Shropshire’s forced adoption figures are revealed

Tuesday 10th August 2010, 8:00PM BST.

Shropshire’s forced adoption figures are revealed

Nearly 100 children have been forcibly taken away from their parents in Shropshire in the last four years, new figures today revealed.

The release of the information comes following a Freedom of Information request published on www.whatdotheyknow.com The figures, revealed by Shropshire Council, show that between April 1, 2006, and March 31 this year, 95 children were forcibly removed.

Forcible adoption or “placement orders” are orders authorising a local authority to place a child for adoption where there is no parental consent, or where consent is not required.

The consent of a parent or guardian may not be necessary in certain circumstances, such as if the parent or guardian cannot be found or they are incapable of giving their agreement, for example through mental illness. Consent may also not be required if a court is satisfied that the welfare of the child is in danger.

Only local authorities can apply for a placement order, which they must do if a child is the subject of a care order and there is no parental consent, or where they consider the child is at risk of harm.

Adoption

Heather Jones, assistant information governance officer for Shropshire Council, said: “The adoption service for Shropshire is a joint service for Telford & Wrekin Council and Shropshire Council.

“The number of children forcibly adopted by this service from April 1, 2006, to March 31, this year is 95.”

Shropshire Council officers said they could not provide a breakdown of figures per year.

Catherine Warner, head of Joint Adoption Service at Shropshire Council, said: “Forceable adoption takes place when a court has determined that a child can no longer live with their birth family for a variety of reasons.”

The news comes as fears were voiced by a Shirehall union leader that Shropshire is “very, very lucky” it has not had its own Baby P case because of growing workload pressure on council staff and funding cuts.

Last week Lou Gladden, assistant branch secretary of Shropshire Unison, claimed services were already at “breaking point”. Baby P – Peter Connelly – died in London in 2007 after suffering horrific abuse.

By Emma Kasprzak


  1. 1
    Liz

    This isn’t “forced” adoption it’s normal adoption. The people who neglect and abuse their children don’t just say “ok, it’s a fair cop guv” and hand the children over you know. Catherine Warner is being totally irresponsible referring to it as “Forcible adoption”. Would it have been forcible adoption if Baby P had been saved? Is forcible adoption where his sisters are? These people mean that Baby P’s sisters were forcibly adopted, because sure as hell the birthmother hasn’t consented. I knew someone who fostered a child who had 9 major broken bones before he was 50 days old. I wonder if he was forcibly adopted or should have gone back to his teenage birthparents when they came out of jail. Adoption mostly isn’t about cute babies any more, it’s about finding parents strong enough to bring up children who have been that badly damaged. Do you fancy having to tell that baby why he had to be adopted? Somewhere a real adoptive parent is going to have to one day.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    KR

    I agree with Liz, the use of “forcible adoption” is lazy and only used by those who claim social services are also “baby snatchers”. Perhaps they should have “snatched” Baby P earlier and all those other children who die at the hands of the ones who should be caring for them, but then there would be more “forcible adoptions”. I can’t believe the head of an adoption service would use the term forcible adoption. It is adoption without parent’s consent. The ones who cannot keep children safe. The children covered in bruises, burns, broken bones, who have received a punch insted of a hug, who don’t get fed regularly, who lie in dirty homes and in dirty clothes because ma and pa are high on crack or on a three day drinking binge. Who scrabble through bins looking for food, who hit their siblings because that is what they have been taught. Who have been sexually abused in return for money for drugs…

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Virginia

    I would have been happy to forcibly adopt Baby P. Know the trauma would have been a lot for him, having to leave a filthy home with an evil sadistic step father and uncle and and a animal for a mother.
    He would have to be with me, a woman who cannot have children, and who would have cleaned, fed, cared for, nurtured and just plain and simply loved him with all her heart, and enjoyed watching him grow up.
    Like I said, would have been hard, but somehow, I think that he would have gotten over it, eventually.

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.