Bid to stop Bishop’s Castle biomass plant fails

Thursday 9th December 2010, 12:50PM GMT.

Campaigners failed in a last-ditch bid today to stop a controversial £5 million biomass plant being built in south Shropshire.

A petition handed in with more than 1,400 names on it triggered another debate on plans for land at Bishop’s Castle Business Park at a full Shropshire Council meeting today.

But the majority voted to uphold the decision of the council’s cabinet in October to sell the land to Bishop’s Castle Biomass Power – which could spell the end of a four-year campaign.

Councillor Mike Owen, Shropshire Council portfolio holder for waste and economy, moved to reject the petition and said the proposal had been “thoroughly aired” at an eight-day public inquiry.

He said the scheme offered the best financial and economic outcome for the land and added 37 planning conditions attached to the plant would ensure it was rigorously monitored and enforced.

He said the tendering process had been fair, open and accessible, and there was no justification for retendering.

Forty members of the dominant Tory group voted to reject the petition. There were 17 votes against from the Labour, Lib Dem and independent groups on the authority. Campaign leader Michael Dawes, on behalf of the Bishop’s Castle Group, was allowed to make a five minute address to the council.

He claimed that guidelines for the sale of the site were at odds with the four-storey high power station. Mr Dawes asked: “Is the council a hard-faced oligarchy that imposes an unwanted and ill-thought out development on a small community against its will or is it a responsive body that listens to the people and responds accordingly?”

After the debate, Mr Dawes said the group would be writing to the council chief executive to see if the issue could be further examined under the informal tendering process.

He said: “Today’s decision was taken on purely party political lines.”

By Dave Morris


  1. 1
    robert

    people should look at this as a gift to the area , employment , green power , if they can’t see the objective , they must pay the price (IE more taxes ) please look at the long term !!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Michael Dawes

    Robert forgive me but how can this be a gift, perhaps 4 jobs from 5,000 sq M of scarce business land which according to a public statement of the developer will not go to local folks, it is a tiny amount of power and is produced inefficiently from a scarce resource which recently saw a europe wide day of action organsised by the Wood Panel Industry Federationw who can see their sustainable feedstock being burnt, threateneing thousands of jobs, 650 being at Chirk. But Taxes where does that come from? have you not realised that the burning of this fuel at these levels of efficiency is only concieveable due to massive subsidy. That funding stream is derived from the rigged elctricity market which makes you pay a premium for the power you use in order to subsidise these useless biomass schemes. And as the market is rigged by the government that is about the same as a tax as far as I can see and amounts to state aid which is a market distortion. By the way you are not by any chance Robert Povall are you a beneficiary of this largess handed out at our expense. Speak up.

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.