Wrekin campaigners digging in for a fight

Saturday 29th May 2010, 11:29AM BST.

The protesters have spent weeks digging a network of tunnels under the Huntington Lane site
The protesters have spent weeks digging a network of tunnels under the Huntington Lane site

Green campaigners have moved into secret tunnels under The Wrekin, claiming they are putting their lives on the line to defend the beauty spot from developers, it was revealed today.

The protesters have spent weeks digging a network of tunnels under the Huntington Lane site near Little Wenlock.

They say it will stop UK Coal from bringing diggers onto the site and starting work to mine 900,000 tonnes of coal for fear of the tunnels collapsing and injuring someone.

But Chris Crouch, spokesman for UK Coal, called the protesters’ actions “irresponsible” and said an eviction notice would now have to be served on them.

One campaigner, who did not want to be named, said: “Digging a tunnel is a very dangerous thing to do, it’s very risky.

“You have to be very determined and strong-willed to live in one, you are putting your life on the line doing it.

Mining

“The tunnels are a very effective way to defend a piece of land. There’s an awful lot of procedure to go through if they want to remove people from a tunnel so it’s the best way forward.”

Another campaigner, who also did not want to be named, said the plan was to further step up the fight against the mining company.

“The aim is to cause as many problems as possible for UK Coal to protect that site,” he said. “They (UK Coal) should not be under any illusions. The people who are prepared to take a stand have many plans, these are just some of them.

“This is now much, much bigger. We have established there’s significant mines that are capable of sustaining people to live in.

“We have maps with mines that they don’t even know about so the potential is there to go much further.”

The protester added it would cost UK Coal thousands of pounds to dig them out and unless the holes were manned, they would crawl back in under the darkness of night.

Mr Crouch said: “It’s going to be a while before the heavy work starts. We can’t work the site with people buried. It’s very, very irresponsible.”


  1. 1
    wayne

    i take it all these people are live on the dole?i wish i could find time to dig tunnels under the wrekin,o i cant because i have to work and pay taxes to fund these idle fools get a proper job

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    MF

    Oi Swampy, I’ve a garden that needs double digging, are you free?
    Failing that….
    Ooh, I have a beautiful copper beech on my land and a Herr Ulbrecht Karl Kohl wishes to check for fossil fuels, now how can a person with no lawful rights of access be convinced into digging for victory?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    disgusted

    So they plan to stop the mining by doing their own mining! get a life and stop sponging off the hard working minority

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    ian

    personaly i say if they are stupid enough to do such a thing as thin they deserve to get buried we need energy do these idiots think it comes from thin air just bury them and collaps the tunnels and start mining

    Report abuse

    • Jason

      I agree. Just start mining. They’ll soon start popping out of one hole or another!!! Bloody moles!!!!!!!!!

      Report abuse

    • Grant

      Surely, that is not so good an idea. Correct cole is an energy source, but inefficient not a sustainable source by any means in comparison to nuclear or turbine energy. Plus I assume that mining for the cole would considerably damage the aesthetics of the Wrekin.

      So in essence, as long as you can have “energy”, you’re reasonably happy for Telford and other areas to become a mining site with no natural beauty at all?! … right…. well, good luck with that..

      Report abuse

  5. 5
    magistersampson@aol.com

    Mr Crouch should be aware, that upon the issuing of any eviction notices, given due course of law, and the time period of grace allowed under this, that the eviction action will become a Nationwide call for every Eco warrior, protester, Green, to rally at the Huntington site, to defend its status.
    The power station protests that have ben seen in the last 2 years, could become a similar scenario.
    Magister.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    normanis29

    So why is old swampy there worried about being identified?
    Can it be that they are in touch with the news and is concerned that without his disguise he will have his Incapacity Benefit stopped?

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Graham

    The level of igorance and general selfish, delusional comments on this message board astounds me. It would appear that the good public of Telford hate it when people don’t conform to the crowd. When they put in some very hard and risky work to defend a beautiful site. The evidence for Anthropomorphic climate change is out there and it would be foolish to ignore.
    The individuals at this site are brave, passionate, thoughtful and have foresight and ideas for positive social change.
    Shame on all the ones who snipe from the sidelines. For you are blind sheep.
    many of the people dedicate to defending this site balance jobs, family and life while giving time to this important issue.
    The usual rubbish about not having a job TEC is a cop-out and a cheap one at that.

    Report abuse

    • spencer

      Graham, its not digging for coal that you have a problem with its digging for coal in YOUR backyard.
      And please don’t insult our intelligence with all that eco-warrior claptrap because if you really cared about the environment then you’d be worrying about transporting coal from halfway round the world by road,rail and boat to heat the houses of Little Wenlock.
      And as for these ” brave individuals “, i almost hope you win your little battle so you can welcome these people in to your community to live among you long after they’re no longer needed..

      Report abuse

      • Graham

        Thanks Spencer for letting me know what my opinions are. Yeah your right, I really don’t care as long as these things don’t happen in my backyard. I don’t give a toss about climate change just so long as it happens in other parts of the world!
        Digging up coal and burning it in vast quantities is bad where ever it comes from. The amount UK coal plans to take from the Telford site will make little impact to imports from anywhere else in the world.
        Fir me the most practical thing I can do is oppose this on a local level and try make connections with other people working on the same issues globally.

        One of the good things about the site is the majority of the people there are local.People like them will always be needed because there are sadly far too many people who just don’t care. I would rather live with them and have them as my neighbours than some of the ignorant people on this forum who make sloppy generalizations about others when they clearly poorly informed.

        Report abuse

        • spencer

          ” one of the good things about the site is the majority of the people there are local “..

          Then why was it reported in the Shropshire Star a couple of weeks ago about a car shuttle service being set up to ferry people to the site from the train station. Last time i checked Little Wenlock didn’t have one of those..

          Report abuse

        • Graham

          Spencer I think the week you mention was a bank holiday weekend. We were expecting supporters from outside the area to visit so thought it would be a good idea to meet people at the station. The camp can be hard to find if you are not sure of the area and arriving after dark. The core structure of the camp is made up of locals with other people from around the UK staying on site helping share skills and their knowledge. Have you actually bothered to visit the camp ? When was the last time you went out and talked to the people at the site to find out these thing for yourself ? It’s been there for around four months now! Your comments just come across as pedantic nit-picking and not very constructive.

          Report abuse

        • spencer

          Then you are really fortunate to have so many seasoned protesters with tunnelling expertise living in your local area.
          I just hope that if an excavation driver were to accidentaly injure or kill one of these tunnel rats it will also live on your conscience, because the driver was just doing his job, creating jobs for others..

          Is that a sloppy enough generalisation for you..

          Report abuse

        • Graham

          “I just hope that if an excavation driver were to accidentally injure or kill one of these tunnel rats it will also live on your conscience, because the driver was just doing his job, creating jobs for others..”

          Spencer I would be devastated if injury of death were to happen to anyone at the site. Would it live on my conscience ? The people taking these actions do so of their own free will. They Know the risks. No one has made to do this, except UK coal. They are not following orders, Just doing their job. That excuse has been used to many times throughout history.
          Do you know how many jobs this site will actually create? Have you not read any of the previous posts on this thread? There are thousands of jobs that could be created in the sustainable energy sector.
          If we continue to burn coal at our present rate there will be much more at stake than a few dirty coal jobs.Risks that are too important to ignore.
          The overriding reason people are doing this is because they have do a conscience.
          I hope that when the orders are given and the excavation/eviction teams are sent in they will have a concience also. Spencer would you injure of kill a person on the grounds of following orders, Just doing a job ?
          Your thinking on these matters is narrow and continues to be very sloppy, sadly.
          I see no reason to continue to debate these issues with you.You have nothing constructive to say.

          Report abuse

  8. 8
    Huw Peach

    Like Wayne (#1) I work and pay taxes.

    Unlike him, I don’t see the protesters as ‘idle fools’.

    Nor do I think they are ‘sponging off’ me (#3).

    Instead I see them as intelligent and compassionate people sticking up for a livable, affordable future for us all.

    I think these protesters are asking sensible questions about how we provide energy for ourselves today without rendering our grandchildren’s future unaffordable.

    As a tax-payer, I would like to see my taxes used with that affordable, low-carbon, sustainable future in mind.

    A report in Nature magazine in April 2009 concluded that three-quarters of the world’s fossil fuel reserves must be left unused if society is to avoid dangerous climate change.

    ian (#4) said the protesters are ‘idiots’.

    It would be great if he could explain to Shropshire Star readers why people are ‘idiots’ if they heed warnings like the above.

    Report abuse

    • twisting my melon

      ” Tunnels under the Wrekin ” indeed, They are about a mile from the Wrekin at least, and much nearer to the giant landfill. How the land between the Landfill and a golf course can be called an area of outstanding natural beauty is beyond me..

      Report abuse

      • Barbara

        I have to agree with Norman, if they’re doing nothing wrong why the mask?
        I’m just wonder what they’ll do when the seepage of methane from the landfill is ignited by their rizlas, I’ll tell you what muggins here will pay for some young firefighter to risk their lives to rescue them from their workings!

        Report abuse

        • Rob, Telford

          If I were them I’d be more worried about the blackdamp from the old coal workings which riddle the area.

          Report abuse

        • Graham

          Barbara I would guess this person would like to remain anonymous as there is a possibility that this individual will at some point be arrested, charged , heavily fined or sent to prison. Crazy I know. But sometimes the law is an ass.
          Sadly It will take plucky individuals like this, taking this type of action, that will make the difference between living on a sustainable planet or a toxic dump.

          As for the methane vents. People on site are very knowledgeable about this risk and take appropriate action. No one has any desire to blow themselves up !

          Report abuse

      • Huw Peach

        One of the world’s top climate scientists, NASA’s James Hansen, believes that ‘coal is the single greatest threat to civilization and all life on our planet.’

        Keeping it in the ground would thus seem a sensible course of action, while massively investing in low-carbon alternatives.

        What are your views, twisting?

        Report abuse

        • twisting my melon

          You like what James Hansen has to say therefore you believe it, perhaps..

          Report abuse

        • Rob, Telford

          “NASA’s James Hansen, believes that coal is the single greatest threat to civilization and all life on our planet.”

          Whereas others, myself included, believe that the biggest threat is the disproportionate squandering of ALL natural resources, especially by the americans, and uncontrolled population growth.

          Coal-burning is just one of the mechanisms involved – desertification brought about by over-grazing and salination caused by excessive and inappropriate irrigation are causing problems on a similar scale.

          Report abuse

  9. 9
    rob harris(retired hippy agitator)

    nice to see the young generation standing up for something they believe in,hope for us all yet!
    good luck lads and lasses, stick it to em!

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    James

    The knee jerk Daily Mail comments on here just demonstrate a total lack of intelligence of some people. It always makes me laugh when people go on about dole scroungers.

    Firstly, the welfare system is now so strict for anyone misfortunate to have to claim from it that it is very difficult circumnavigate and sponge.

    Secondly, most of our tax goes to pay for the profits of private companies that are parasitical on the public sector. PFI schemes, contracting out of services etc. cost the taxpayer billions each year and as experience has shown these services are oftem poorer or less value for money.

    Thirdly, there is the massive corporate tax evasion that the National Audit Office estimates to be £130 billion far greater than the estimated £250 million in benefit fraud that we hear so much about.

    Fourthly, we have just seen the biggest transfer of wealth from the taxpayer to UK PLC in living memory – the £1.3 trillion bank bail out. We are all paying for this unless your rich of course through the devaluation of our savings, job losses, spending cuts, wage freezes etc.

    So when I hear ignoramuses blurting dole scrounger it makes me very angry.

    The above post HuwPeach sums up nicely why it is important that people are up on the Wrekin. Why aren’t we investing in renewable technology like in Germany? Vested interests and huge profits for mining and fossil fuel extraction companies by any chance?

    Report abuse

    • Huw Peach

      Interesting post, James, and a very good question.

      Why AREN’T we investing in renewable technology?

      In April 2009 the South Korean government announced that it was investing 81% of its fiscal stimulus package (£23 billion) in renewable power, clean transport and energy-efficient buildings.

      In the UK it was 7%.

      Report abuse

  11. 11
    Noela

    I have met these people, talked to them, and found that they are very intelligent and determined people. They/we have jobs and as for myself, very good ones but that will not stop us doing what we are doing – we have ethics and morals and sometimes, just sometimes, you need to take a stand – better than than just watching TV and going to the pub. I wish them all the best of luck and I support them fully against the eco-terrorists UK Coal!

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    roadrunner

    “wisting my melon
    June 1, 2010 at 15:45

    ” Tunnels under the Wrekin ” indeed, They are about a mile from the Wrekin at least, and much nearer to the giant landfill. How the land between the Landfill and a golf course can be called an area of outstanding natural beauty is beyond me..”

    It appears that you don’t even know where they are?

    Report abuse

    • Rob, Telford

      According to the Friends of the Wrekin site:

      http://www.wrekinfriends.com/2008/01/18/Huntington-Lane-map-of-the-open-cast-mine

      “twisting my melon” gave a much more accurate llocation for the site, which is located to the east of Short Woods, running north from New Works to the M54, just south of Arleston.

      By no stretch of the imagination can they be said to have tunnelled under the Wrekin, unless they’ve got a very poor sense of direction.

      Report abuse

      • Rob, Telford

        Before anyone else points it out that’s the welsh spelling of location….. :>)

        Report abuse

        • twisting my melon

          Thankyou Rob, they’re even lying about the location now in a desperate attempt to drum up support. The people of Telford want jobs in the area not protesters. This does not make them conforming Daily mail reading sheep by the way..

          Keep up with the insults James and Graham, they’re really doing your protest the power of good..

          Report abuse

  13. 13
    Andy

    As an electricity user living in Wellington, I say let them take the fuel and put the land back as soon as they can. They can only take it once.

    I would imagine that 30 years ago these people would be protesting about the closure of pits rather than the digging of new ones.

    Report abuse

    • Huw Peach

      30 years ago climate science as we know it today did not exist, Andy.

      There was a majority view in the scientific community, but no consensus on global warming, and thus the damaging effects for the climate of burning coal were still being debated in the scientific literature.

      According to a paper in the Bulletin of American Meteorological Society (September 2008) entitled ‘The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus’, between 1965 and 1979 7 articles predicted cooling and 44 predicted warming.

      I would imagine that 30 years ago, in 1980, if the scientific consensus on the dangers of burning coal was as strong as it is today, then our transition to a low-carbon future would have started much earlier.

      Report abuse

      • winja

        What?!?!

        So by 1979, 44 out of 52 scientific articles predicted global warming, yet decided it was unimportant until 2008?!?!?

        Report abuse

        • Huw Peach

          We know you have made up your mind about global warming, winja. ( http://www.shropshirestar.com/latest/2010/02/12/letter-just-wait-for-the-summer/ #5)

          However, just because you think it is unimportant doesn’t mean those scientists, who predicted warming, did 30 years ago.

          For more information about the PR campaign to deny the seriousness of global warming, I recommend ‘Climate Cover Up’ by Canadian authors, James Hoggan and Richard Littlemore.

          For a more scientific approach, this book might be interesting: ‘Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming’ (Bloomsbury) by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M Conway.

          Report abuse

        • winja

          If we all know my stance on ANTHROPOGENIC global wombling, Huw (there is a critical difference between that and global warming), then why waste keystrokes on regurgitating what I was already happy to state / comment on in a public domain?

          For more information (for those already reading this) on the campaign by “soft” climate “scientists” to intimidate, blackball, misinform, and generally bad-mouth any other scientist who had the temerity to question their – generally – shoddy, slack, poorly interpreted, and very selective results from doctored and tortured raw data, and how the abuse of peer-review really works, I would suggest a quick google for John P Costella.

          For a more scientific approach, I would suggest a quick google for the paper by Baliunas & Soon (a random choice, but effective nonetheless).

          Finally, with regard to your support for Hansen and his NASA cohorts, Huw, perhaps you should do a search for the expose on a rather embarrassing gaffe by NASA’s Gavin Schmidt concerning full surface energy balance equations.

          Report abuse

    • Graham

      Andy the times are a changing. 30 years ago the issue was not so much about the coal. The govenment set out to destroy the National Union Of Miners. They were the “enemy within ” as the Thatcher govenment said. Once the were out of the way the country was subjected to massive privitization of public assets by the Thatcher govenment. The roll out of the ” Free Market ideology ” a mantle that New Labour took forward is at the heart of today’s economic crisis.James has made some good comments on the results of this in post 10.

      So in the last 30 years events and greater knowledge of our impact on the environment call for a new set of thinking and solutions to the problems we all face. As Huw pointed out burning more coal is adding to the predicted ecological collapse. They may take it out once but to continue blindly burning coal will be disastrous.

      The land will never be restored to it’s former state.

      Report abuse

  14. 14
    roadrunner

    Sorry Rob but looking at the map on the friends of the wrekin site it appears that where they say it is , is also where you describe it BUT NOT where twisted melon seems to think it is, between the golf course and landfill site…confused? Some of us are!

    The area around the shortwoods is indeed an area of natural beauty…until the trees start getting destroyed anyway.

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    roadrunner

    And the northern half of the site?

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    Huw Peach

    Rob, Telford, you said (June 3, 2010 at 11:41, responses to #8) you ‘believe that the biggest threat is the disproportionate squandering of ALL natural resources, especially by the americans.’

    In that case, what do you think of President Obama’s June 2nd proposal “to aggressively accelerate” the USA’s transition from oil to alternative sources of energy?

    Report abuse

    • Rob, Telford

      An excellent start, if it comes off. I can’t say I’m a big fan of nuclear power as one of the alternatives though. I still feel that there should be a greater emphasis on reducing levels of energy consumption, and population control has got to be part of the solution.

      Report abuse

      • Huw Peach

        If government did what you wanted and invested massively in reducing levels of energy consumption through a policy of free home insulation for all, ordinary people would save on heating bills, carbon emissions would be cut, the economy would benefit from the stimulus and thousands of new jobs could be created across the country.

        An accelerated, government-funded transition into a low-carbon economy through massive investment in renewable energy would also create more jobs than are currently provided by fossil-fuels.

        You approve of Obama’s aspirations to green the US economy, Rob.

        How aggressive do you think our government should be about promoting the transition to alternative sources of energy?

        Report abuse

  17. 17
    roadrunner

    Rob, despite your evasiveness, you can’t deny that the F of W are correct in saying that the NORTHERN HALF of the intended coal site is between the short woods and arleston so WHY deny it??? Friends of the Wrekin ( who I have nothing to do with) have never claimed that the coal mining would affect the wrekin.

    Report abuse

    • Rob, Telford

      Errr, “evasiveness”???

      Please read the following from 3 days ago:

      “Rob, Telford
      June 2, 2010 at 11:36

      According to the Friends of the Wrekin site:

      http://www.wrekinfriends.com/2008/01/18/Huntington-Lane-map-of-the-open-cast-mine

      “twisting my melon” gave a much more accurate llocation for the site, which is located to the east of Short Woods, running north from New Works to the M54, just south of Arleston.

      By no stretch of the imagination can they be said to have tunnelled under the Wrekin, unless they’ve got a very poor sense of direction.

      Read more: http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2010/05/29/wrekin-campaigners-digging-in-for-a-fight/#ixzz0pz8UkFWj

      Which you replied to. All I have attempted to do is make it clear exactly where the site is located, which you apparently interpret as “evasiveness”.

      As for the relevance (or otherwise) to the Wrekin, may I refer you back to the first sentence of the original story at the top of this page: “Green campaigners have moved into secret tunnels under The Wrekin”.

      For what it’s worth, I have previously commented on this web site and elsewhere that the whole scheme is less to do with coal and more to do with making even more land available for excessive housing development.

      You’ve admitted previously to being confused – now you’re just attacking people who agree with you.

      Report abuse

  18. 18
    roadrunner

    My main concern is propoganda put up by UK coal supporters such as the twisted melon, who accuse Friends of the Wrekin of lying, when in fact I would expect that when all the coal is mined, that Uk Coal will be the ones found to be lying, when the land is not returned to it’s natural state or improved but used for housing, as the shortwoods site has housing potential for over 300 houses.

    Report abuse

  19. 19
    Magistersampson@aol.com

    Nice to see that there is so much debate and comment about the propsed Opencast Mine – if finally, peoples awareness of this plan is becoming greater, then half the battle is won already.
    UK COALs shares are in total freefall – what a shame for those who choose to invest in as Nick Clegg said in his pre election success speech, “we are against dirty coal fired power production”.
    If UK COAL go bankrupt in the very near future -( and thats one of the reasons for their hesitance to start working this site – the shareholders wont put up the money for astart ), then good, its one less removal of part of our much needed strategic reserve of energy that may be needed in future.
    If the Protesters at the Camp are helping the shares to plummet – good onthem,I hope the Summer brings hundreds more , and then the Camp can expand to the South site, towards Little Wenlock, and the North site towards Dawley Road, thus closing any hope of UK COAL for working anytime in the future.
    Well done to those who really care about the environment locally – and beyond.
    Magister.

    Report abuse

  20. 20
    roadrunner

    “You’ve admitted previously to being confused – now you’re just attacking people who agree with you.”

    Not attacking you Rob, just didn’t want people to assume that twisted melon was 100% accurate by saying that the only area involved is the southern half between candles tip and wrekin golf course, which is what he was implying.

    I know they are no where near the wrekin but at the same time they are ruining a lovely ancient wood, i.e the short woods.

    Report abuse

  21. 21
    Huw Peach

    winja, in response to your comments on thread #13 (June 4, 2010 at 19:55), it is hard to know what to reply to you.

    Do you really stand by your statement that climate scientists all produce ‘shoddy, slack, poorly interpreted, and very selective results from doctored and tortured raw data’?

    Just so that Shropshire Star readers can understand your position, could you clarify to them how far back in time your ‘scepticism’ goes.

    In the 1850s and 1860s, physicist John Tyndall proved that there was a Greenhouse Effect, and that the gases nitrogen, oxygen, water vapour, carbon dioxide, ozone, and methane absorb heat.

    Do you accept Tyndall’s findings from the 1860s that carbon dioxide, which is released when burning coal, absorbs heat and contributes to the greenhouse effect, winja?

    Or do you regard Tyndall’s well-established science as, in your words, ‘shoddy, slack, poorly interpreted, very selective, doctored and tortured’?

    It would be interesting to know at what stage during the long history of climate science your ‘scepticism’ begins?

    Report abuse

  22. 22
    Huw Peach

    Svante Arrhenius, who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1903, was the first scientist to predict that CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels like coal would cause global warming.

    Arrhenius thought, however, that warming would be a good thing and he did not foresee the rapid rise of industrial CO2 emissions of the 20th century.

    He thought that it would take 3,000 years for levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to double.

    Based on the eye-watering speed with which we are burning up our fossil fuel resources, most scenarios now say it will take about 100 years.

    Are you also ‘sceptical’ about Arrhenius’ discoveries, winja?

    And if so, on what basis?

    The protesters clearly feel the science -whose origins date back to the 1850s and 1860s- is strong enough, and are willing to risk arrest and their physical well-being to influence the way we provide energy for ourselves in future.

    It would be great if one climate change denying supporter of open-cast coal mining was willing to risk a response to a couple of rational questions.

    Report abuse

  23. 23
    Huw Peach

    winja, I googled some of your (June 4, 2010 at 19:55) references this afternoon.

    John P. Costella, according to his interestingly titled website, assassinationscience, has lots of info about JFK’s assassination as well as the climate e-mail piece you mentioned, which I didn’t read for obvious reasons.

    Do you think associating with conspiracy theorists helps or hinders your points about climate change?

    Report abuse

  24. 24
    Huw Peach

    You also referenced Baliunas & Soon.

    I quickly discovered a huge amount of information about Willie Soon and his contrarian view that the sun (not CO2) is warming the planet from an excellent online slide-show-audio lecture by a thermal sciences professor at the University of St Thomas in Minnesota, called John Abraham.

    (Just google ‘John Abraham’s reply to Lord Christopher Monckton’)

    In an exhaustive rebuttal of arguments about anthropogenic climate change promoted by UKIP Deputy leader, Lord Christopher Monckton, (whose position is remarkably similar to yours, winja), John Abraham devotes slides 86-104 to explaining what the overwhelming majority of peer-reviewed academic papers say about the sun’s influence on the earth’s temperature and to who Willie Soon is.

    Soon’s published papers have been funded by the American Petroleum Institute, the Mobil Foundation and the Electric Power Foundation (which have a very clear vested interest in this policy debate), and he has also been associated with Western Fuels, Greening Earth Foundation, the Heartland Foundation, the George C. Marshall Institute and Tech Station Central.

    I hope Shropshire Star readers find this extra context helpful.

    I look forward to hearing from you, winja.

    In the meantime, good luck to the protesters!

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.