Telford & Wrekin councillors’ expenses published
Thursday 24th June 2010, 12:53PM BST.
Councillors sitting on Telford & Wrekin Council received just under £650,000 in allowances and expenses in the last 12 months, new figures reveal.
The authority has published the figures on its website showing how much each of its 54 councillors received. They are the flat rate payments made to all councillors for the roles they perform as elected members.
All councillors receive a basic allowance and some councillors receive further allowance payments for special responsibilities, such as performing a cabinet or scrutiny role or that of another post, such as the Mayor.
In addition to allowances, councillors claimed a total of £12,008 in expenses between them.
The figures also show that 21 co-optees who support the work of the council but are not elected members received a total of just under £14,000 in allowances.
The most money went to council leader Councillor Andrew Eade who received £31,674 for his role. He claimed no out-of-pocket expenses, however.
Allowances
Next in line was deputy leader Councillor Jacqueline Seymour who was paid £23,794 in allowances and claimed an additional £!,528 in expenses on top.
Other notable payments went to Councillor Stephen Bentley (£19,697 allowances, £1,212 expenses), Councillor Eric Carter (£19,696 allowances, ££1,845 expenses) and Councillor Adrian Lawrence (£19,697 allowances, £895 expenses), all three being members of the council’s ruling cabinet.
Fellow cabinet members Stephen Burrell and Miles Hosken were also paid £19,697 in allowances but neither claimed any expenses.
Councillor Eade said: “It’s very important that the public understands what allowances councillors receive and that we are very open and transparent about this.
“All councillors have a responsibility to work hard in their wards and a significant number have responsibilities over and above this and for many it can be pretty much a full time job.
“However, in these difficult times the council has commissioned an independent review of allowances paid to councillors and co-optees to ensure that the residents of Telford & Wrekin are receiving value for money from the people who represent them.”
By Simon Hardy
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.


I thought TAWPA said they would not claim any more money that they needed to perform their duties…I thought TAWPA was different
Report abuse
These are selfless, public spirited servants of their communities who *volunteered* to become councillors for the good of those same communities!
Perish the thought that most of them are just in it for the money eh?
Report abuse
As I’m not really up to speed on councillors, (and there are certainly a lot more of them plus their co-opted colleagues (?) than I realised), would someone please assure me that “David G Wright” on £15757 plus 15.3% pension contribution is not the same as “David Wright MP” on parliamentary salary, expenses and gold-plated pension. Thank you. (Genuine question, I really do not know.)
Report abuse
I thought that councillors were supposed to be people who have a public service ethos, and were willing to give freely of their spare time to serve their community.
Looking at some of the allowances here I find myself seriously doubting that.
Well done to those who have done nothing more than claim legitimate out of pocket expenses, but you would really have to question the motives of people who are taking 15, 19 even 20 thousand pounds each, (plus for some reason pension!).
In one case a married couple are taking £32k from the system – I’m sure there are many hard-pressed hard-working families in T and W who would be very glad of that for an annual income.
Most of these councillors will also have full-time jobs, often with pension provision, and at the same time low-paid council workers will soon find their pay, pensions and jobs under threat. Are these councillors really in this for altruistic public service reasons, or are they in it for a second, largely unearned, income?
Report abuse