Shropshire in £2 million funding cut
Thursday 10th June 2010, 2:00PM BST.
Shropshire Council is to lose more than £2.1 million of its targeted Whitehall funding, it was announced today.
A big slice of this will come from its education budget, which is set to be slashed by £1.71 million.
Its cashpot for improving road safety is to be reduced by £187,000.
A total of £173,000 is to be cut from administration costs and a further £35,000 which would have been used to boost community relations in the area.
Telford & Wrekin Council has been told it will be getting its targeted funding cut by more than £1.7 million this year. Some £1.5 million of the cuts will be in its education department, £91,000 saved in administration costs and its road safety funding reduced by £79,000.
Further cuts will come from cash used to tackle violent extremism some £48,000 and £33,000 from funds used to boost community cohesion.
The savings are to be made from the councils’ current 2010/2011 budget, and represents 0.8 per cent of Shropshire’s overall funding from Government, and 0.9 per cent of Telford and Wrekin Council’s Whitehall allocations.
Announcing where the axe will fall in each English council, Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles said core Government funding for councils will remain untouched, including cash for schools, to protect frontline services and prevent council tax rises.
And he confirmed that no local authority will face reductions in their revenue grant comprising so-called area grants used to tackle anti-social behaviour, unemployment and youth crime in the poorest areas of more than two per cent.
Local government has been told to save £1.165 billion of the £6.2bn cuts planned for this year to help reduce the £156bn deficit.
Mr Pickles said: “The detailed spending decisions outlined today show a clear determination to make the necessary savings whilst minimising the impact on essential frontline services like rubbish collections and protecting spending on schools and Sure Start.”
He added that steps had been taken to limit the impact on local authorities.
Shadow Communities Secretary John Denham said the cuts were “unfair”.
By London Reporter Sunita Patel
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

Well, that’s a relief.
These initials cuts won’t really hurt the general public.
Schools have had more than enough money thrown at them in the past and should easily be able to make savings. £1.71 million between each school in Shropshire is probably not going to make a huge difference anyway and recession and cuts are when school managers’ skills come to the play, sorting out the doers from the wafflers. And a I hope that there will be a lot less resort to “early retirement” when the wafflers can’t handle it, because it’s taxpayers who pay for, and support, these generous and often-indulgent retirement schemes.
Road safety: inherently a traffic police job with some taught in schools anyway, so not much at danger there, especially as there’s still a budget existing. If this subject worries people, then the money could be shifted from various odd projects that the council seem to have initiated in the recent past. Additionally, any “passive” road safety such as markings and signs can be taken from the road budget. Any chief highways engineer who is worth their salary should have learnt the concept of designing safety into road construction at school. No reason for a separate department and budget – time to make people at the top less reliant on consultants to do their job for them and use assets at their disposal more effectively
Administration: I’m surprised that it’s so little; I would have thought that there’s scope for further, much larger savings somewhere amongst the monster bureaucracy that’s thrived under Labour largesse.
Community relations: people will either be friendly to each other or they won’t. No need for payment to council employees to try and make us all be nice to each other and in cases where we’re not, and it affects the community, then “resolution” of the matter can come from the police budget, (i.e. a police response). Again, this is a reduction, not a disappearance of funding anyway and is to be applauded also for its potential in making people rely less on the state telling them how to act and behave.
Scope for far more, methinks. Culture doesn’t seem to have played its role in saving money yet. There’s also a lot of strange jobs out there that I really don’t think are necessary to provide a decent level of public service or essential services.
Report abuse
well no doubt they will fill the hole with rises in council tax as happened for the last 13 years under labour, they cut money to local government and then use council tax as a “stealth tax” to plug the gap, typical.
Report abuse
good they are bloated and need to go on a diet lets hope this means less red tape for licencing and inspections
Report abuse
i hope our tory mp will oppose this, he has highlighted we in shropshire get less money per pupil than all the chavy labour slums like telford and brum do, so they should get more cuts not us, we have nice schools here and we need to put more money into them not cut them, surely our tory mp can use his influence with his chums in downing st to get the cuts made elsewhere instead
Report abuse
its true shropshire school children have less money per pupil from the government than almost anywhere in england
Report abuse