‘You do better’ call over Telford Council budget cuts
Tuesday 4th January 2011, 7:01PM GMT.
Telford & Wrekin Council chiefs unveiled budget cuts – and then challenged opposition Labour councillors to come up with alternative plans before criticising their own.
The war of words broke out after the council’s Conservative administration revealed budget plans resulting from a cut of almost £19 million in funding over the next two years. The council’s cabinet will discuss the proposals next week.
The cuts could include overnight street lighting and concessionary travel.
Labour group leader Councillor Keith Austin had predicted the council would make “devastating cuts” to frontline services.
He had also said the cuts were coming at a time when he claimed tens of millions of pounds were being spent on “lavish” new civic offices.
Council leader Andrew Eade today called on Councillor Austin produce an alternative budget.
He said: “The Conservative administration has been working very hard over the past three years to put the council’s finances on a sound footing and has already reduced expenditure by more than £16 million while slashing council tax and increasing investment in regeneration schemes across the borough.
“The budget is critical to our future and, as the main opposition leader, Councillor Austin must shape up to his responsibilities.
“For the first time in more than three years, he must provide detailed budget alternatives to spell out whether he would continue the council’s substantial regeneration schemes across the borough while continuing to restructure the council to reduce costs.”
Councillor Austin said today: “We are calling for a proper briefing on the budget, something we haven’t had as yet. When we get that we will obviously consider alternatives.
“We will decide whether to put forward an alternative when we have considered the budget in detail.”
Council’s planned savings
- Extending the switching off of street lights in non-residential areas between midnight and 5am only (£61,000).
- Reducing repairs to street lights, roads and pavements and reducing traffic management schemes (£125,000)
- A review of transport services, including changes to subsidised bus services and Wrekin Connect (£362,000).
- Changing concessionary travel — offering only free bus travel from 9.30am, instead of from 9am (£184,000).
- Reducing shrub-bed maintenance and the regularity of grass cutting and road sweeping (£391,000).
- Removing recycling banks in places such as pub and supermarket car parks (£135,000).
- Reviewing charges for a small number of environmental services, including bulk collections and the council’s only two charging car parks at Ironbridge and next to the Town Park in Telford town centre. The maximum proposed increase would be 20p (£101,000).
- Review of school milk provision in primary schools by asking parents to opt-in to the scheme (£75,000).
By Simon Hardy
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

That’s interesting – why does moving recycling facilities from anywhere save them money? Surely they’re not paying a company to take the recycled waste in the first place?
Any council with a recycling officer who knows what they are doing would be generating revenue for the council by tendering out the service to the company prepared to PAY the highest amount to buy it and make money from it, not paying a company to take it away.
An easy example is paper. Paper gets sold to paper mills to make into new paper. Paper mills BUY it. So whoever sells it to them makes money. But to sell it in the first place, they have to acquire it. Normal business rules would assume that the council SELLS it rather than pay someone to take it away for them. Price goes up and down of course, but a decent negotiator will fix a contract price and hold the buyer to it.
(And please, nobody reply that mills have more than enough and won’t pay for any more. In that case, recycling is a waste of time as the paper gets sent to [China for] landfill. And that problem should fall to the company who negotiated to buy from the council, not the council itself.)
Recycled material = money and it makes no sense at all to pay someone to take money away.
No doubt the recycling managers got great GCSEs in environmental studies or whatever it takes to head up a council recycling strategy, but one suspects that their business negotiation skills leave a little to be desired.
Where there’s muck, there’s brass, lads!
Report abuse
With power comes responsibility – and it looks like the Tories don’t want that responsibility. They’re acting like children.
Report abuse
Really, Jayne? And there was me thinking that those acting like spoilt brats were the Labour Group.
“Wah! We should still be in power! Wah!” I’ll never forgive the Labour group for saying that Telford people were “too stupid” to recycle. Really, Jayne? How much is being recycled, now? Maybe Labour would like to recycle their own words?
Report abuse
A simply brilliant political tactic and sensible idea. Lets stick to the facts and invite sensible alnternatives instead of the objection for objections sake nonsense from telfords labour group; the party that left all its highstreets empty when it introduced excessive parking charges across the borough . Come on Austin you brief us on your ideas first ! Let have some honest proposals instead of pathetic politics .
Silly me its like trying to pour tea out of my chocolate tea pot suggesting a labour councillor make sensible proposals to cut public spending………………………
Report abuse