Rallying call to save Royal British Legion clubs
- Today's leader
Telford’s new civic offices plan ‘obscene’, says councillor
Thursday 16th September 2010, 7:00PM BST.
Plans to build “lavish” new civic offices in Telford for council staff have been branded “obscene” by a leading councillor.
Labour opposition leader Councillor Keith Austin said he believed there was no way that chiefs could justify such an outlay while 400 jobs were on the line due to budget cuts. The Labour leader has always claimed the controversial plans will be financed by “massive borrowing”.
He said the new offices should have been less expensive to build and located out of the town centre.
He also claimed an agreement to set up a committee to monitor decisions made on the new civic offices had never been honoured, with decisions being taken without scrutiny from outside.
Council leader Andrew Eade said there would be no cost to the taxpayer by building the new offices in the middle of the £250 million Southwater development, with all cash coming from the sale of the current site to Asda.
Devastating
But Councillor Austin said: “This council is currently in the process of making devastating service cuts of 20 per cent right across the council, including 400 job losses, which will inevitably have a damaging effect on front-line services.
“The Tories’ plan to go ahead with new lavish offices based in a prime town centre location is quite frankly obscene, especially during this time of economic downturn and, when all the costs are included, will again require massive borrowing to add to the council’s current spiralling debt mountain.
“They have just not thought this through.”
Councillor Eade said the council would be able to cover any costs associated with the construction of the new civic offices with cash gained from the sale of existing headquarters and land around it to Asda.
He added: “I want to be absolutely clear – there will be no net cost to the taxpayer and at the end we will have a much more efficient and lower-cost building from which to serve the people of the borough.”
In February last year Labour demanded council chiefs look again at the plans after expressing “grave concerns” about the funding and location of the new civic offices.
By Wayne Beese
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.


This does seem like a huge waste of money – and why does it need to be in the town centre where property prices are much higher.
It doesn’t matter where the money is coming from – it would be better spent elsewhere.
I live in Shropshire, not Telford, so I hope it’s coming out of the Telford purse rather than Shropshire.
Report abuse
I wonder if Cllr Austin would be so critical if it had been his group bringing forward the plans? Soure grapes anyone?
The current building was (I am told) built originally to be a multi-storey car park. It is far too hot in summer, and the heating can be erratic in the winter, so much so that staff often work in short sleeves. A new energy efficient building would make some kind of sense, and if the sale of the current site includes the provision of new offices being built for the council (planning gain) then that also seems sensible.
Especially if the staff at Darby House can be decanted so everyone works together – another saving in the costs.
Yes I suppose the overall costs could be lower by locating the offices in Hadley, or Donnington, or maybe even Newport where land values might be lower, but overlooks the fact that people often want to get to the offices to talk to someone, and the bus station is opposite – as is the Police Station, and a shopping centre where I assume a lot of people congregate.
If the Offices were moved anywhere else there would be some harsh words from folk, if they found that they could not get there – as well as complaints from every other geographical area that they were not moved to their location!
Report abuse
Opposition for the sake of it.
Wasn’t the Southwater development originally brought forward by the previous Labour administration led by Councillor Austin?
Additionally, they will be located on land that the council already owns whereas anywhere else and they would likely have to buy the land.
Besides, planning policy states that major office developments should be located in town centres unless there are no sites which is not an argument that could be used in central Telford.
Report abuse
apart from the fact that a good chunk of the usable town park is going to be lost for this egotistical venture.
Report abuse
It isn’t being built on the park.
Report abuse
I believe these developments could be of good use…. Although the money could very well be used for other means such as charity and hospital.
I trust that this new Build will be taking into account Higher security and better health and safety aspects as so the numbre of people visiting the A&E department on a saturday night is reduced.
If all this build is going to do is bring more Anti social behaviour to the telford area then they myt aswell spend the money on building an open plan prison!
I have on good grounds, knowlege that the Town park will not be affected (That town park helps make telford what it is) Though what this “Regeneration” will turn out to be like will be very interesting.
Report abuse
A concrete monstrosity of 1960′s design.
Is that the best the architect could do?
It’s hideous.
Report abuse