Telford’s Labour winner axed by party
Monday 9th May 2011, 6:00PM BST.
TELFORD’S LABOUR party has axed its leader just two days after he led them to victory in the borough elections.
Keith Austin has been ousted as leader of Telford & Wrekin’s Labour group in favour of Kuldip Singh Sahota.
Councillor Sahota is now poised to become leader of Telford & Wrekin Council after he was voted in by colleagues at a meeting on Saturday.
Councillor Sahota today said: “It is a new challenge for me.
“I have been an opposition backbencher and have a wide range of experience, working on the council for the last 10 years and as a member of the police authority.
“There are quite a lot of new councillors in the Labour group and I am looking forward to working with them, sticking to my agenda and carrying out the mandate the people of the borough have given us.”
Councillor Austin, a councillor in Telford since 1981 and leader of the Labour group since 2004, said he was disappointed at losing the leadership but added: “When you are in a democratic organisation things like this happen.
“Everyone’s position is up for grabs after an election and that includes the leader’s.”
One of Councillor Sahota’s first acts as Labour leader was to vow to rent out offices being built as part of the town’s £250 million Southwater development which have been earmarked as the new headquarters for the authority.
Councillor Sahota said he and his Labour group would be checking to see if it was not too late to abandon plans by the council to move to the Southwater site.
He said if it was possible, the council would look outside of the town centre for new civic headquarters.
The previous Tory adminstration had wanted to move the council headquarters to Southwater following the sale to Asda of its existing Malinslee House base on the outskirts of the town centre. Councillor Sahota said: “We are going to draw up our budget in our first 100 days or less, if possible.
“That means scrutinising everything and seeing what can be restructured or re-timed to allow us to do it without borrowing large amounts of money.
“We currently have £190 million of debt and that will rise to about £277 million by 2012 under existing plans. Servicing that debt will cost taxpayers £3.5 million to £7 million in interest payments every year.
“We are looking at the new civic centre plan and want to know whether contracts have been signed or not. The only contract we know which has been signed is for ground preparation work on site. We will have to decide how we move ahead if we are contractually obliged to move to Southwater. We want to give best value to council taxpayers.
“If contracts have not been signed, we don’t want to move to Southwater but will rent the building out as it is a premium site and would attract a very good rent. The council would retain a presence in the town centre though so that people could still pay bills and get advice and help.”
Councillor Sahota added, in relation to Southwater, he wanted the council to work with the Southwater Event Groups and Hark Apollo and take the plans forward.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

It will be a challenge for everyone else, I am sure of that.
Report abuse
The night of the long knives is alive and well amongst Telford Labour Party
Report abuse
Well I didn’t vote for that!
Report abuse
A new Leader and a new direction, now the tories need to do exactly the same.
Report abuse
Austin out. Awesome news!
southwater scrapped – bad news!
Report abuse
Typical Labour party changing leaders after the election, giving you someone you didn’t vote for.
Report abuse
Surely if u voted for Keith it was to be your cllr for hadley and leegomery, the voting didn’t include the leadership.
Report abuse
Gee, that’s never happened before in the Telford Labour Party…
Report abuse
“If contracts have not been signed, we don’t want to move to Southwater but will rent the building out as it is a premium site and would attract a very good rent. The council would retain a presence in the town centre though so that people could still pay bills and get advice and help.”
Funny. I thought councillor Sahota lived in Telford, not Mars. For anyone to expect to attract a “very good rent” on a building in Telford during the present flat property market certainly has not been living on the same planet as the rest of us.
Report abuse
How can you trust a party that stabs its own leader in the back..
Report abuse
The leader of the Labour Group of councillors is elected annually at a meeting where all Labour councillors have a vote – obviously since the election there have been quite a few changes in the membership of the group, as well as additional members.
They’ve clearly decided that they want a change – it’s no different to any other group or organisation electing a new chairman – it happens all the time – hardly a stab in the back!
Report abuse
Hence the perfectly reasonable headline “Telford’s Labour winner axed by party”
Your comments seem to be contradicting your other statement Rob – but no surprise there
Report abuse
Spencer-
Can you name a party which doesn’t ‘stab its leaders in the back’?
Southwater is something telford needs. But for business, rather than council staff. I’d be very pleased if a suitable front end to council services was retained in the town centre, with the remainder of staff moved to wherever is cheapest.
Report abuse
So let’s get this straight: in less than a week, Labour have gone from “we will scrap Southwater and all plans to move the Council there” to “we’ll build it, but we won’t move in there ourselves, and instead will find somewhere else to move into”. Quite a climbdown from the rubbish in their leaflets.
This all smacks of cutting their nose off to spite their face if you ask me.
Report abuse
Oh, Zlatan. What a shock.
Mind you, normally it takes Labour a little longer than four days to go back on their word.
Report abuse
Et tu, Brute?
Report abuse
Ooh yet more anti-labour propaganda from the Star – Surprise!
Perhaps you could just run lots more irrelevant McCann stories to make up for the lack of quotes from your buddy Mr Eade!
Report abuse
I’ve just re-read this story in case I’d missed something – in what way is it “anti-Labour propaganda”? It seems like a perfectly reasonable piece of factual reporting to me, and my politics are definitely left of centre.
Report abuse
Nothing in the text that indicates it is anti-labour at all. How can fact be anything other than anti-fiction?
Think you’d better ask nurse for your medication early.
Report abuse
Perhaps you should read it again as I appreciate proof-reading isnt your strong point Rob! ;)
Report abuse
…I don’t know, at least I spotted your missing apostrophe in “isn’t”…
…but no surprise there, whoever you are…
Report abuse
what a stab in the back, he was a nice guy and he was a winner, what more do they want? politicians are really nasty people hey
Report abuse
“what a stab in the back, ”
What piffle. They have a meeting every year to elect a leader. Sometimes the same one gets in, sometimes they don’t. Just like thousands of other groups and organisations.
Calm down, dear :)
Report abuse
nasty politians
cant trust them
keith was a good guy he’s been treated very shoddily i feel
Report abuse