Bishop’s Castle biomass plans to be reconsidered
Wednesday 29th September 2010, 11:41AM BST.
A CONTROVERSIAL decision to set aside land for a multi-million pound biomass plant in a south Shropshire town will have to be reconsidered – to the joy of hundreds of residents.
Members of Shropshire Council’s development service scrutiny committee received a standing ovation from residents last night as they unanimously agreed to ask cabinet members to rethink their decision.
On August 4, the council’s cabinet committee agreed to provisionally accept an offer from Bishop’s Castle Biomass Power for the site at the town’s business park.
They also called for the tendering process to be reopened to allow a number of other proposals for the site – including plans by Bishop’s Castle Wasteless Society to create a community care farm – to be put forward.
More than 300 people packed into the hall at Bishop’s Castle Community College for last night’s meeting to voice their objections to the wood chip burning plant planned for land on the town’s business park.
The meeting was delayed to allow 50 people stuck outside to enter the hall – and the crowd greeted the committee’s decision with lengthy applause and cheering.
Councillor Alan Mosley, chairman of the scrutiny committee, said the decision had been unanimous and listed six reasons behind their recommendation. These included the “massive weight” of public opposition, fears of potential health hazards and the short length of the initial tendering process earlier in the year.
Councillors also felt too little attention had been given to alternative uses for the site and felt that the decision contradicted the authority’s sustainable community strategy and tendering guidelines. The initial decision had been called in by the Liberal Democrat group on Shropshire Council, and local campaigners said the latest development was a victory for common sense.
Councillor Nigel Hartin, leader of the Liberal Democrat group, said: “I’m really pleased – this sends a clear message to cabinet that they ignore public opinion and go against their own strategy at serious risk.”
Michael Dawes, a Bishop’s Castle resident with a background in planning, said: “It’s the first time in three years we have had a fair and reasonable hearing from local government which is incredibly refreshing – it’s common sense at last.”
Karen Bavastock, chairman of the Bishop’s Castle Group, said: “We’re very pleased.”
Peter Phillips, Shropshire councillor for Bishop’s Castle, said: “Members of the committee have responded to the overwhelming strength of local opinion.”
Councillor Mosley said: “The turnout was astonishing for a relatively small town.
“This matter will now be discussed again by the town council on the back of the strong and unanimous decision of the scrutiny committee.”
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

I would wish to thank all the members of the scrutiny committee and the members who called in this dreadful scheme for reappraisal.
This is the first time that the matters of principle have been discusssed openly by elected members in over 3 years.
That so many people turned out to show their opposition is living proof of the antipathy of local people both to the proposal and the manner in which some have tried to impose this apalling scheme.
But where were the developers? Why do they never turn up to defend their proposals. Why do they refuse always to answer questions about their intent?
Surely we are not so frightening that they fear molestation. The reality is that they cannot defend the scheme or their approach. They have no answers because their scheme is not designed, only illustrative drawings have been supplied. They failed to take out an option on the land thereby misleading the public inquiry even when challenged.. they do not know where the fuel is coming from They claimed to offer the benefit of a heat main but did nothing to work up a technical and financial scheme to see if it was feasible.
Mr Days schemes have been opposed in Warwickshire at Tenbury Wells and in South Northamptonshire. The plant at Eccelshall where he has said he is consulltant engineer has suffered from serious problems and according to our information puts out far less power and operates for less time than originally claimed. Its permit was withdrawn in Dec 2008 owning to huge exceedences of particulate emmissions.
For sure it is difficult to defend such a scheme. and the very clever people who run Drax say there is no money to be made without further subsidy.
Give up now Mr Evans and save yourself and everybody else the grief you cannot defend in public.
Report abuse