathrow Airport, the West Coast Main Line and the high-speed train from London to Birmingham she may not even have noticed the war is about to break out again.
Motorists will be under the cosh once more when the Government hands over new powers to local councils outside London to impose fines for a range of petty misdemeanours.
In 2004, London councils won the right to fine motorists for offences like driving in a bus lane or encroaching on a yellow box.
And what fun they have had ever since. Drivers in London coughed up £50 million in fines last year alone as 800,000 of them fell foul of the council transport snoops. Please note, that doesn’t include the £300 million they make in parking fines.
Now greedy councils up and down the country think they can boost their tax-raising activities by whacking new £60 fines on unsuspecting drivers.
It’s a nice little earner, especially when some mistakes are induced by the confusion caused by the councils themselves when they tinker with the road system.
In two-miles of Birmingham road, for instance, there are three stretches of bus lane. One is out of bounds to cars all day, another until 9am, the third to 10am.
Confused? You will be when you fall foul of the council CCTV and get a nasty little letter in the post demanding money with menaces.
It is true some drivers – not you and me, obviously – are a menace to other road-users and we’d all be happier if they were priced off the roads.
But I wouldn’t trust the average local council to discriminate between really abominable, inconsiderate, selfish so-and-sos and the rest of us.
This is just a money-making exercise, another way of raising taxes. Already the terrible 20 councils are talking to companies selling number recognition cameras. This will all be justified in the name of road safety but in reality the unblinking eye of the CCTV camera will track your every manoeuvre and minor mistake.

Mr Hammond may have declared a truce in the Government’s war on motorists but that hasn’t stopped councils from pursuing the fight with all the resources at their disposal.
One of the obvious results is that we are wary of driving in and out of town or city centres. If we need to go shopping, it’s cheaper and wiser to try somewhere out of town.
So, on the one hand, councils wring their hands about the decline in traditional shopping areas while, on the other, councils hasten their demise by making life miserable for motorists.
Why bother to drive into a town centre when you can buy what you want out of town in a shopping area where they don’t charge you for parking – let alone fine you a fortune for over-staying your welcome?
And why run the risk of falling foul of a bus lane or a yellow-box junction when you know the Big Brother is itching to land you with a £60 shopping tax?
Giving councils more power would be a disaster. It will just drive out economic activity – shoppers, workers, businesses, anyone who could steer clear of these predators would do so.
Of course, one excuse for all this is that the councils want to force us out of our cars and onto public transport.
They claim it’s greener and we’ve all got to do our bit to reverse global warming (you know, the sort of climate change which – they keep warning us – will lead to long, hot, dry summers when the only thing that will grow in the garden is the occasional cactus).
They refuse to accept that, for many people, public transport is simply impractical and, for many more, it’s more trouble than it’s worth.
This time the Government will be waging a proxy war through local councils. Strangely, 12 of the 20 local authorities on the list of those demanding new powers are run by the Labour Party: Birmingham, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, Plymouth, Reading, Salford, Sheffield, Southampton and Oxford.
Of the others, Lib-Dems run Bristol, Cambridge, Portsmouth and Bath and South East Somerset while the Greens run Brighton.
Only three Tory councils want to pursue this vendetta: Southend on Sea, Guildford and Canterbury.
Yet a Conservative-led Government is happy to encourage these money-grabbing authorities down the path of self-destruction.
It is reassuring to see that local authorities in Shropshire are not showing any signs of wanting these powers.
But be warned: The Department for Transport has written to all councils in Britain inviting them to leap on the bandwagon too.
I can’t help thinking this is a policy in urgent need of an immediate U-turn, even if it’s in violation of the Green Cross Code.
Comments for: "Comment: Councils cashing in on poor motorists"
Roger
Can we fine the council for introducing traffic lights which cause delays, modernise others to make them cause more delay, plant bollards in the middle of merge lanes, introduce traffic calming that rips out your sump. Place new panda crossings 50 yards apart and place a panda crossing on a paint island.
Do they understand that traffic calming means slowing down traffic to generate traffic jams or causing people to speed to get into a gap before it closes.
Only the other day we had the report on the infamous Smithfield Road bollards stating that it should have calmed traffic (jam cars back into town causing grid lock) reduce accidents( they increased) allow pedestrians to cross the road( there is nowhere to go, only 1 building between pedestrian controlled lights) all delayed because the report was required after the council admitted failure but one or two people didn't like it. But they are still there.
I think that one more such folly may finish off town centre trading all together and if fines are threatened that will finish the town off. The council have created a culture of every man for him self if you want to drive in town so they should not be punishing their victims.
I don't think this council will go for it anyway, not before they have set up a method of privatising the function and giving away the income. It would be out of character.
Bill
Surely it is better to penalise those who seek to break the rules or claim an unfair travel advantage rather than to increase other charges (especially parking).
Having had two close encounters of the unpleasant kind with selfish rule-flouting motorists in Telford in the past few months I'd be happy to see a better enforcement of the proper standards of road conduct.
steve
Birmingam rated 25th out of 26 cities for walking and cycling, thats not helping the poorest in society who cant afford cars. Cost of motoring has gone down in relative terms by a massive margin over the last 10 years. Now thats the real issue.
Andy
It's about time they brought in these powers and fined motorists. It's the only way most of them will learn the Highway Code!