Leader: Batting for Britain, but what is the next step?
Friday 9th December 2011, 12:35PM GMT.
Today David Cameron showed he has some backbone.
Caught between a rock and a hard place, he did what British voters and British MPs expect him to do – which is bat for Britain.
Although he is talking tough, the reality is that he had little option unless he was to limp back with a standard European fudge and then become a discredited Prime Minister in the eyes of his largely Eurosceptic backbenchers.
At best, he would have faced ridicule on all sides. At worst, there would have been an outright rebellion.
He has nailed his colours to the mast and they are the colours of the Union flag, not the European flag.
Having exercised the British veto, he has left his clubmates in the European club hopping up and down.
It is the perfidious Albion of the Thatcher era all over again. But who brought us to this pretty pass in the first place? It was the ideologists and dreamers who promoted the euro, which has proven to be a misconceived project, bringing together the industrial powerhouses of Europe’s northern rim with Mediterranean economies with basket case tax regimes in a doomed marriage.
So keen were the visionaries on this road map to full political and economic union that they even allowed in Greece.
President Sarkozy can whine and thump the table all he likes, but he is one of the architects of the disaster which was founded on a collective burying of heads in the sand.
The euro has been put to the test by the economic storm and has spectacularly proven not to be fit for purpose.
However, so much has been invested in it, both politically and financially, that it cannot be allowed to fail.
There is now a new European landscape, a sort of two-tier Europe comprising those who are in, and those who are out. The European Union has been transformed into that most awkward of beasts, a pushmi-pullyu.
By choosing to be out, Britain now faces the prospect of years of being given the cold shoulder and being unable to influence events by being at “the heart of Europe”.
Some people will ask whether, if Britain is now to have a peripheral role and be treated as some sort of black sheep, the time has come to reassess whether being part of the European club is in Britain’s interests.
David Cameron has taken a step closer to the door.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

Backbone f’sure, but no lips.
Report abuse
Cameron is playing party politics,he is more interested in placating his eurosceptics than saving the euro,batting for britain my —-.
Report abuse
David Cameron has backbone?
Is he going to let us have a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU then?
Report abuse
He didn’t bat for Britain (or, more correctly, the UK), he batted for one square mile of it.
Report abuse
James,
Absolutely. He has shown quite clearly that he is only interested in protecting and serving his friends in the financial services industry, who also happen to provide more than 50% of the Tory party’s funding. Well there’s a surprise!
I’ve seen some commentators laughingly referring to this as him exercising a ‘veto’!
He didn’t – he simply took his ball home because those nasty people in Europe just wanted to place some constraints on his friends in the City and actually make them pay a little extra in tax to get us out of the hole they put us in!
That oaf Farage was banging on on the radio yesterday about the ‘referendum we were promised’ – we weren’t! There was only ever to have been a referendum if the proposed European Constitution had gone ahead – and it didn’t.
Cameron’s pathetic appeasement may well have boosted the morale of his and George’s rich mates in the City, but at a time when the world’s economies are all at the mercy of the greed of the international bond markets, it was an act of betrayal to Britain’s manufacturing industries, the leaders of which are already expressing grave concerns about these isolationist policies.
This is sheer, self-serving recklessness, which all but Cameron’s rich mates will live to regret.
Report abuse
Epic fail from the Cameron regime
Report abuse
Quite agree with comments 1-4.
The 2nd paragraph of the lead article says it all. He had little choice. Personally, I would say he had NO choice.
Report abuse
The article states “The euro has been put to the test by the economic storm and has spectacularly proven not to be fit for purpose”.
The whole concept of the European union is not fit for purpose!
Report abuse