Quarter of Shropshire’s new homes built on back gardens

Thursday 5th August 2010, 11:00PM BST.

Quarter of Shropshire’s new homes built on back gardens

More than a quarter of all new homes in Shropshire have been built on back gardens in the last three years, official figures reveal today.

Just one in eight homes – 12 per cent – were crammed into residential plots in 1997, rising to 28 per cent by 2009 – an increase of 16 per cent. The data lays bare the increase in the number of properties being bought by developers in the county, excluding Telford & Wrekin, to reap a profit.

This is similar to the national picture which has seen the practice of “garden-grabbing” increase by 14 per cent in England, rising from 11 per cent to 25 per cent in the same period.

In the Telford & Wrekin area, one in five homes is now being built on previous residential land – up from two per cent to 20 per cent.

In June, the new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition announced measures to stop the practice which has seen green suburbs turn grey.

Councils had struggled to stop the trend with gardens classified as “previously residential land” making them brownfield sites.

That designation is responsible for putting them in the same category as derelict factories and disused railway sidings.

But the planning rules were changed to stop gardens being seen as brownfield land, giving local authorities and campaigners greater powers to block building.

Communities Minister Greg Clark, who released the data, said the figures proved it was right for the Government to introduce new legislation to make it a more difficult practice.

“For years local people were powerless to do anything about the blight of garden grabbing as the character of their neighbourhoods was destroyed and their wishes ignored,” he said.

“We can see from these statistics that last year an even higher proportion of homes were built on previously residential land, which includes back gardens.

“Building on gardens robs communities of green breathing space, safe places for children to play and havens for urban wildlife.

“It was ridiculous that gardens were classified in the same group as derelict factories and disused railway sidings.

“Now we’ve changed the classification of garden land, councils and communities will no longer have their decisions constantly overruled, and will have the power to work with industry to shape future development that is appropriate for their area,” he added.

By London Reporter Sunita Patel


  1. 1
    Matt

    I’m glad the Government are trying to end this practice as I have had this happen to me, with my ‘neighbour’. I bought a house which had a lovely quiet back garden and backed onto another quiet back garden.
    The land was, a few years later, sold off to developers who built houses on it. My quiet back garden now has cars inches away, shining lights into the garden, music, etc. As a result the house is worth around £10’000 less than what it used to be. I know I don’t have a right to say what other people do with their own land but it has a massive knock on effect. I’ll never be truly happy – and know I can move, but have to learn to live with it.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Shrewsbury Born n Bred

    There are so many other planning policies to stop overdevelopment of ‘garden land’, this reclassification wasn’t really required.

    My understanding is that this reclassification was just to stop single dwellings/flats being squeezed into tiny plots. Most Planning Authorities will still support development of garden land (in decent sized plots) as long as it doesn’t create any other planning issues because realistically, if we don’t infill these larger plots, we MUST expand outwards into the countryside to meet housing need.

    Unfortunately, a lot of people aren’t seeing this bigger picture and are now objecting to every ‘garden’ application with the incorrect argument that Council’s can no longer approve ‘garden grabbing’ and are also against expansion of towns.

    If theyre not supportive of new housing how on earth will I ever afford to buy myself a home?! – I don’t want to be pushed out because of affordability and lack of housing supply.

    Report abuse

    • Rob, Telford

      We don’t have to “expand outwards into the countryside to meet housing need” – we could just try limiting population growth.

      We already live in one of the world’s most densely-populated countries, but our politicians witter on about “sustainable” housing development to house an ever-larger population.

      Report abuse

  3. 3
    Matthew

    It is high time garden grabbing was stopped. Houses were built with gardens for a reason. They were designed that way because it is healthy for families to have a outdoor place to play and to relax in. Humans are not machines to be packed in smaller and smaller boxes like sardines. It is no wonder why you often see children and young people on the streets. Where are they meant to go when there are no gardens and every green space says “no ball games”? Also these developments are normally at the expense of those living nearby. They often rely on street parking at the expense of everyone else and put pressure on local infrastructure not to mention overlooking other people’s homes. We should also bear in mind wildlife which is also the victim of these developments. Gardens are like a green oasis for wildlife in the towns. This is another example of how greed is ruining this country.

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.