Council ‘hypocritical’ for leaving 80 lights on

Tuesday 23rd February 2010, 10:35AM GMT.

StreetlightsEighty street lights in Telford are being left on 24 hours a day – just days after it was revealed some main roads could be blacked out at night to save cash and help the environment.

Pensioner Eric Lewis branded Telford & Wrekin Council hypocritical for taking no action to turn the lights off during the day in Lawley Village despite him lodging three complaints in the last 21 days.

He said the lights – from the M54 island down to Lawley traffic lights, up to Dawley Bank and in the opposite direction to Lawley Church – had been left on for three weeks.

But Telford & Wrekin Council insisted the street lights remaining on would not cost taxpayers any money. The authority is currently proposing switching off 1,350 street lights on six A-roads in the borough from midnight to 5.30am. A decision is due to be made in March.

It claims the move would result in a saving of £76,000-a-year from the authority’s £1 million lighting budget.

But Mr Lewis said: “I could not believe it when I read of the plans to switch off all those street lights. I find it very hypocritical that they can talk of reducing the carbon footprint and saving money and yet take no action at all with regard to these lights at Lawley Village.”

Councillor Adrian Lawrence, council cabinet member for environment and rural area, said it will not cost the council any extra money.

The roads being considered for the big switch-off include the A442 Eastern Primary, A4169 Ironbridge bypass, A464 Hollinswood Interchange, A5223 Wellington Road in Oakengates, A518 Newport to Stafford Road and the A5.


  1. 1
    quinny

    The council insist it wont cost the taxpayers any money. So who exactly will fund the cost of these being left on?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Yosemite Sam

    Regarding: “But Telford & Wrekin Council insisted the street lights remaining on would not cost taxpayers any money.”; it must be costing monet, if not in terms of Council Tax then in terms of other taxes. But in any case, it is surely not acceptable for whoever is responsible to have lights on when not needed. Won’t someone think of the planet?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Suellan Fowler

    If leaving street lights on doesn’t cost the taxpayer any more does the council get it’s electricity supply for free then? If so I expect a huge back refund on my council tax!

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    tappalch

    I think they may form part of approved highway works associated with the developers of the Lawley Project and have not yet been publicly adopted by the Local Authority

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    hea

    Well done Eric on this story. Yet again the tory council treats us like children – taxpayers are paying the lights – simple as.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    jeff

    so if these light don’t cost the council any money how about the other reason used the other day “carbon emissions” or are they not bothered when it’s not costing?

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Jesus H Corbet

    Of course it doesn’t cost the tax payer or the council money to leave these lights on. They’re SOLAR Powered night lights ;-)

    Remember kiddies the council work for us, they’ve got our best interests at heart, and they’d never ever ever lie to us.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Martin

    If lights being left on doesn’t cost the council anything extra, then as council tax payers can we also have some of this “free” electricity for our homes.

    Another suggestion switch off the traffic lights at Hollinswood Interchange at night

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Galena

    If it is not costing any extra for the lights to be on, someone is already paying for them to be on in the first place. Yes readers, its us!

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Elephant

    The Council does not have to pay extra because it isn’t possible to put an electric meter on each lampost. The energy company charges a fixed rate.

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    Galena

    Elephant,

    If the energy Co. charges a fixed rate, there is no reason to switch lights off as proposed.

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    Rob, Telford

    Galena said:
    “If the energy Co. charges a fixed rate, there is no reason to switch lights off as proposed.”

    They charge a fixed rate based on how long the lights are supposed to be on for….

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    VV

    I can think of a perfect reason to turn the lights off: it wastes energy. Oil, coal and natural gas (et al) are finite resources.

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    Suellan Fowler

    What really matters is that it’s plain chuffin stupid to burn lights all day!

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.