Shropshire and Mid Wales MPs claimed a total of £23,343 in expenses during September and October 2010, new figures revealed today.

Shrewsbury Conservative MP Daniel Kawczynski received £2,996, North Shropshire cabinet minister Owen Paterson £3,862, South Shropshire Tory Philip Dunne £2,941, Montgomeryshire Tory Glyn Davies £10,317, Labour’s Telford MP David Wright £2,851 and Wrekin Tory Mark Pritchard £376.

The totals were revealed in the latest list of claims announced by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority.

Claims found to be in breach of the new rules and rejected were being laid bare for the first time today.

And there was fresh controversy as it began emerging that around 150 claims were turned down and another 100 applications were only partly reimbursed by officials.

Details of the latest claims – some 25,000 in total – for second home, travel, office and staff costs were being unveiled by Parliament’s new expenses watchdog on its website.

They are the second tranche of payments approved by the body set up to enforce tighter rules on MPs’ use of taxpayers’ cash in the wake of last year’s expenses scandal.

The first set of claims under the new rules were published in December and revealed MPs were paid £3.1 million in expenses in the first three and a half months after the general election.

Ipsa today again refused to publish the individual receipts submitted by MPs to support their claims because it would be too expensive – despite warnings from critics it would mean the new system would still be open to the same abuse as the old one and further dent public confidence.

House of Commons authorities were forced to publish receipts after a long-running legal battle.

It was that detailed information which allowed some of the previous wrongdoing by MPs to be exposed in revelations which rocked Westminster.

But Ipsa did keep its pledge to make public rejected claims for expenses – after giving MPs and staff enough time to get used to the new system.

The latest disclosures were being unveiled as the watchdog continued its consultation on proposals including giving MPs with families more money for accommodation, and loosening restrictions in the longer term.

It follows fierce criticism from MPs from all parties who have condemned the “unnecessarily high costs and inadequacies” of the new system and called for the introduction of a “simpler” alternative.