Teen beauty spot drinkers are ramblers, not rebels
- Dave Burrows
Shropshire region’s MP’s expenses revealed
Thursday 3rd February 2011, 7:45PM GMT.
Shropshire and Mid Wales MPs claimed a total of £23,343 in expenses during September and October 2010, figures revealed today.
Shrewsbury Conservative MP Daniel Kawczynski received £2,996, North Shropshire cabinet minister Owen Paterson £3,862, South Shropshire Tory Philip Dunne £2,941, Montgomeryshire Tory Glyn Davies £10,317, Labour’s Telford MP David Wright £2,851 and Wrekin Tory Mark Pritchard £376.
They were revealed in the latest list of claims announced by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority. Claims found to be in breach of the new rules and rejected nationally were being laid bare for the first time today.
And nationally there was fresh controversy as it began emerging that about 150 claims were turned down and another 100 were only partly reimbursed by officials.
The highest claimant for Shropshire and Mid Wales was Mr Davies, though he said the figure had been distorted by his need to find accommodation and set up an office as he was newly elected last year.
He said his claims were completely legitimate but he had submitted several receipts in one go, which had made his figure higher.
He added: “There were a number of claims for my rented accommodation in London, for council tax and for office expenses.
“When I was elected, I said that I would be happy for anyone to examine my claims at any time and that remains the case.”
Mr Davies’ claims included two amounts of £1,430 for rent, one claim of £1,388 for council tax, several expensive stationery claims including one for £469 and a bill of £3,877 for staffing. There was also a claim of £225 for a telephone bill.
Details of the latest claims – some 25,000 in total – for second home, travel, office and staff costs were being unveiled by Parliament’s new expenses watchdog on its website.
They are the second tranche of payments approved by the body set up to enforce tighter rules on MPs’ use of taxpayers’ cash in the wake of last year’s expenses scandal.
The first set of claims under the new rules were published in December and revealed MPs were paid £3.1 million in expenses in the first three-and-a-half months after the general election.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.


Can I ask why tax payers are paying for Mr Pritchard’s Television Licence. Surely he should be so busy that he doesn’t have time to watch the the telly, and should be listening to the radio whilst multi tasking. Perhaps I’ll ask my boss to pay my tv licence, as it’s obviously important research for my gardening job, to watch Gardeners World.
Report abuse
This is the TV Licence required at his flat he needs in London in order to do his job as an MP at Westminster. A perfectly acceptable expense claim.
Mr Pritchard obviously pays the TV Licence on his family home out of his own pocket.
Report abuse
So, some workers have claimed expenses from their employer. I am claiming mileage from my employer today. Would you like to put that on the front page?
Report abuse
Depends. Can you fax me the invoice?
Report abuse
:-)
Come on, Stephen.
This *is* a legitimate story and it is entirely proper that it be covered in the media.
There is a lot more public interest now in the expenses that MPs claim, especially since it seems likely that promises to reform the system extensively might well be ‘accidentally forgotten’ about, or at the least watered down, when Parliament thinks the public have more pressing worries on their hands. The MPs also have a platform on which they may wish to explain their claims, as Glyn Davies does. And his explanation is reasonable, I think.
And I agree with Salop Gardener. I’ve not a problem in general with expenses relating to an MPs duties. But I don’t see why I should pay for the tv licence of Mark Pritchard or any other MP.
Report abuse
Not only his TV license but also his HOME contents insurance? I know he only made two claims and took the least but neither of those should have been passed.
Report abuse