Romolo, Shrewsbury
Monday 16th May 2011, 2:12PM BST.
Rating: ** A visit to Romolo leaves a slightly sour taste in our reviewer Andy Richardson’s mouth.
Offer me a food tour of any nation and I’d choose Italy every time. Despite a penchant for the sashimi of Japan and the cheeses of France, nothing comes close to Italy in terms of great produce that reflects one of the world’s great food nations.
There is so much to enjoy. Vibrant tastes that reflect the changing seasons, intense explosions of flavour from delicious fruit and vegetables, wonderfully high quality meat and a catch of the freshest fish and shellfish.
Great Italian food is predicated on brilliant seasonal flavour, chefs tend not to over-elaborate, they let the ingredients do the talking.
So my friend and I visited Shrewsbury’s Romolo restaurant with high expectations.
Our last visit was when the restaurant first opened and, on that occasion, it had impressed by keeping things simple.
The service had been warm and welcoming, the food had been the star attraction.
We called in on a Thursday evening, when it was surprisingly quiet with only a small number of other diners present.
The waitress offered a wan smile, rather than the warm greeting we may have expected, and we were shown to a delightful table overlooking the River Severn.
Romolo has much going for it and ought to be full most evenings. It has an enviable location, at Victoria Quay, overlooking the Welsh Bridge and the winding waters of the Severn.
It is near to some of the area’s best bars – The Armoury and Frank both have a loyal clientele – and it has a cocktail lounge of its own on the first floor.
It’s also run by one of the most respected restaurant teams in the county, with its proprietors having years and years in the business.
With so many positives, however, Romolo somehow contrived to offer a thoroughly underwhelming experience.
The maitre d seemed uninterested and disengaged while the food was a let-down.
My friend started with gamberi alla cesare, a platter of prawns on a crispy salad with shavings of Grana Padano and a classic Cesar dressing.
It was spoiled by the heavy handedness of the chef, who had drenched the plate with dressing, wiping out all other flavours with a tsunami of sauce.
I opted for the Bruchetta ai funghi, comprising pan-fried mushrooms on a toasted garlic bread with truffle oil and Grana Padano.
It was constructed with ham-fistedness and I was unable to finish it. The mushrooms were pleasant enough but the bread was drenched in far too much oil, as though it were an oleaginous sponge. It was, simply, inedible.
My friend took the delizia di mare alla Toscana for her main, a fish and prawn pie cooked in a white wine, vegetable and cream sauce and topped with mashed potato.
It was the only dish of the evening that passed muster.
I went for the petto di pollo alla cacciatore, a free range chicken breast cooked with a tomato, red wine, pancetta, mushrooms and garlic sauce that was served with pesto potato gnocchi.
The chicken was overcooked, so that it had become stringy, while the slick of oil beneath it was unpleasant. The dominant taste was oil and a 5mm slick had formed across the bottom of the bowl.
It oblitered the more-delicate flavours of the basil, though the robust and punch red wine sauce was able to stand its ground.
The desserts weren’t much better. The lemon syllabub was lacking in sophistication while the ice cream lacked the dreamy creaminess of the gelatos that are found in Italy.
On the face of it, Romolo has much going for it.
Maybe we visited on an off-night, when the minds of the staff were elsewhere.
With a lighter touch in the kitchen and greater engagement on the part of the staff, it should again become one of the town’s more impressive locales – sadly, those qualities were absent on our latest visit.
ADDRESS
Romolo, Victoria Quay, Shrewsbury SY1 1HH
Telephone: 01743 233244
Web: www.romolo.co.uk
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
We have eaten at Romolo’s several times and this review was something of a surprise. We’ve never had a bad meal and the lights upstairs in the bar area make it very glam. I hope it’s true that soon they will also be able to have tables outside – what a great setting on a sunny evening by the river.
Report abuse
I can only think that the reviewer had gone when the restaurant was having a bad day and lets face it it does happen in any business.
I’ve eaten several times at Romolo and each time it was perfection. Not only was the food a delight but also the staff were very attentive and even the Chef Claudio came out to say hello and check if everything was ok with our meal.
As someone who had been in the restaurant business myself for 14 years (no longer thankfully), you can imagine that any place I go I can be hyper critical and everything is examined from the very start to the very end and Romolo has yet to let me down.
Report abuse
I’ve lunched at Romolo three times now and can only commend them on their fantastic food, pleasant service and good value. Each time, each dish has been delectable and their Sticky Toffee Pudding is, quite simply, to die for.
Given Shrewsbury’s poor range of mid-priced eateries, this restaurant is a true gem.
Report abuse
look at this reviewer’s piece on Pizza Express. Same hyperbole and pretentiousness. For goodness’ sake, Mr Richardson you’re a jobbing reporter on a local newspaper with no more expertise in restaurants and cuisine than the man on the Oswestry omnibus (who would be much less pompous).
I and friends have eaten at Romolo and never had any problem. Perhaps it’s personal Mr Richardson?!
Report abuse
Could not of said it better myself!
Report abuse
I have to agree with these comments, I do find this particular reporter can go from one extreme to the other. I fail to understand how these types of reviews are done by journalist’s, personally I would rather read a reviewer from a reader.
Report abuse
Jobbing reporter! Oh dear, my illusions have been shattered. After all, somebody who can spell gamberi alla cesare, delizia di mare alla Toscana, bruchetta and gnocchi must have some knowledge of exquisite Italian cuisine? I’ll never be able to trust another Star dining review again.
Report abuse
In the reviewer’s defence, his comments are echoed by several other reviews on the Eat Shrewsbury website (www.eatshrewsbury.co.uk).
Report abuse
As a part blood Italian (Grandmother & other family and part time living out there!) having read this, I can understand your disgust at the soaked oily bread in bruschetta as they should be light and crispy. However, with regards to the cacciatora, whereas I can see the chicken being disappointing to you in its texture as a British consumer, it’s a rustic dish! “Hunters’” chicken literally, so the English palate is possibly not so well suited to this kind of “poor man’s” dish. If I can imagine the dish the way you describe it, I wouldn’t really think it was far off from how we cook it, rabbit, turkey or chicken. Usually the chicken is cooked with the skin on still so it can be quite oily, and fried initially with onions and olive oil and rosemary traditionally. As a side, it’s usually served with a very oil heavy brustingi. By the sounds of it, you ordered the wrong dish for your particular “palate”. Perhaps you should try a more pretentious place and a lighter dish. Cacciatora is a very wholesome calorific meal and rustic. I cook this on our chestnut terraces in Ceriana on a camping stove! You need to see it for the meal it is! I have read several reviews from you and you seem a bit pompous and lacking in knowledge and expertise behind the dishes and technical knowledge in how dishes should be prepared. In general, you expect to be able to taste every flavour individually, but that’s definitely not how it works in cooking. I like to think of it, in layman’s terms, like the American jelly belly jelly beans. Individually they taste unique, combine a few and its hard to tell that they were once separate flavours as a different taste is created. Generally, Italian food isn’t about subtle flavours, its bold and its fantastic!
With regards to commenting on the poor waiter, you’re being perhaps a little unfair, dare I say racist, at stereotyping him in to a big jolly italian. They are human beings, I think it’s unfair to comment on a member of staff (not even management) in this manner. It’s a cheap unsubstantiated dig to try and back up your poor review. I think you’re expecting a British pompous -’s interpretation of Italian cooking.
Oh and Italian cooking isn’t that light on the oil. Especially in the North in Liguria and centrally in Umbria.
I hope you’re not one of these types that likes their lasagne cooked with mince meat as opposed to shin beef so that it becomes quite stringy and textured. Who puts balasamic vinegar on absolutely everything and likes everything with pesto. Pesto drives me mad, so overused inappropriately, a pub just outside of Shrewsbury over uses this. They put it with just about every starter and a significant amount of the mains they produce.
Quite frankly, you’re talking absolute tosh, I don’t find your review substantiated enough or credible!
And giving Pizza Express 2* review. They’re a cheap chain restaurant, their food is fine for their price, target market and under the management style they are. They’re just another good chain group that people can go out to, get a reasonable meal at a reasonable price and with a reasonable idea of what will be on the menu to avoid disappointments. I think you need to review in terms of what type of food outlet they are. Your ratings seem very misleading, inaccurate and with weak reasoning.
Report abuse
I am not surprised in the slightest that Romolos received a poor review. Our company had our Christmas lunch there, which was very disappointing. Cold gloopy gravy, tinned strawberries in a so called ‘Italian’ trifle, inattentive service…the list goes on.
Report abuse
I totally agree with the review, the food is awful and vey low quality as having dined there twice i have felt very cheated as the decor is nice but the food isnt.
Having dined here two times and left unhappy at the dining experience of Romolo neither my friends, family and i will be returning again.
Report abuse
Interesting how two comments supporting the reviewer have emerged right at the end. Good to have friends and family…
Report abuse
Firstley I would like to say that I eat at Romolo’s on a regular basis and I have always had good food and service.
I am concerned that his type of review even apears in the star, we live in a very difficult times in the hospitality industry and every penny is important .If this type of scathing and unwarrented review has lost Romolo’ even one customer then shame on you Andy Richardson ,perhaps your goal in life should be more focused on helping local hospitality business. my advertising buget will most certainly never got to the Star until the editor’s star doing the job.
Report abuse
Disagree. I’d rather have an honest review than lots of fake ones designed only to pat every business on the back, regardless of how badly they were treating their customers.
If a restaurant is providing a poor service, then it is up to them to do something about it. Calling for some kind of super injunction on local press, so that we can go about thinking that every restaurant in town is of 5 star quality, is foolish.
Yes we should support local businesses, but not if they cannot or will not provide a decent return for our money.
Report abuse
I’d agree with the sentiment about not just having positive reviews.
However a review appearing in the local press may have a disproportionate impact. For that reason the newspsaper has a responsibility to ensure that there’s a balanced view rather than rely on the eccentric reporting of one “reviewer”. How about sending two different people to the same place a couple of weeks apart and presenting their views side by side?
What several people object to is the posturing by this particular “reviewer”. He’s no more qualified than anyone else to write comments but dresses his up in a pseudo-expertise style. He gilds his unqualified views in a way that attempts to suggest he has a vast knowledge of dining and food. In fact he is just one of several reporters who are employed to cover everything from road accidents to crime to business and so on. Jack of all trades and certainly not a master of food reviewing!
Report abuse
I like the part where he describes a dish as inedible and also that he failed to finish it.
If it is inedible, then you’d have failed to start it!
“a 5mm slick had formed across the bottom of the bowl.”
How on earth did you know it was 5mm?
Andy Richardson is a very poor food critic who misses out much detail in his quest for hyberbole.
What was the wine list like Andy? What did you have to drink? How much did it all cost?
Any reviewer who fails to cover the basics like this has no right to be writing in a widely circulated newspaper that may impact on people’s businesses.
Report abuse