Awful legacy of teen pregnancies
Wednesday 10th March 2010, 8:01AM GMT.
Letter: After 13 years in power Labour’s policy to tackle Britain’s awful record of western Europe’s teenage pregnancy capital is in tatters.
Tony Blair said in 1999 that Labour had a target to slash in half the number of teen pregnancies by 2012.
But new figures say 40 per 1,000 under-18s still fall pregnant, compared with a figure in 1998 of 46 per 1,000. This is after spending more than £285m on contraception and sex education, despite this dismal outcome
I think one of the main reasons behind Britain’s high rate of teenage pregnancy is the breakdown of the family unit. This has been fuelled by Government policies, such as the end of tax relief for married couples, also accommodation and large handouts to lone parents. The consequences are there for all to see in rising rates of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.
It is time for old values like personal respect, dignity and responsibility to be taught again.
P B Johnston
Shrewsbury
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Instead of spending so much money on sex education… how about teaching a little about morality?
Report abuse
It’s because the Government give better benefits too easily for people who are too lazy to go out and look for work.
I know of several young teenagers who purposefully got pregnant in the belief (from examples shown by their own parents and friends who are young mothers) of how easy it is to have their own home with multiple benefits living off tax payers money with ‘parental’ status. I also know people who ‘claim’ to be single parents in order to gain more benefits.
Friends with young children who have tried to gain employment to work for their own money were actually advised by Citizens Advice Bureau that they are financially better off claiming benefits than taking on part-time/full-time employment. So to some extent I can understand (but not agree with) why people are wanting to take the easy way in life seeing as the Government make it so easy for them. Why bother busting a gut on minimum wage to pay rent, taxes, childminders and other living expenses and barely have enough disposable income at the end of the week/month when you can sit back and watch other people work the next 50 years of their lives to support their easy lifestyle?
Having worked for a Housing Association I have experienced people demanding it is “their right” to be given a home as they have “just become pregnant” as well as people who play the “disability card” on examples such as ‘panic attacks when at work therefore “allergic” to work’ yet they somehow find the courage to go out every weekend to get drunk from their benefits money.
Young people these days are exposed enough to pregnancy prevention through sex education at school and other means such as magazines, newspapers and internet access to know of the consequences of unprotected sex. I don’t think it’s so much that education on the importance of family units need to be enforced, rather that the Government needs to stop handing out tax payers money so easily to people who want to take the easy way in life and maybe give these benefits to people who actually want to make the effort to EARN their money.
Report abuse
No surprise here folks. Some Parents are too thick to understand whets going on. Change the law to only allow future parents who pass an IQ test to be parents. Those who fail STERLISE so their genes are not entered into the human race?
Report abuse
I take issue with the letter writer’s use of the phrase “fall pregnant”. Pregnancy is not an illness so one doesn’t amazingly “fall” pregnant.
I’m with Mr. Finch – morality should be taught. Pregnancy should only happen when a Mommy and a Daddy love each other very much.
Report abuse
Julie, I could’nt agree more.
I would also agree that morals and dignity needs to be taught and punishment for the parents.
Report abuse
At last a letter writer who knows where to place the blame – yes the government have broken down the family unit and consequentially morals and values – parents are either no longer home to bring their children up because they’re too busy working all the hours god sends to pay the bills or yes, it doesn’t pay some parents particularly lone parents to work because the wages will not make up what they lose in benefits and increased rent and council tax payments (as demonstrated on last nights bbc programme whereby even celebs are admitting they’d defraud the system in this scenario!)
Businesses struggle with the parent back to work issue because as much as they support it, if mum or dad suddenly have to take time off because Junior is ill how does the work get done then? The business still has to go on for the benefit of everyone working there so does Mr. Boss run the risk of workloads backsliding thus losing customers due to parental absence or does he (quietly and illegally) discriminate against the working parent? It’s a catch 22 for both parent and employer which the government has created and but will not support either party in any practical manner.
Report abuse
A) “But new figures say 40 per 1,000 under-18s still fall pregnant, compared with a figure in 1998 of 46 per 1,000.”
B) “The consequences are there for all to see in rising rates of teen pregnancy………”
It is time for something to be taught, that much is true.
Report abuse
Andrew,
You are quite wrong if you don’t believe that topics such as morality and responsibility are taught in leassons such as PSHE in our schools.
All of the evidence is that many young girls getting pregnant are ignorant of good advice on sexual health and contraception, an ignorance which I’m afraid is aided by the approach of some religious groups.
Fortunately we no longer typically indoctrinate children with religious beliefs in school, preferring to educate properly rather than force a particular narrow view upon them, but I think too many people still have too narrow a definition of what might constitute a viable, successful ‘family’, and somehow believe that morality or ‘family values’ are owned in some way by religions.
It seems to me that all the evidence points to us needing more sex education rather than less.
Like Julie, I despair at young women who fall for the widespread urban myth that having a child is somehow a passport to a better life – they couldn’t be more wrong in most cases, as they find out to their regret.
But what do we do? Can we visit the ‘sins’ of the parents on the children? I don’t think that’s reasonable. Perhaps the answer is to remove any cash component altogether, and ensure that the children are properly provided for, but with direct supply of the items and services they need, thus preventing the money going on other things.
Report abuse
there was a feature in the shropshire star, last week, on teenage pregnancy, i think you all need to get to know a few teenage parents and realise that, it is not always teenage parents from broken homes with no morals and dignity,
I’m quite angry that are still narrow minded people in regards to teenage pregnancy, certain teenage girls will come from broken homes and wish to claim benefits as a way of life, but others will also try to change the upbringing they had into a positive light, and realise there were mistakes being made in those broken homes. But what is being done by these people to fix these broken homes before teenagers go and have sex? I would also like to point out not every adolescent girl who gets pregnant is from a broken home. Myself included, i was a main part of the feature on teenage pregnancy, gave up my child for adoption at the age of 14, had another at 17, I’m now 26, and am about too enter a career in social care which i have studied hard for as well as bringing up my child and caring for my father, which is no mean feat, so well you all complain about teenage mothers stuck claiming benefits, you think about what everyone is doing while claiming those benefits. the majority of us will not sit about on our backsides watching or taking part in jeremy kyle, the majority of us are great examples of society. unlike a certain few who demoralise and demonise us because we are young parents.
Report abuse
Also where are these large handouts and the accomodation? have you tried surviving on little over £100 pounds a week, saving a little bit in case your washing machine breaks down, or the oven blows up? even then you know you wont have enough to cover it. what kind of choice is that too make?
As for the accomodation side of things, social housing is there for everyone who needs it, and unless you make yourself homeless as a teenage parent and get moved into a hostel and then get put into a pokey flat with a young baby. there is often a long waiting list of at LEAST 4 years, if your current family home is not overcrowded.
Report abuse
Ian formby said:
“No surprise here folks. Some Parents are too thick to understand whets going on. Change the law to only allow future parents who pass an IQ test to be parents. Those who fail STERLISE so their genes are not entered into the human race? ”
This IQ test Ian – it wouldn’t be a written test by any chance? Which method of “sterlisation” would you prefer?
Report abuse
Dawn – don’t get angry…PB Johnston doesn’t know the difference between rising and lowering, ignores the fact that the rate was
50.6/1000 in 1996 some 4 years before the end of the Married Persons Tax Allowance, chucks in STDs as if it were relevant to his argument rather than supportive of the money spent on contraception opposite view, imagines that ‘old values’ ceased to be taught in 1997 (when clearly if they had it’s had the effect of lowering the rate of teen pregnancies – causality not proven either way natch)….basically not worth getting angry about. Best of luck and enjoy your career.
Report abuse
Nistagmus … hitting nails firmly on the head since 1975. Well played sir
Report abuse
@Andrew: I also wonder if chastity is part of the sex education curriculum.
Report abuse
Chastity is not a name commonly used these days and i have never heard of it being used as a boys name. Funny that!
Report abuse
Nistagmus, Peter, and Dawn…well said. Dawn you are heading into a difficult but worthwhile career where your experiences of life so far and willingness to see beyond the routinely accepted or norms will stand you in good stead. We have a high teenage pregnancy rate in this country for many reasons including poor sex and relationship education. Government and educators want to improve this but the religious/moral minority twist and resist. The consequences are there to be seen, but there are multiple other reasons. That life was simply black and white would be so easy, but this, like other issues is more complex. P B Johnson’s world view is one that does not register with me.
Report abuse
It is all down to family breakdown. I question whether it is down to the daily mail tripe “its to do with benefits etc” a few maybe but not all most are accidents however it is far deeper than that.Of course it use to happen years ago but the girls were sent away or married off it was covered up. Perhaps if you pop over to italy and see what the answer there is for teenage pregnancies?? that could be the answer here.
Report abuse
It would be far more sustainable for you to inform us of your Latin pearls of wisdom, Andrew.
Good post Simon and Dawn, it is a relief that Shropshire has got some residents who have moved on from the dark ages.
Report abuse
Teenage girls want to go out and have sex, some say they are cautious, but clearly quite a few aren’t.
It’s a mindset. “A cool thing to do!”
Report abuse
Sack half of them and the rest will have to work harder for less money…….sorry, i seem to have activated Andrew Finches’ automated answer for everything machine.
Report abuse
It’s all very well of you to blame the government for creating family breakdown and then giving out too many benefits, but where would our core vote come from if we let people look after themselves? No, creating more dependence on the state = more state power. Lovely!
Report abuse
spencer said:
“sorry, i seem to have activated Andrew Finches’ automated answer for everything machine.”
Wasn’t that a prototype for the ‘Stuart MkIII Lofty Superiority Generator’? If so I’d be very careful – it’s supposed to be less reliable than a Toyota accelerator……
Report abuse
“Teenage girls want to go out and have sex,”
Who with, each other? How come the girls get all the blame?
Report abuse
Quite so Kath !
What do you think about:
[“A cool thing to do!”]
I,ve always found it makes me quite hot! :)
Report abuse
scrap the benefits and bing back the workhouse. onl way people will learn
Report abuse
“scrap the benefits and bing back the workhouse. onl way people will learn”
It would be nice if they learned to spell.
Report abuse
teenagers will go out and have sex, its nothing new, its just fortunately in this day and age, that we’re no longer outcasts of society having our babies taken away and dealing with years of oppressed grief
Report abuse
i work with pregnant teenagers,most of these girls(there are exceptions to this)just want to love and be loved back,somthing that is lacking not only in their lives but also in the lives of their parents.this is generations worth of damage,no magic wand is going to solve this problem overnight.Speaking from personal experience my sister had her first baby at 17 yrs is now a successful business woman and mother,we shouldn’t just write them all off.
Report abuse