Mistake for mine protester
Wednesday 7th April 2010, 1:37PM BST.
A lone protester today attempted to block what she thought was a coal lorry from entering a site earmarked for an opencast mine in Telford – but picked on the wrong vehicle.
The startled driver was confronted by the campaigner who stood in his way and refused to budge until she had voiced her protest.
The incident happened shortly after 8am near a protest camp which has sprung up next to the Huntington Lane site in Little Wenlock where UK Coal is set to mine 900,000 tonnes of coal.
“Dawn”, one of the anti-coal campaigners stopping at the makeshift camp, said the protesters felt disheartened by the failure of today’s action.
She said the driver of the lorry, which was delivering to a nearby farm, told her he was not going to the site.
UK Coal spokesman Stuart Oliver said today: “The lorry had nothing at all to do with UK Coal.
“We would suggest it was an irresponsible act and contrary to what the protesters say they are there to do.”
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
What an easy target to mock and ridicule. Someone bothered enough to get off their sofa and get out there and at least try to carry through their convictions whether or not you personally agree with them or not. Seems the UK Coal PR department have found a loyal friend in the Star.
Report abuse
What a bunch of idiots,UK Coal should lift another 100,000t of Coal each time one of these muppets causes a rational human being aggravation.I live within 2 miles of the Wrekin and wish these idiots would stop their stupid protest.
Report abuse
bigbeast said:
“What an easy target to mock and ridicule”
Errr, I can only suggest that you found it funny – I can’t see where the article mocked or ridiculed anyone.
Report abuse
Personally I find this story very funny.
And then it gets twisted around as if the protesters wanted to stop the wrong vehicle!
Good luck to the protesters anyway. The whole coal mining thing is such a short term profit for what? best wait a few more years when energy prices are double or triple what they are now.
The ironic thing is that if the protesters do manage to stop the mining for now – UK coal stands to make much more profit in future when they do eventually start!
Report abuse
Making mistakes is human.
I make mistakes every day, and I regret them in the same way that Dawn clearly regrets what she did, according to the unnamed author of the article above.
However, some mistakes are costlier than others.
Coal companies might concede in 50 years time that open-cast mining in beauty spots was a ‘mistake’.
Or that it was a ‘mistake’ to burn coal in 2010 without any attempt whatsoever at carbon capture.
Coal companies, looking at their tattered credibility in 50 years’ time, might also concede that it was a ‘mistake’ to spend money on PR campaigns denying anthropogenic climate change (see ‘Climate Cover-Up’ by Richard Littlemore (Greystone Books, 2009).
But are the above examples of ‘mistakes’ or of wilful disregard for the present and the future?
Every national science academy that has issued a statement on climate change has stated that that human activities are contributing adversely to global climate change.
NASA’s James Hansen says that burning coal is ‘the single greatest threat to civilisation and all life on our planet.’ (The Observer, Sunday 15 February 2009)
For these reasons I support the protesters, and wish them courage in their David and Goliath struggle against mostly nameless adversaries.
All of us make mistakes, but the big question is: which mistakes will we remember in 10, 20 or 50 years time?
My hunch is, it won’t be Dawn’s.
Report abuse
Huw Peach said..Coal companies might concede in 50 years time that open-cast mining in beauty spots was a ‘ mistake ‘
Or they may look at the Granville country park today and think, ” that looks rather nice, i wonder what used to be there “.
Report abuse
twisting my melon said:
‘Huw Peach said..Coal companies might concede in 50 years time that open-cast mining in beauty spots was a ‘ mistake ‘
Or they may look at the Granville country park today and think, ” that looks rather nice, i wonder what used to be there “. ‘
Or they might look at another huge housing estate and think “if we hadn’t had the excuse of digging a bit of coal this lot would still be open countryside”.
Report abuse
“Or they may look at the Granville country park today and think, ” that looks rather nice, i wonder what used to be there “. ”
Twisting,
Firstly, “what used to be there”, was countryside before the Granville colliery.
Secondly, the Granville colliery was one of the biggest collieries around employing many more men, over many more years, than this piffling little site, which , as Rob suggests, is more of an excuse to build more housing estates on beauty spots, than economic sense.
Report abuse
Give it a rest please Huw. Yawn Yawn.
Report abuse
Re. “Roadrunner” @ 8
Granville, like other deep mines, worked UNDER the countryside – the surface installations and waste heaps occupied a few acres, the area mined extended over several thousand – the last face worked (329′s if I remember correctly, although it was over 30 years ago) was way out the other side of Lilleshall.
Granville employed about 640 in the last few years – skilled, confident and errr, living locally, doing what they had been told was a job with a future (not long before Granville was supposed to have had 70 years of economically workable reserves).
Instead we’ve now got open cast “mining” of low grade coal in the rush to build more houses (instant “brownfield” land).
I won’t get into the environmental argument about coal being the filthiest and most polluting fuel – enough lies have been told on both sides. Suffice it to say that we now import coal that is often mined in lethal conditions, sometimes by children, when we are sitting on hundreds of years of reserves that could have provided a secure fuel supply and provided employment for miners in what was the safest mining industry in the world (which was also the base for the world’s largest mining machinery industry – when our rulers vented their spite on the miners they also killed off a massive sector of our manufacturing industry – what happened to Anderson Strathclyde, Dowty Meco, Gullick Dobson, Huwood and dozens of smaller firms that led the world in mining technology?).
But hey – we’ve still got hedge-betting, investment banking and the rest of the financial services “industry”.
Report abuse
I’m intrigued and interested by what you said about “lies on both sides”, Rob. I found your potted history of the mine and its workers genuinely interesting and your angle on this issue fascinating. But I hope Charlie Drake won’t mind me asking what exactly you meant about “lies on both sides.”
Report abuse
Shame the Star didnt give all the facts – the lorry stopped contained a digger being delivered to a UK Coal owned Farm in the South mine site – to a Tenant farmer whose landlord is UK Coal.
UK Coal workman just happened to be at the land next to the farm at the same time of delivery.
What a co -incidence!
bet they wont let this comment be published.
COTEYG
Report abuse
Shame you cannot substantiate what you said,Rob.
Thanks for the explanation, Pat.
Keep up the good work.
Report abuse
Thanks to the Star for actuually printing a comment!
Also to Huw – appreciate that.
You might all like to check out the Sustainable Communities Act Of Parliament – instilled by this Government in 2007 – its on the All Friends Around the Wrekin webpage, and it gives local Authorities responsibility for maintaining the Act – and the distance Sustainable fuels such as Coal in this case, can legally be transported, from source to use.
Pat,
COTEYG.
Report abuse