Wrekin mining protesters in concrete threat

Thursday 9th June 2011, 10:33AM BST.

Can’t see video? Update Adobe Flash Player
Video may take a moment to load. Return to Video Index

Protesters battling against developers mining coal at a Shropshire beauty spot today warned they would be prepared to encase themselves in concrete to stop bulldozers flattening their makeshift camp.

Campaigners have been on-site for more than a year at Huntington Lane, Little Wenlock, Telford, where UK Coal started operations to mine 900,000 tonnes, and they have issued a rallying call to carry on the fight.

As diggers get closer and closer to the camp, protestors warned UK Coal that the battle was far from over.

Campaigner Suzie Murphy said: “They’re not going to take our land, we’re going to fight for it.

“Our defences are ready.

“We are prepared to cover ourselves in cement, we have food, and there’s other things I can’t disclose.

“It is drastic but there’s so many beautiful things in the ancient woodland here, like caves and springs, and they want to destroy it.

“When the call-out goes there will be lots of people here.

“There are people here who are prepared to be arrested.”

The campsite, which has about 20 residents, was set up at the site in a bid to fight the plans, despite them being granted full planning permission.

Protesters have built huts, tree houses, a kitchen and other living quarters and have lived at the site throughout the winter.

Tunnels have also been dug around the site in a further attempt to stop the diggers driving onto the land.

Ms Murphy added: “They want to bulldoze the camp and use it as the haulage road.

“We’re just waiting for them to try and come through.

“They’ve already tried to enter the camp but we stopped them through the community and wildlife act because birds were nesting.

“The camp hasn’t been served with an eviction notice yet.”

The campsite protest began in March 2010 after UK Coal appealed when Telford & Wrekin Council failed to come to a decision over its application.

“We want more local support, I think people are scared to come on site because they think they will be arrested for trespassing,” said Ms Murphy.

“We get people from all walks of life down here, solicitors, doctors, nurses, support workers, families.

“There’s no reason why people should be scared,” she said.

“The energy here is so full of love.”

By Paul Mannion


  1. 1
    Peter

    Idiots.

    If they want to self-harm let them do it. I’m sure that a digger could gently move any ‘concrete blockheads’ out of the way fairly easily.

    If they happen to kill themselves in carrying out such reckless acts, they’ll clearly be no great loss to the gene pool…

    Report abuse

    • Murphy Suzy

      we do not self harm, you self harm by being part of society, your life is an illusion because you think you have control, a reckless act is driving a car. its clear you share one brain cell with the rest of jo public, therefore that makes you a very low part of the animal kingdom, pity is what i feel for you.

      Report abuse

    • Murphy Suzy

      come and have a chat, or maybe you fancy a game of mind chess?

      Report abuse

  2. 2
    Andy

    These protestors obviously have no jobs and contribute nothing to society so I would be all for them concreting themselves in…

    then just mine through them.

    Report abuse

    • Murphy Suzy

      you obviously did not read the article, try again, some have jobs, the rest claim nothing and live from the land. happy living!

      Report abuse

  3. 3
    helpful

    remember one shovel cement to two sharp sand and three coarse aggregate

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Rob, Telford

    ….have they any idea just how much CO2 is produced in the making of concrete – surely they could just stick themselves to the trees with good old fashioned animal glue?

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    spencer

    Let them..

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    andrew finch

    I assume they do not mean encase any apart of the body? if they do that they will not be around to protest for a while.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    George @ Dawley

    Let them cover themselves in concrete, it will burn their skin off. Concrete burns are a major hazard and very dangerous so if they are that daft then good luck to them.

    There must be other ways of them protecting thier protect on the mine land or then again, maybe they should obey the law and move on.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Gringo

    Not the brightest idea they’ve had.

    Concrete causes severe burns if left in contact with the skin for long periods, even through clothing.

    I couldn’t imagine a more painful protest since a Tibetan monk set himself on fire!

    A re-think may be needed on that one Swampy.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Creed

    Shocked by some of the previous comments. Trying to protect the environment for future generations is surely a huge contribution to society.

    At least these guys will be able to hold their heads high and tell their grandchildren that they tried, even if they don’t succeed.

    Report abuse

    • twisting my melon

      ” at least these guys will be able to hold their heads high “. Not if its encased in concrete they won’t..

      Report abuse

    • spencer

      Hey Grandkids, I used to live illegally in a treehouse on someone elses land being ignored by everyone whilst claiming benefits because i felt it was saving the planet..

      They’ll be so proud..

      Report abuse

      • Rob, Telford

        …and we all used to sign on at Wellington Jobcentre….

        Report abuse

      • Huw Peach

        First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they send climate denialists to smear you, then …

        Margaret Mead: ‘Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.’

        Report abuse

  10. 10
    Jess

    You commenters are missing the point, they’re not against coal production or angry over CO2 production, they’re trying the preserve the Wrekin, which is both a beauty and historic spot and treasured by the community.

    Report abuse

    • Rob, Telford

      “they’re not against coal production or angry over CO2 production”

      THEY ARE – perhaps that’s why they call it the climate camp?

      Report abuse

    • twisting my melon

      nobody is mining on the Wrekin..

      Report abuse

      • Murphy Suzy

        i think maybe you need to think outside the box. try to stop being controlled by what you read, you do not have to be. i am a martial arts instructor, my friend is an anesthetist, we are campaigners, your judging is childish and silly and makes you look stupid.

        Report abuse

  11. 11
    Barry

    One thing makes me think they won’t do this…if they’re encapsulated in concrete how will they get to the benefits office to claim?

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    steve

    I hope when you return back to everyday life, you won`t be using any electric that could of been generated by coal, Like buildswas power station..come on guys get a grip you will never win!

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    bit grumpy

    WHY NOT TRY A REALLY HARD HITTING LEAFLET CAMPAIGN OR A MARCH ON PARLIMENT? SEEMS TO HAVE WORKED FOR OTHER PEOPLE IN THE PAST!! LOL

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    Silas

    Camp full of love?
    re – your article and spokesperson.
    Theyve started fighting amongst each other recently for “king of the Camp”*lol*
    I have heard that even those who have supported the Campaign against Uk Coal from day one, have had enough of those there and their antics, and have stopped all support for the camp – and accepted defeat, albeit at long last.
    Silas.

    Report abuse

    • Murphy Suzy

      o dear! lol. again come see for yourself, in all societies there are power struggles for control, in our environment everyone is king and queen, we give people a chance they soon fade away when they realize this is not what the camps here for, politics happen everywhere.

      Report abuse

  15. 15
    Huw Peach

    Do you think that coal-generated power should have a future, steve, when you bear in mind just how much CO2 it pumps out?

    Coal: 1,153 grammes of CO2 per kilowatt hour

    Gas: 428 grammes of CO2 per kilowatt hour

    Wind: 24 grammes of CO2 per kilowatt hour

    [Source: Öko-Institut (2007 figures)]

    On 30th May, the International Energy Agency (IEA) reported that worldwide CO2 emissions have increased 25% in just 10 years.

    In the year 2000, 23 gigatonnes of CO2 were being released in the world.

    In the year 2010, 30.6 gigatonnes of CO2 were released; an increase of 5% on 2008.

    To avoid dangerous climate change the world’s governments had previously committed to releasing no more than 32 gigatonnes of CO2 by 2020.

    Do you think we are likely to avoid 32 gigatonnes by 2020 if governments like the last Labour government continue to bulldoze projects like this through against the will of the locals?

    (See what Labour’s John Denham did: http://www.shropshirestar.com/latest/2009/10/07/mining-plans-get-minister-go-ahead/ )

    Maybe these brave protesters won’t win, steve, but they are sustaining a debate about our energy future, which others are keen to bury.

    And for that reason they deserve our support.

    Report abuse

    • James Hansen

      And what, exactly, Huw, is CO2′s part in this discussion? Because – as far as I can see from reading numerous articles – Mother Nature aint playing ball with any of the Climatologists models.

      Report abuse

      • Huw Peach

        Dave Jesse (campaigner in video): ‘It’s going to be a good campaign in terms of … delaying them [UK Coal] long enough … to make the point about coal and climate change.’ (Video time ref: 00.28 to 00.47)

        James Hansen, Director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, also discussed CO2′s part in this discussion in his largely unreported evidence to the trial of 20 eco-activists at the Ratcliffe coal power station just before Christmas last year.

        Point 4: ‘Coal was almost the only source of fossil fuel CO2 emissions until about 1920. CO2 emissions from oil accelerated rapidly after WW II, passing coal emissions in the early 1960s.’

        ‘Coal use accelerated in the past several years, and by 2009 global CO2 emissions from coal (43%) had shot past those of oil (38%), with gas at 19%.’

        ‘Given evidence that the world is approaching peak oil production, and the fact that recoverable resources of coal are much larger than those for oil, coal will surely become the dominant source of future atmospheric CO2, unless a conscious decision is made to limit emissions from coal.’

        Point 5: ‘It will be necessary to return atmospheric CO2 to 350 ppm or lower on a time scale of decades, not centuries, if we hope to avoid destabilization of the ice sheets, minimize species extinctions, and halt and reverse the many regional climate trends discussed above.’

        ‘There is just barely still time to accomplish that, but it requires an immediate moratorium on new coal-fired power plants that do not capture and sequester CO2 and as rapid as possible phase out of existing coal plants.’

        Point 7: ‘(2) Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels in 2008 were 40% higher than those in 1990.’

        ‘Over the past 30 years temperatures have increased at a rate of almost 0.2C per decade, in very good agreement with predictions based on greenhouse gas increases.’

        ‘Even over the past ten years, despite a decrease in solar forcing, the trend continues to be one of warming. Natural, short- term fluctuations are occurring as usual but there have been no significant changes in the underlying warming trend.’

        (5) ‘The UK is one of the nations most responsible for human-made CO2 in the air today, indeed, on a per capita basis it is the most responsible of all nations that are major emitters of CO2.’

        ‘This fact is recognized by developing countries, making it implausible that they would consider altering their plans for coal use if the UK plans to continue to rely on coal-fired power.’

        [Source: 'James Hansen's evidence to the Ratcliffe coal trial', Guardian, 14th December 2010]

        By the way if -as you (fake James Hansen) say- ‘Mother Nature aint playing ball with any of the Climatologists models’, how come 2010 was tied with 2005 as the hottest year ever recorded?

        Report abuse

  16. 16
    Y. Telford

    Like it “skin care by concrete” nice 1, oh & a bit of lime in it for the skin peal, why have i been buying mud pack’s for years!!!! OH I SEE it must be for there heads as there dose not seem to be much else in there:-))

    Report abuse

  17. 17
    Fred

    Substitute ‘protestor’ for ‘traveller’ and see how quickly the council would have had them moved on…get a life, get a job…

    Report abuse

  18. 18
    AC

    Regardless of their motives or lifestyle choices, these people are trying to stop a big corporation ruin a part of our countryside, destroying natural assets and industrial archeology for the sake of a relatively small volume of coal.

    You’re all lucky to live in a area where we have such beautiful places on our doorstep (although I concede that the camp is itself something of a blight)… lucky and thoroughly undeserving.

    Report abuse

  19. 20
    roadrunner

    I agree with AC. I thought that UK coal wasn’t supposed to touch the actual woodland but they must be if the people are camped in trees and are now going to be moved out. Is this a blatant case of saying one thing to get Planning permission and then riding roughshod over it?

    Report abuse

  20. 21
    andrew finch

    With regards some of the comments such as burns to the skin from the cement , that is a small part of it as the concrete hardens it will crush the body or body part encased within resulting in death.

    Report abuse

  21. 22
    z0la25

    Can we dump our concrete at the protesters site please? We have 40,000m3 from the Longbridge Works in Birmingham that we are paying a fortune to crush to aggregate, If they want enough to enclose themselves in or anything else the loonies choose to do with it we would be happy to oblige.

    Report abuse

    • Huw Peach

      Who are the ‘loonies’, z0la25?

      The people who want the truth about climate change to speed up our government’s transition away from coal to a low-carbon future?

      Or the -usually anonymous- people/ corporations who are fighting that truth, and desperately clinging on to an unsustainable status quo, whatever the consequences for their own grandchildren’s future?

      I think it was one of your ancestors, z0la25, who said: “The truth is on the march and nothing will stop it.”

      Report abuse

    • Huw Peach

      Who are the ‘loonies’, z0la25?

      The people who want the truth about climate change to speed up the transition away from coal to a low-carbon future?

      Or the -usually anonymous- people who are fighting that truth, whatever the consequences for their own grandchildren’s future?

      Report abuse

  22. 23
    F. Dibnah

    Its a novel way to get stoned

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.