Rallying call to save Royal British Legion clubs
- Today's leader
Three Shropshire constituencies to change under boundary review
Tuesday 13th September 2011, 11:50AM BST.
Three of Shropshire’s five parliamentary constituencies will change under new plans which have been drawn up by the Boundary Commission for England, it was revealed today.
Only the North Shropshire and Shrewsbury and Atcham borders are unaffected by the proposals, which could be implemented before the next General Election in 2015.
If the plans are approved, Ludlow will be changed to Ludlow and Leominster. Telford’s two seats will be redrawn to become Telford North and The Wrekin, and Telford South and Bridgnorth. Shrewsbury and Atcham will be renamed ‘Shrewsbury’.
There are no proposals to alter the boundaries of the Montgomeryshire constituency, but the Boundary Commission for Wales has yet to publish its proposals.
The proposals are yet to be ratified and a 12-week consultation will now take place, starting today.
The Boundary Commission has been tasked with reducing the number of K Parliamentary seats from 650 to 600.
It is expected to publish any revisions on new constituency boundaries next autumn 2012 with the final determination of boundaries by September 30 2013.
Today the two Shropshire MPs whose constituency boundaries will not change said they were pleased their areas would be unaffected.
But the three MPs whose constituencies may change were lukewarm.
The proposed new Ludlow and Leominster constituency will be one of the largest in the UK covering a massive area of 2,350 square kilometres.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

Cannot beleive Telford is not recognised for its community ties and the borough as a whole. Its gerrymandering not open transparent recognition. Telford is a grwoing town and should not be split, what do bridgnorth have in common with woodside and how would the links be maintained.
Report abuse
BOTH residents of Atcham will be furious about this!
Report abuse
Keep Atcham in the name!!
Report abuse
And how does your neighbour feel about this?
Report abuse
He’s on holiday at the moment in far-off Rodington. I’ll ask him when he gets back. Don’t imagine he’d be happy. I mean, what’s the world coming to?
Report abuse
My MP for South Herefordshire (Jesse Norman)is disgruntled, as am I, that deepest darkest South Hereford, including Ewyas Harold and the Golden Valley, is being merged in with Church Stretton! It is very important we keep these County identities! I know they want to even out the numbers but at what cost?
Report abuse
Tory, tory, tory! No Labour MPs for Shropshire then?! Disgrace!
Report abuse
good way to keep shropshire blue, viva la conservative party bye bye socialist telfordian scummers
Report abuse
Thank you little boy blue for reminding me once again why I’m glad to live in Telford.
PS – I bet you’re looking forward to the day when the caps key arrives in the more backward areas of the county!
Report abuse
With people losing jobs as a result of the present economic climate, MPs should be no exception. The whole thing is a cost-cutting exercise and most companies have had to do the same kind of reorganisation, so in a way it’s welcome. Why so much protest?
But what does it matter about number of voters in the constituency? If you gain more votes than the next chap, you win, no matter how many voters there are. In a fanciful constituency with three voters, if you gain two of them, you win.
Report abuse
How many voters in a constituency matters because some MPs have had far fewer than others, hence they represent fewer people overall but they have the same voting rights of course. It has worked out that it was Labour MPs who needed fewer votes from a lower number of voters to win a seat hence there was an inbuilt bias toward Labour. I have not looked at the details of this present shuffle but suspect it will attempt rebalance the system to remove the Labour bias.
It is unfortunate that they have decided to get rid of only 50 seats, with most of our laws now being made in the EU I would have thought they could have dispensed with many more, generally downsizing is what happens when most of the work has been outsourced.
Report abuse
everywhere being gerrymandered just happens to include Labour MP’s – so north shropshie and shrewsbury are untouched but the Labour vote in Telford is split in two, same in London and Birmingham, its gerrymandering plain and simple, its corruption by the government MP’s simples. I would expect them to advantage themselves of course but the problem is by doing this, it just means as soon as they are hoofed out, the next Labour government will do the same to advantage themselves in return. So the cycle of corruption will be ongoing. Not good for people or politics in general.
Report abuse
OH that’s a little naughty, but very well worked out .As pointed out you will be very lucky to have anything other than Tory as an mp in Shropshire. This is what people say when the vote they cast makes not one bit of difference , all of Shropshire will be one big safe Tory seat . All lib dems will have to move to the bottom of the country all labour to the baron north . Although the nice highlands of Scotland are not to bad either where you will have a Scottish parliament, good health service and free everything else.
Report abuse
“As pointed out you will be very lucky to have anything other than Tory as an mp in Shropshire … all of Shropshire will be one big safe Tory seat!
Could that possibly be because more people voted for them than the other candidates?
Report abuse
possibly yes, bet a few thousand are regretting it now though;)
Report abuse
The original term for manipulating ward/constituency boundaries to benefit one particular party was “gerrymandering” (as the first constituency so produced, to the advantage of a Governor Gerry, resembled the shape of a salamander).
The new Bridgnorth & South Telford seat looks a silhouette of an elephant’s head, with an extremely long trunk (which will no doubt come in useful for sucking from the expenses trough).
Report abuse
gets rid of mps so must be a good thing
Report abuse
#7
With people losing jobs as a result of the present economic climate, MPs should be no exception. The whole thing is a cost-cutting exercise and most companies have had to do the same kind of reorganisation, so in a way it’s welcome. Why so much protest?
Proably because it will not actually save us any money R Suppards!
Look at the unitary option, promising a huge cut in councillors then promptly doubling their allowances when it came in.
Report abuse
Why not have one mp for Telford town and one for surrounding rural areas and smaller towns? That would seem to make more sense than dividing it in half.
Report abuse
how dare the boundaries commission tinker with county boundaries. ludlow and leominster certainly not. the b/comm. are doing the same thing in a new constituency twixt cornwall and devon. ther county boundary is the river tamar and they want to link bude in cornwall with bideford in north devon . the natives are restless.
please rethink the north hereford south shropshire seat, and surely telford is big enough for its own seat
if i had any say i would have 4 seats, shrewsbury and atcham, telford, north shropshire and south shropshire. personally i would be sorry to lose mark prichard as an mp. he has backbone and an unusual tory mp from a council estate.
Report abuse
Shropshire has an electorate that calculates to 4.5 constituencies. However the boundary commission do it, there will have to be one cross-county seat. I actually think a Shropshire-Herefordshire seat is the best option in such circumstances as the two counties are very similar.
Report abuse
Giz me seat back !!!
Report abuse
how can you have part shrop part herefordshire in one seat, i know its tory tory tory, but its bloody stupid look at the trouble they had when they merged hereford last time, few years ago but caused ructions then, wy are we putting up with all this messing around, its the same down here in bedfordshire, they are building a new town just up the way from us its just a few miles from bedford its self so stupid, also a centre parks, and trying for a waste incinerator
Report abuse