Telford council’s £700,000 trips and slips bill
Wednesday 30th June 2010, 3:25PM BST.
TELFORD & WREKIN Council has forked out nearly £700,000 in compensation to people who have tripped over on borough footpaths in the last five years, it was revealed today.
The data, released under the Freedom of Information Act, put the council 34th out of the 90 highest-paying local authorities that were examined.
It was revealed that the council paid out £685,450 in compensation and spent more than £3million maintaining borough footpaths over the same period.
The figures have sparked fears the council could be caught in a “vicious circle” if planned Government cutbacks, which may see spending cuts on footpaths.
Whitehall has written to councils asking for their help in identifying savings that would limit job losses.
Rise
Mark Brickles, CEO of itsmyclaim.com, a consumer claims service that conducted the Freedom of Information request, said he feared the figure would rise.
He said: “Ambulance chasers are literally tripping over themselves to win the lucrative custom of personal injury victims, with some paying middlemen up to £1,000 as a referral fee.
“With huge spending cuts on the horizon, which themselves will no doubt impact highway repairs and improvements, this figure is only set to rise. Effectively, taxpayers will find themselves in a position where their taxes will be spent on rising volumes of claims.”
He added: “The councils are going to get caught in a vicious circle because the footpaths and roads aren’t going to be repaired quick enough and as a result the number of claims will rise.”
The TaxPayers’ Alliance said taxpayers cash was being squandered.
Council leader Andrew Eade said investment in roads and footpaths was a priority. “We have already committed record investment to improving this infrastructure of around £14 million,” he said. “However, we are also aware that the country’s financial future is very uncertain and consequently there will be pressures on such budgets. Consequently the picture won’t become much clearer until the Comprehensive Spending Review later this year.”
The figures do not include court costs.
By Alex James
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

Anyone try telling these claiments to look where they are going?
Thousands upon thousands must have NOT tripped or fell over these ”obstructions”.
The public need to be responsible for their own actions instead of depending on the ”nanny” state to bail them out for their inability to see a fall or trip hazard.
It only happens in the UK and USA where lawyers have set up another new way of making money.
Report abuse
Er have you any idea how difficult it is to see a trip hazard? Especially if you are older and equally more liable to do serious damage with even a small trip. Broken wrist (s)and hip being the most common injuries.
These issues are not as straight forward as you might think.
Report abuse
I fell off my bar stool a while back after consuming a few too many Addlestone’s ciders – the shock and trauma will be with me for years; can I have £600,000+ please?
Seriously, this really is a sad indictment of the greed of our compensation culture obsessed society, and that of the ambulance chasing lawyers whose infuriating advertisements are seen too frequently on TV. Insane health and safety legislation drives me as mad as the next normal person, but I’m afraid that it is a direct consequence of such actions.
It does make me quietly seethe when I read a news report concerning the alleged victim of a trip, slip, fall or whatever ending with a mournful looking picture of the afflicted, and the words: “He/she is now considering legal action”. It’s at that stage that I will usually lose any sympathy I may have had with the “victim”.
Report abuse