Shropshire MP backs cutting cost of politics

Wednesday 15th September 2010, 9:46AM BST.

A Shropshire MP today said the cost of politics should be reduced – as long as the county’s residents do not lose “proper and adequate” representation in Parliament.

Wrekin Tory MP Mark Pritchard made the comments after it was yesterday revealed that the county could lose an MP under plans to redraw constituencies and cut the number of Commons seats.

The county’s political map faces a shake-up under the Tory-Lib Dem coalition Government’s plans to equalise the size of constituencies before the next General Election in 2015.

The Boundary Commission is to be tasked with redrawing constituency boundaries as part of a bid to cut the number of Commons MPs from 650 to 600.

However, the Electoral Reform Society has released its own map of possible new parliamentary constituencies – down-sizing Shropshire’s parliamentary representation from five to four MPs – which would trigger a scramble for seats.

Mr Pritchard said: “I believe the cost of politics should be reduced which means making the House of Commons smaller as long as the people of Shropshire do not lose proper and adequate parliamentary representation.”

North Shropshire’s MP Owen Paterson said: “This is all speculation.”

The Tory MP and Northern Ireland Secretary added: “But I am in favour of equalising constituencies and getting rid of the current extreme differences which give very unbalanced results in favour of Labour.”

Under the Electoral Reform Society’s blueprint, Oswestry & Market Drayton would be made up of all the present North Shropshire electoral wards, plus parts of The Wrekin.

Shrewsbury and Bayston Hill would comprise parts of the existing Shrewsbury & Atcham and Ludlow constituencies.

Parts of The Wrekin, Ludlow and Telford would be served by an MP for Madeley & Bridgnorth.

And a new seat called Telford Dawley & Oakengates/Donnington would also be created.

Under the coalition’s Parliamentary Voting system and Constituencies Bill, the boundaries of parliamentary seats would be changed to have roughly the same number of voters with a five per cent variation around an average constituency size of a 75,000 electorate – which Labour argues will cost the party seats.

It is a claim that has been rejected by the Bill’s architect, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, who says the Boundary Commission, not the Government, will redraw the map.

By London reporter Sunita Patel


  1. 1
    Kath

    I really don’t care any more. How many MPs, what flavour – I don’t see it makes any difference.
    One lot are star-struck by rich bankers and their like and allow them to bankrupt the country by using our money like free chips at a virtual casino.

    Then in comes a bunch of over-fed, over-privileged, smug-faced Tory/LibDem millionaires practically drooling with excitement as, with one wave of a plump, manicured little hand they consign thousands to the dole or cut the meagre benefits of the disabled and pensioners.

    If I have to see or hear them one more time pontificating about ‘lifestyle choices’ of benefit claimants, while cutting back on the HMRC staff who have at least a chance of retrieving the vastly greater sums the country loses in unpaid taxes – I will probably throw up.

    Bah humbug!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Antony Corbett

    its about time we got rid of a few these usless people on the gravy train.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Kath

    My comment a bit too eloquent, was it? ;)

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    DevilsChair

    Fine on reducing the amount of MPs, but please bring evidence for public debate on how public representation is going to be continued with MPs indiviually representing ever more people.

    We need to use technology for those who have it to contact their MP (record enquiries and responses and public none-personal ones) so that others dont have to ask the same question AND the MP can be accountable. Also produce a league table of MPs and how efficiently they respond to members of publics enquiries (but only record them as a positive result if they actually sort out the problem. (reminds you of how they treat schools.. it should). Good idea though.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Andrew finch

    They the public will be moaning next we have not got a fair representation . Lets face in some parts of the country the people need not bother to vote as it is either tory/labour controlled always will be and even more so if you cut our MP’S to much.

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.