Three Shropshire constituencies to change under boundary review

Tuesday 13th September 2011, 11:50AM BST.

Three Shropshire constituencies to change under boundary review

Three of Shropshire’s five parliamentary constituencies will change under new plans which have been drawn up by the Boundary Commission for England, it was revealed today.

Only the North Shropshire and Shrewsbury and Atcham borders are unaffected by the proposals, which could be implemented before the next General Election in 2015.

If the plans are approved, Ludlow will be changed to Ludlow and Leominster. Telford’s two seats will be redrawn to become Telford North and The Wrekin, and Telford South and Bridgnorth. Shrewsbury and Atcham will be renamed ‘Shrewsbury’.

There are no proposals to alter the boundaries of the Montgomeryshire constituency, but the Boundary Commission for Wales has yet to publish its proposals.

The proposals are yet to be ratified and a 12-week consultation will now take place, starting today.

The Boundary Commission has been tasked with reducing the number of K Parliamentary seats from 650 to 600.

It is expected to publish any revisions on new constituency boundaries next autumn 2012 with the final determination of boundaries by September 30 2013.

Today the two Shropshire MPs whose constituency boundaries will not change said they were pleased their areas would be unaffected.

But the three MPs whose constituencies may change were lukewarm.

The proposed new Ludlow and Leominster constituency will be one of the largest in the UK covering a massive area of 2,350 square kilometres.

Changes – click here


  1. 1
    Samuel

    Cannot beleive Telford is not recognised for its community ties and the borough as a whole. Its gerrymandering not open transparent recognition. Telford is a grwoing town and should not be split, what do bridgnorth have in common with woodside and how would the links be maintained.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Monkey

    BOTH residents of Atcham will be furious about this!

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    David

    Keep Atcham in the name!!

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Roger Williams

    My MP for South Herefordshire (Jesse Norman)is disgruntled, as am I, that deepest darkest South Hereford, including Ewyas Harold and the Golden Valley, is being merged in with Church Stretton! It is very important we keep these County identities! I know they want to even out the numbers but at what cost?

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Jo

    Tory, tory, tory! No Labour MPs for Shropshire then?! Disgrace!

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    blue boy

    good way to keep shropshire blue, viva la conservative party bye bye socialist telfordian scummers

    Report abuse

    • Rob, Telford

      Thank you little boy blue for reminding me once again why I’m glad to live in Telford.

      PS – I bet you’re looking forward to the day when the caps key arrives in the more backward areas of the county!

      Report abuse

  7. 7
    R Suppards

    With people losing jobs as a result of the present economic climate, MPs should be no exception. The whole thing is a cost-cutting exercise and most companies have had to do the same kind of reorganisation, so in a way it’s welcome. Why so much protest?

    But what does it matter about number of voters in the constituency? If you gain more votes than the next chap, you win, no matter how many voters there are. In a fanciful constituency with three voters, if you gain two of them, you win.

    Report abuse

    • Ken Adams

      How many voters in a constituency matters because some MPs have had far fewer than others, hence they represent fewer people overall but they have the same voting rights of course. It has worked out that it was Labour MPs who needed fewer votes from a lower number of voters to win a seat hence there was an inbuilt bias toward Labour. I have not looked at the details of this present shuffle but suspect it will attempt rebalance the system to remove the Labour bias.

      It is unfortunate that they have decided to get rid of only 50 seats, with most of our laws now being made in the EU I would have thought they could have dispensed with many more, generally downsizing is what happens when most of the work has been outsourced.

      Report abuse

  8. 8
    Liam

    everywhere being gerrymandered just happens to include Labour MP’s – so north shropshie and shrewsbury are untouched but the Labour vote in Telford is split in two, same in London and Birmingham, its gerrymandering plain and simple, its corruption by the government MP’s simples. I would expect them to advantage themselves of course but the problem is by doing this, it just means as soon as they are hoofed out, the next Labour government will do the same to advantage themselves in return. So the cycle of corruption will be ongoing. Not good for people or politics in general.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    ANDREW FINCH

    OH that’s a little naughty, but very well worked out .As pointed out you will be very lucky to have anything other than Tory as an mp in Shropshire. This is what people say when the vote they cast makes not one bit of difference , all of Shropshire will be one big safe Tory seat . All lib dems will have to move to the bottom of the country all labour to the baron north . Although the nice highlands of Scotland are not to bad either where you will have a Scottish parliament, good health service and free everything else.

    Report abuse

    • R Suppards

      “As pointed out you will be very lucky to have anything other than Tory as an mp in Shropshire … all of Shropshire will be one big safe Tory seat!

      Could that possibly be because more people voted for them than the other candidates?

      Report abuse

  10. 10
    Rob, Telford

    The original term for manipulating ward/constituency boundaries to benefit one particular party was “gerrymandering” (as the first constituency so produced, to the advantage of a Governor Gerry, resembled the shape of a salamander).

    The new Bridgnorth & South Telford seat looks a silhouette of an elephant’s head, with an extremely long trunk (which will no doubt come in useful for sucking from the expenses trough).

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    bob

    gets rid of mps so must be a good thing

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    eva land

    #7
    With people losing jobs as a result of the present economic climate, MPs should be no exception. The whole thing is a cost-cutting exercise and most companies have had to do the same kind of reorganisation, so in a way it’s welcome. Why so much protest?

    Proably because it will not actually save us any money R Suppards!

    Look at the unitary option, promising a huge cut in councillors then promptly doubling their allowances when it came in.

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    Matthew

    Why not have one mp for Telford town and one for surrounding rural areas and smaller towns? That would seem to make more sense than dividing it in half.

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    atcham jack

    how dare the boundaries commission tinker with county boundaries. ludlow and leominster certainly not. the b/comm. are doing the same thing in a new constituency twixt cornwall and devon. ther county boundary is the river tamar and they want to link bude in cornwall with bideford in north devon . the natives are restless.

    please rethink the north hereford south shropshire seat, and surely telford is big enough for its own seat

    if i had any say i would have 4 seats, shrewsbury and atcham, telford, north shropshire and south shropshire. personally i would be sorry to lose mark prichard as an mp. he has backbone and an unusual tory mp from a council estate.

    Report abuse

    • Henry

      Shropshire has an electorate that calculates to 4.5 constituencies. However the boundary commission do it, there will have to be one cross-county seat. I actually think a Shropshire-Herefordshire seat is the best option in such circumstances as the two counties are very similar.

      Report abuse

  15. 15
    Gerry Mander

    Giz me seat back !!!

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    Judi Nester

    how can you have part shrop part herefordshire in one seat, i know its tory tory tory, but its bloody stupid look at the trouble they had when they merged hereford last time, few years ago but caused ructions then, wy are we putting up with all this messing around, its the same down here in bedfordshire, they are building a new town just up the way from us its just a few miles from bedford its self so stupid, also a centre parks, and trying for a waste incinerator

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.