Letter: Hunt is using trunk roads

Tuesday 9th February 2010, 7:23AM GMT.

Letter: The hunt community appears to be taking to the county’s trunk roads in pursuit of its quarry.

I was driving along the A41 south of Tern Hill last Wednesday afternoon, rounded a sharp bend, and was confronted by a large pack of dogs coming towards me in the middle of the road, accompanied by a number of fools on horseback.

I was forced to brake and slow down, and they simply continued past me, exchanging abuse as I berated them forcefully for their outrageous behaviour.

They appeared to be treating this notorious stretch of a busy main road as a viable alternative to making a nuisance of themselves in the countryside proper, and some of their bedraggled “hunt followers” were also parked on the road, thereby ensuring that the danger to other road users was maximised as they flicked “V” signs at me.

I have never been under the illusion that the hunting community had hidden stockpiles of laser intelligence or natural humility, but this latest episode takes stupidity, arrogance and recklessness to award-winning levels.

I phoned Market Drayton police, pointing out that a serious accident could have resulted from this incident, and that a dog owner would probably have been rightly prosecuted if they had allowed their lone pet to wander across a busy trunk road at peak times. After a call back to say that the incident was being investigated, and that they would get back to me, I have heard nothing.

During the ensuing silence, am I allowed to wonder if the hunting sector believes that it might be beyond the reach of laws which other people have to abide by, knowing that its acts of life threatening crassness will be indulged by authority and the establishment?

If so, perhaps we ought to think about banning hunting by statute.

Stewart Perkins

Market Drayton


  1. 1
    spencer

    Writer said ” was confronted by a large pack of dogs coming towards me in the middle of the road accompanied by a number of fools on horseback “……..Don’t you wish you were driving a Toyota..

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    KB

    The hunts do seem to believe themselves above the law and action needs to be taken to stop them letting their dogs wander all over highways, fouling footpaths, and causing drivers to take evasaive action to avoid large numbers of dogs in the road.

    I have the misfortune to drive along part of the route used by the South Shropshire hunt for exercising their dogs, and often meet a pack of hounds spread out across the (fast main) road with nobody having any real control over them. There is supposed to be a Dog Control order in the area meaning dogs should be on leads on public highways but that is flouted by the hunt. Try to get past the dogs so you can get to work and you get abuse – I dread to think what would happen should they meet an emergency vehicle. The dogs are also allowed to wander up people’s drives and foul on their gardens – if I let a dog do that I’d be lynched, let alone fined.

    As for the car followers, they seem to be under the impression that the Highway Code is for everyone else, not them. They block country lanes, drive at high speed down single track lanes with no regard for other road users – including horse riders who aren’t part of the hunt – and shout abuse at anyone who won’t get out of their way. They seem unaware of the use of passing spaces, let alone the need to drive carefully.

    The arrogance of the hunting community has to be seen to be believed – it’s a wonder there aren’t accidents on the roads when the hunt is around, I do wonder how many near misses are covered up or reported to the police but not investigated.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Andrew finch

    Just read this story what a load of old piffle , clearly an anti hunting person.I doubt very much it happened as he says, perhaps stuart could now give us the proper version?????? with out the dramatics.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Dee

    The arrogance of the hunting fraternity never ceases to amaze me. Having been a sab on many hunts over many years, I know the kind of attitude facing normal law abiding citizens. I have said it before and say it again Hunting is a Class thing, if a group of people signing on where to chase foxes for a living it would be deemed outrageous and actually banned, not a pretend ban like we have in place now!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    eva land

    If it wasn’t for misplaced sentimentality and a left over of urbs v rure snobbery this game would have been banned years ago or at least confined and contained in large country estates where people can live in an unreal world.

    I hope that there is some police action taken Stewart, to deal with this anti social behaviour and what amounts to people acting as pretentious thugs.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    KB

    Bearing in mind that they are supposed to be following a trail, if they’re sticking to the law, then it does make you wonder how they think a major route is a suitabe place for laying a trail.

    We can but hope that, if they were indeed chasing a fox (and breaking the law) that there were enough witnesses about to get this investigated and arrests made. Or are the police not interested in people who are breaking this particular law?

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    ron shaw

    they are a law to themselves, it will get worse when the Tories get back in.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    aNDREW FINCH

    Again and again hunting is banned and yet we have people prattling on this site as though it is still happening where is you proof where are the proscutions . It seems to me the antis have lost their sport of hunting the hunter/follower so must maek it up as they go along it is all very boreing and all based on what they think is going to happen not what does happen , remember they are permitted to flush with two hounds to a waiting gun all the hunts in the uk abide by the law of the land as it stands if they do not prosecute produce evidence or shut up.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Peter

    I encountered a similar problem some years ago (prior to the ban) on the ‘Rabbit Run’ between the narrow bridge and the Folly Inn.

    Highly dangerous and irresponsible behaviour by horse riders and dogs alike, and a degree of arrogance on behalf of the red-coated buffoons which had to be seen to be believed.

    If one of the many HGVs that travel that road had happened along there would have been carnage.

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Andrew finch

    oh peter “arrogance on behalf of the red-coated buffoons” sweeping staements again,
    “irresponsible behaviour by dogs” peter gets better and better

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    spencer

    I’ve seen them on the A49 just south of Ludlow before now. And as for 2&7, just because people write things you don’t like it doesn’t make them liars..

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    Pam W

    1st off to all replays so far resorting to name calling does not solve any issues for either side.

    With regards to the issue in hand I agree with Mr Finchley. On all occassions I have followed the North Shropshire Hunt, they are courteous of other road users.
    If you started berating them first, I see no reason for them not giving it back!!

    Were you drinving at the legal speed limit? Did you apporach the bend with due caution in anticipation of what might be on the other side?

    As for Dee’s comments… admitting to being a sab is not to be proud of!! Actions of ‘sabs’ have resulted in injuries of animals and people and not so long ago the death of of a hunt supporter following the actions of a ‘sab’.

    To exclude Hunt followers as not being law abiding citizens is also wrong.
    If they were breaking the law, they would be prosecuted accordingly, same as any law breaker.

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    Former Salopian

    So some people had the audacity to walk their dogs on a road whilst riding horses and you felt this warranted a call to the police to complain! I’m sure between solving double murders and suicides in Oswestry and looking for missing teenagers in Shrewsbury they’ll find time to get back to you. There is a place called the real world, come and join it sometime!

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    Evans

    This letter and many of these comments just reflect the small mindedness that people have in relation to hunting. I can ASSURE you that the perception that people seem to have of the hunt being a ‘bunch of snobs on horseback’ is a complete and utter farce. Many people with horses slog their guts out to afford to keep their horses out of pure love of riding and dedication, including myself!!! These points of view infuriate me beyond belief. People who make such comments have absolutely no understanding of hunting or countrylife. Maybe they should attend a hunt meet and witness what a nice, friendly bunch of people the hunting fraternity are, who are doing everything possible to maintain a good reputation at present, including POLITENESS and COURTESY to other road users in most cases.

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    dee

    ANDREW FINCH
    lets put emotion aside and politics aside. Lets say YOU and loved ones are in a car, driving along and you are confronted by loose hounds (a pack, not one or two) and horses and people on horseback, lets say you have to swerve or break hard, lets say you even crash because of the situation…is that still acceptable in your eyes? Would your attitude be different if it was just “normal” horseriders? No…didnt think so. You need to stop prattling on yourself mate, hunting does still go on the ILLEGAL way, but this is about common sense and road safety.

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    Pam W

    @ Former Salopian

    Full agreement with you!!

    Report abuse

  17. 17
    Harry Gant

    Great letter – made me laugh anyway. The fox knew what he was doing leading the fools in red up the A41! He could created a tragic outcome have if one of those Irish Trucks, exempt from our speeding laws, had been coming the other way.

    Report abuse

  18. 18
    KB

    Hunting, including blocking earths, is certainly still going on but try to get proof of it and you’re likely to get beaten up.

    My longer comment has been modded out, basically saying that the hunts break the law as it suits them.

    It’s nothing to do with urban dwellers v country people, I live in the country and know very few people who are pro hunting.

    Report abuse

  19. 19
    Pam W

    Irish Trucks aren’t exempt from our speeding laws

    Report abuse

  20. 20
    Dee

    PAM – VERY VERY PROUD

    Report abuse

  21. 21
    Dee

    AND as people assume all huntsfolk are snobs most people assume sabs and anti hunters are dole dossers with no life!! I am proud to stand in the way of animal cruelty, make no secret of it and its nothing to be ashamed of !!

    KB you are absolutely spot on, it does still go on, the law works for them.

    Report abuse

  22. 22
    Matt

    ” Exchanging abuse… I berated them forcefully…”

    Oh. Acting in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace, where you? But that doesn’t matter, as you were in the right!

    Report abuse

  23. 23
    Dee

    oh and Pam, dont assume all sabs are killers and murderers, and if your going down that road, Jill Phipps springs to mind and more sabs and anti-protesters have been injured in these situations than anyone so give it rest or get your facts right

    Report abuse

  24. 24
    paul passant

    as a regular lorry driver along the A41 can’t wait to see our irish and foreign mates with their new road kill festooning the front of their trucks.i’ve met these wallies on this road they only think of themselves and not what carnage they could cause. look at the roads record for death and serious injuries we do not need these people to make it worse.

    Report abuse

  25. 25
    eva land

    So do I but I still get sick of people referring to foxes as rural beasts when the majority of them live in urban areas.
    It may surprise you to know that their main source of food is earthworms and despite my losing two hens to either a fox or a Buzzard this Xmas, I still cannot see any reason for old traditions like fox hunting being maintained as a right unless in a more modified acceptable form.
    I would not bring back hanging either.

    Report abuse

  26. 26
    wooders

    Aimed at comment 15.
    If your going so fast that you cannot stop in due course then you must be driving too fast for the conditions.
    What if there was a car broken down around the corner? Your argument is flawed all the way through.

    Report abuse

  27. 27
    Salopian

    If Fox hunting no longer takes place then what has happened to all the foxes that needed to be chased by a pack of savages and ripped apart by dogs? (this was according to the pro hunt lobby who also claimed that thousands of jobs would be lost due to the ban – whatever happened to that claim?)
    If the answer is that foxes are now controlled by other means then why was fox hunting ever neccessary.
    If the answer is that there are now simply fewer foxes then it proves that the hunts bred foxes to kill for their own sick pleasures.
    Or – is the true answer that fox hunting with horses and dogs does still take place?
    Oscar Wilde was spot on!!

    Report abuse

  28. 28
    Andrew finch

    dee i have encountered all what you have said on a road i travel on a regular basis never have had a problem with the hunt or hounds always very polite ssh/nsh/etc etc and i doubt any one is abused insulted etc etc , however you cant expect to shout abuse at people and not expect a mouthfull back.
    I infact remember the boxing day meet at longdon pub, horses etc in the pub carpark so were followers and general public who had turned out and along comes some bloke in his car his wife driving as he sits in the passenger seat shouting foul language giving hand gestures etc etc all while his baby and young child sat in the back looking totaly bewildered what had caused their father to behave like some type of yobbo.
    As for the issue hunting still goes on yes it does (within the law) i will not call you mate dee as i do not know you and you are not my mate however lets see the proof? where is it?? not excuses but proof?? give the proof to the police it is their duty to investigate and they will, no makeing excuses by saying they do not investigate if that is the case how many complaints have been made to the police complaints dept??? how many was that??? as i thought all fabricated rubbish .
    As i have said in the past many thought the end of fox hunting as was would stop any killing of the fox it has not more die now than ever before what you should ie the antis have campaigned for was to get the fox removed from the vermin list .

    Report abuse

  29. 29
    winja

    Reading the letter, I smell a sizeable amount of bovine excrement.

    And, of course, anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all.

    Move on.

    Report abuse

  30. 30
    sean hudspeth

    andrew Finch,
    your comments are totally and utterly ridiculous and indeed moronic
    Also as stated above there are LAWS in this country which seem to be continually flouted by the Hunting fraternity and not properly persued (in my opinion as well as others) by the relevent authorities.As a lifelong countyside resident and former exponent as well as persuant of the countryside vermin control lifestyle (working on land including estate owned by lord litchfield and much or shropshire and its bordering welsh countryside) i can honestly say that the hunt and nearly all its followers are in total disregard for anything that gets in the way of their “FUN”.I am going to assume that you either are part of this “set” or are totally misguided as to their conduct.Having witnessed 1st hand their utter contempt for normal behaviour in public places(the type that would see anyone else in trouble with the law) i can honestly confirm that these are indeed people of profound mental retardation living in a world that is nowadays only found in the likes of Blists hill.
    the law is the law and as such should be adhered to by all, at all times!
    the behaviour of these people is on a level with the “boy racer group”and is therfore unacceptable,by way of, one speeds around on our roads with disregard for speed restictions,Hazardous areas,warnings,other road users etc and one rides a horses and leads packs of dogs(or follows behind in a vehicle) wherever they like in the assumption that everyone else MUST give way to them as they are far far superior!
    For example,if a member of the public was to walk their dog unleashed along a public road and it was to chase a rabbit (or suchlike) across the highway causing an accident (or damage to property) then that person would be prosecuted !
    and if it was to be you on the recieving end then im positive you would be insisting the law was upheld to its full extent !

    Report abuse

  31. 31
    Gary

    Should Andrew Finch have the power of vote? Both his and this particular hunts dull appreciation of danger to others undoubtedly raises questions over their future with support from country folks.

    Report abuse

  32. 32
    Craig

    So much of what has been written here is very ill informed and I think it is a real shame that this country has gone so far in losing touch with its rural roots. Complaints about hounds using roads to exercise and/or during hunting are a reflection of exactly this problem. It is as if people believe that roads, especially main roads, are sacrosanct for motor vehicles and that animals should have no place on them whatsoever. Well, the countryside is far older than the most ancient of cars, and hunting similarly so. Hounds have run over that land for generations, long before articulated lorries were even dreamt of.

    Of course, this does not mean that it is a good idea for hunts to run across or around main roads. It is dangerous, and believe me, no one worries more about it than those who follow hounds. We all do our best to avoid these situations, but the real problem is not the intrusion of hunting on our transport infrastructure, but the ever budgeoning dominance of that infrastructure over everything else. The countryside is not what it once was, it is overrun with traffic. Just please try and understand that the vast majority of hunting people (excepting a few idiots) are responsible, and are doing their best to continue an ancient and deeply rural way of life in a busy, hi – speed focused world. We do not aim to cause accidents or upset people, but the ever growing dominance of vehicles in our countryside makes things very difficult.

    I witnessed the event in question, and the man who wrote the letter drove quickly past horses and hounds and beeped his horn aggressively. The hounds WERE under control and were being removed from the road ASAP. By acting in such an arrogant way this person was actually the only one in danger of causing an accident, by spooking the horses. Far from the concern for safety which he suggests in his letter, I argue he showed mere intolerance and contempt, and I hope he feels ashamed.

    Report abuse

  33. 33
    Ed

    I nearly drove into horses, hunters and dogs as I came round a blind bend. Thankfully I stopped in time, but some of the riders felt the need to scream abuse at me…what for? Using the road? I wasn’t speeding and they shouldn’t have been there. It’s also very rude how their followers park along the little lanes, cutting up the grass, blocking the way for other road users. Very odd behaviour.

    Report abuse

  34. 34
    Peter

    Andrew,

    Just how far in denial are you? I saw the incident I decribed with my own eyes.

    There were horses and dogs all across the road, on a near blind bend, on a national speed limit road.

    Those supposedly in charge had lost all control of their animals, and for a few moments there was chaos. If a fast moving vehicle had approached – especially a large vehicle, there would have been a serious accident. I would suggest it was hardly worth the risk on order to chase a defenceless animal about the countryside, and was downright irresponsible behaviour.

    Report abuse

  35. 35
    rpt Barrington-Black

    Would Andrew Finch like to tell us what business he operates?

    I am amazed that he has so much time to comment on everything, at all times of the working day.

    What do you do?

    Report abuse

  36. 36
    Andrew finch

    Selfemployed business have ran own business for 3 years prior to that 17 years with the same employ er not on benefits business doing ok and pop in to the ss site through the day on the old lap top. And was a labour voter now float between tory/ukip hope that helps

    Report abuse

  37. 37
    eva land

    Craig, I’m sorry but you are talking piffle.
    [real shame that this country has gone so far in losing touch with its rural roots]
    People has always survived by living in groups. Groups become villages, towns and cities and those places have thrived on the eventual industrial revolution.
    Through money/religion certain groups could have the best of both worlds. Live off the money made in the cities but experience the quality of life in the countryside.
    What does deeply rural mean exactly? Is it those who live without cars, internet, telecommunications, grow and kill their own food. How many so called country folk are there that live that way today?

    There is no rural/town divide. Some people choose to live with the inconveniences of more isolated dwellings and some don’t.

    Foxes BTW kill a huge number of rats,and as 60% of them develop the mange do not need a lot of unfeeling human beings to reduce themselves to savage behaviour to control their population.

    Report abuse

  38. 38
    Craig Bryant

    Eva,

    I didn’t say anything about the industrial revolution or anything like that, but it is certainly the case that the country has gone from being predominantly rural to predominantly urban. That is why I spoke about ‘roots’. That has nothing to do with whether people ‘survive by living in groups’ or not. ‘Groups’ exist in the country as well as towns – you mention villages. Hunting brings people together in all sorts of ways as well, and encourages mutual co operation and interdependency, so I would argue in a way you are making my point for me.

    Fine if you work in cities and live in the country, but if most of your life is focused on urban activities (i.e. your weekend takes the form of shopping, football, whatever), you probably do not have a great grasp of the subtleties of country life.

    As for: ‘Is it those who live without cars, internet, telecomomunications….etc’, of course I am not talking about that, now you are being facetious. Very few live without those and I wouldn’t argue they should do. But in keeping horses and hounds – and yes, growing and killing their own food in many cases, they are continuing to live in a manner that harks way back to even pre – industrial eras. It isn’t anachronistic either, its just an appreciation of the true finer things in life, the essence of what makes us human.

    Report abuse

  39. 39
    Pam W

    Round of Applause for comments 32 and 38 from Craig!

    Comment 23 from Dee – No assumption was made that “sabs are killers and murderers”. I merely stated that actions of some have resulted in the death of hunt supporter…Trevor Morse. (If your going to start bringing names to mind) killed by a low flying gyrocopter ‘monitoring’ the hunt.

    Jill Phipps was one of ten protesters (protesting live export) that broke through police lines and were trying to bring a lorry to a halt by sitting in the road or chaining themselves to it when Phipps was crushed beneath the lorry’s wheels.
    How does she relate to what I said??

    Report abuse

  40. 40
    Harry Gant

    Regards Point 19 – in a dry way I was implying that Irish Truckers and Fools in Red have something in common regarding their attitude to the law! Look if you guys want to indulge your ancient blood lust please do it away from busy roads, golf courses where I once witnessed the Hunt riding roughshod over manicured greens and away from pet dogs and cats – a neighbour had hounds pursue his small pet dog into his house and up the stairs! The hunt were on the way to the Meet at a local hostelry. I really don’t believe these hounds are capable of tight control once they are on the scent of a kill. The A41 is dangerous enough without any extra hazards!

    Report abuse

  41. 41
    spencer

    Typical pro hunt argument this is turning out to be. Whats all this Town v Country rubbish all about.
    This is a letter about a man from Market Drayton ( a rural town in a rural county )having a near accident with the North Shropshire hunt and a brief confrontation taking place (which is a regular occurance when near misses happen ). We don’t burn witches anymore, same as we shouldn’t hunt Foxes anymore, the law is quite clear on both counts so please stop patronising us ” urbs ” and carry out your traditional re-enactments safely and responsibly so as not to endanger yourselves or anyone else..

    Report abuse

  42. 42
    dee

    HARRY GRANT – hit the nail on the head “The A41 is dangerous enough without any extra hazards!” exactly, whether hunt related animals on that road or otherwise, a hazard we could all do without. I grew up in Hinstock and the section of road from Newport to Hinstock we used to call Death road as thats all that happened on that road, accidents and loss of life.

    PAM….dear, Jill Phipps was a protester and relates to the conversation we had? plain as day to me!

    Fox hunting may be traditional but as Spencer said so was witch hunting, and slavery! Ripping an animal to pieces (any animal) ANY form of animal cruelty for sport or entertainment to me is just BACKWARD

    Report abuse

  43. 43
    mhayworth

    The hunts forget that there is now hours of footage out on uTube showing how foul and violent they really are. I’m not talking about the average hunt rider. It is those in charge who seem to enjoy frightening and bullying mostly retired women who are monitoring (not sabbing) the hunts. They claim the footage is edited but lets face it, if that were true, they would have the full footage out there of at least some of these incidents after all these years. It is little wonder they have absolutely no regard for animals or other people’s land. Every ex-hunter we have spoken to has confirmed this and much much worse. Now David Cameron want’s to legalise this. Don’t let him do it!

    M.Hayworth
    Campaign For Decency

    Report abuse

  44. 44
    Geoffrey Woollard

    “If so, perhaps we ought to think about banning hunting by statute.”

    Fox hunting with hounds (along with hare coursing) has been banned by statute, but these perverted people are claiming on the one hand that it shouldn’t be banned by statute and/or that the statute is ‘unworkable’ and/or that they are suffering ‘hardship’ from the workings of the statute. Well, let’s ensure that the statute is made more workable by strengthening it, not repealing it.

    We British led the way in banning the slave trade and in banning slavery in the Empire, we led the way in banning bear baiting and cock fighting, and we led the way in banning hunting and hare coursing. We must continue to make progress and not let our civilisation take a backward step.

    Report abuse

  45. 45
    eva land

    Craig, just pretending to live in a different world from some rose tinted past with a few more trees doesn’t separate you from being a citizen in the 21 st century enjoying all the benefits as well as restrictions that entails.
    QUOTE
    [ its just an appreciation of the true finer things in life, the essence of what makes us human. ]

    Chasing a creature such as a little fox on horseback so you can see it ripped to pieces by some dogs for sport makes you feel more human!
    Relgious fundamentalism brings people together too but it isn’t necessarily a good reason.

    Report abuse

  46. 46
    salopian

    The hunting issue is a class division just ask Tarquine and Lucinda:-)
    Dog fighting and the breeding of dangerous dogs is illigal and so it should be – it is a vile practice carried out by ignorant savages
    Fox Hunters see themselves as different (right school don’t ya know) and that fox hunting is acceptable (though I contend that the participants are also vile savages) – Why? its a class issue – dog fighting is associated with council estates and fox hunting with country estates. Both activities involve cruel and sensless killing of animals – go figure !

    Report abuse

  47. 47
    mhayworth

    Well said Eva!

    There is no case for repeal. Hunt numbers are up all over the country. Drag hunting is legal. The sense of community, pageantry, heritage, and jobs are all still intact and yet these disgraceful people can’t manage to enjoy themselves unless they are terrifying and killing animals. David Cameron if left unchecked, will go down in history as the first leader in the modern world to actually reverse a law against cruelty.

    Report abuse

  48. 48
    Lord Crocker

    The A41 isn’t a trunk road

    Report abuse

  49. 49
    Craig

    I don’t pretend to live in a different world. Again you miss my point. What I am saying is that certain older ways of life struggle to exist alongside some of those stemming from recent ‘progress’, i.e. I am only TOO aware that we dont live in separate worlds.

    Your comments make it clear that you simply cannot comprehend how anyone can enjoy hunting. Fair enough, but you also betray total intolerance. Along the lines of so many anti hunting arguments, you are essentially telling me that ‘being a citizen of the 21st century’ should not include hunting, for a variety of reasons. I dispute that. If we followed your argument through could we not end up suggesting that anything which appears even a little anachronistic is no longer necessary? But then who decides necessity?

    Yes, of course I enjoy the ‘benefits as well as restrictions’ – I have already acknowledged that. Chasing a ‘little fox’ to see it ‘ripped to pieces’ is not what motivates me, but part of what does is the knowledge that in hunting we have a link right back to our earliest human ancestors. If that seems a bit far fetched, consider this: There are large parts of this county which I know so well that I can virtually tell you where ever gate is and in many cases who owns the land. I don’t expect you to understand this, but without hunting I doubt I or many others would ever appreciate the true complexity of the countryside. Yes there are other ways of learning about it, but in reality there are very few ways of appreciating a country which rival being involved in a local pack of hounds. Of course, you can just blitz past it all in a car or a train and think it looks pretty if you like.

    Report abuse

  50. 50
    spencer

    @ Craig, If you know this county so well then get your horses off the A41 before someone gets killed………..there, problem sorted.

    Report abuse

  51. 51
    eva land

    Craig stop making guesses/judgements about your knowledge of the countryside compared to others who post on here.
    If you return to my first post you will see that I did comment that the sport in a modified form not involving cruelty can be confined to private property.
    You fail to understand that there are many ways of appreciating our countryside and towns that you appear to have yet to discover.

    Why don’t you try Cumberland wrestling?
    At least that is a man to man sport even if it does entail wearing flowery pants over tights. It’s all tradition and as Kenny Everett would say “In the best possible taste!”

    It is also not carried out on a public highway so tradition and life in the 21st century can co-exist when practical and moral.

    Report abuse

  52. 52
    Ron

    I wonder what the reaction would have been had the guy actually hit and ran over several of the hounds, no doubts the pro hunt lobby would claim it as an act of sabotage.

    Report abuse

  53. 53
    Gary

    Perhaps Craig would also like to bring back some of the ‘old country ways’ – perhaps slavery or bear pits etc. His continued support of killing defenceless animals, badger baiting and hare coursing is an insult to those of us that live in the country. Perhaps he would also defend his hounds and horses galloping over an airfield? He must remember that foxes were around long before morons on horseback exsisted to chase, torment and kill them for their own evil pleasure.

    Report abuse

  54. 54
    Jane

    I know the countryside very well Craig, I come from a farming background, but I don’t agree with fox hunting. It’s a very cruel way to control the fox population and from a farmers point of view it causes damage and frightens livestock.

    Report abuse

  55. 55
    winja

    As an impartial observer of this “thread”, I would say that Chris is one of the more cogent and intelligent contributors to it.

    Well, at least his comments are well scripted and avoid useless, and needless, ad hominem. As a forum moderator (which I am, incidentally), I’d welcome his input and consider the deletion of many other posts / comments that oppose his viewpoint, purely due to the content attacking the commenter rather than the message posted therein.

    Report abuse

  56. 56
    eva land

    So we’ve moved on from who stands for tradition and knowledge of the countryside and the morality of killing an animal for sport to who is an expert on discussion manipulation.

    I am surprised at your contribution because compared to speeding on the roads, the BNP and dog mess, subjects which elicit huge responses,this debate has been thoughtful and constructive.
    Your comment is so vague and disingenuous it probably wasn’t worth commenting on really.

    Report abuse

  57. 57
    dee

    Winja, its a thread debate and as a moderater (or so you say) you should know full well, these types of conversations end up emotive, critical and derogatory – depending on how you perceive situations, statements, comments etc. So, while you back Craig, thats fine, dont tell others what they can and can’t say or insult people’s intelligence along the way

    Report abuse

  58. 58
    spencer

    @ 55, As an impartial observer you could have at least noticed that nobody called Chris has actually contributed to this thread, But i hope that elevating yourself to the pretence of a higher level of intelligence made you feel good about yourself for a little while.

    Report abuse

  59. 59
    spencer

    Don’t worry Andrew, your job as moderator is quite safe..

    Report abuse

  60. 60
    Craig

    “You fail to understand that there are many ways of appreciating our countryside…”. I don’t, and acknowledged that in my previous post. All I was saying is that hunting gives you a pretty unique perspective, and in my opinion, a very deep appreciation of the countryside, owing to its multifaceted nature. I am also a keen walker, and as a Masters student I will hopefully one day be writing a PhD which will probably be based in Landscape History. I love orienteering type things and have a large collection of OS maps which get very well used. I am certainly not ignorant of other ways of enjoying the country.

    “..from a farmers point of view it causes damage and frightens livestock”. Yes, I take your point that not all farmers support hunting. But then again, many do, and in this part of the world I would say a clear majority. Many farmers love to see the hounds as they are a welcome break from the daily rigour of life, and not many farmers I know perceive it as cruel.

    “So we’ve moved on from who stands for tradition and knowledge of the countryside….to who is an expert on discussion manipulation.”
    It isn’t ‘discussion manipulation’, it is a reaction to you twisting MY words, or at the very least interpreting them facetiously. As Wijma said, many people do just attack the poster and not the post, which I don’t think is very fair.

    And how can anyone say because I support foxhunting I also support bear baiting, badger baiting and dog fighting? There is a world of difference between them and if you can’t see that I feel sorry for you. Those other ‘sports’ involve deliberately stopping any chance of escape and then forcing the animal to fight to the death. It is a form of torture. Pitting your wits against a wild animal running free which if caught (and many are not), will be killed very quickly is a world apart.

    Report abuse

  61. 61
    Craig

    I’d just like to say in fairness that when I said about people attacking the person posting not the post itself I was not meaning Eva. She has consistently responded to what I have actually written, so I would not want her to think I was having a dig at her there.

    Report abuse

  62. 62
    eva land

    [farmers love to see the hounds as they are a welcome break from the daily rigour of life, ]

    The pastoral scene you are describing sounds idyllic Craig, are you sure it isn’t Eng Lit you are studying.

    Report abuse

  63. 63
    spencer

    Ah yes, the sounds of the countryside..The church bells ringing on a sunday morning. The thwack of leather on willow resounding from the cricket green, the hum of the vicars wife delivering cakes around the parish in a morris 1000. And the terrified screeching of a fox as it gets ripped apart by a pack of blood thirsty dogs in the name of sport..A welcome break indeed..

    Report abuse

  64. 64
    Craig

    Actually by ‘daily rigour’ of life I think I was implying the opposite – that in fact life in the country is very often hard, not idyllic. It is a fact that lots of farmers and farmworkers love hunting.

    Report abuse

  65. 65
    Rob, Telford

    spencer said: Feb 12th, 2010 at 14:19

    “Ah yes, the sounds of the countryside….A welcome break indeed.”

    But Spencer, you forgot the friendly welcome from the locals – “you’re not from round ‘ere are you?” and the thrilling spectacle of hounds being dispatched behind the hunt kennels once they’re too old to keep up with the pack….

    Report abuse

  66. 66
    dee

    Craig said: Feb 12th, 2010 at 15:38 Actually by ‘daily rigour’ of life I think I was implying the opposite – that in fact life in the country is very often hard, not idyllic. It is a fact that lots of farmers and farmworkers love hunting”

    You are now officially chatting 54iT! Life HARD for alot of people, they dont feel the need to go hunting to feel better! Craig you are an idiot. Period

    Report abuse

  67. 67
    Andrew finch

    Spencer ever thought of this, what is the difference to being shot with a shotgun? farmer giles taking pot shots at the fox (more are shot by this weapon than a rifle) and dispatched by hounds, the fox is long dead when it is so called ripped apart it is dead in seconds .
    The facts are why do not people just admit they do not want the fox killed at all and why do they not lobby their mp to get it protected?.
    I think many people now are tired of the argument from both sides and do not care one jot what happens to the fox ,anti,hunter, labour did not get in because they promised to ban fox hunting most voters hadnt given it much thought at all but most now have heard the jingo from the pros the fox is a mass murderer, to the antis 15 hounds pounced on the fox and five minutes later the fox emerged and tried to get away all clap trap.
    Hunting and the people who participate are acting within the law the antis know it but it is a case no win for either side as both both are seen by the general public as bad as each other. And it has become sport to watch them both.

    Report abuse

  68. 68
    eva land

    This whole debate was initiated by someone complaining about the dangerous situation they encountered when driving on the public highway.
    Various people have shown by their views that they have no problem with this sport in its now more acceptable form so long as it is not endangering the life of other road users.

    I think you can be assured that most people do not spend time fantasing about the demise of foxes or other wildlife who as a general rule die in unpleasant circumstances of starvation, cold or with foxes a lingering death with the mange.
    Those who orchestrate the chase and cannot enjoy it sufficiently without the ripping apart of the fox for pleasure are to most of us not civilised citizens of the 21 st century and that is why the law has been changed in agreement with the majority.

    Report abuse

  69. 69
    Craig

    Quote from Dee: “Craig you are an idiot. Period’.

    Coming after your previous sentence, which once again spectacularly misses the point, this is quite rich. What a bogus argument you make and then you call me an idiot. I won’t even try pointing out why it is bogus, I hope people can see for themselves.

    Report abuse

  70. 70
    Gary

    Craig & Andrew F – regardless of alledged education and your self perceived social standing; your immorale support of a backward, repellent and ILLEGAL act of ‘countryside terrorism’ highlights you for what you truly are.

    Report abuse

  71. 71
    carol

    We must all remember to carry cameras for photographic evidence. We can then produce it to andrew finch as he is constantly asking for PROOF. lol You are so untrustworthy it is very sad.

    Report abuse

  72. 72
    andrew finch

    Please carol give us your full name so we can ensure you never serve on a jury or are never asked to provide the police with anything regards a crime as you have little understanding of the British legal system . Very sad we have such gullible people out in the general public.

    Report abuse

  73. 73
    carol

    How you can read that through my previous comment i have no understanding of the British legal system is entertaing to say the least. I mearly stated that the general public are within their rights to comment on this site without having to provide YOU with PROOF. Your comments are alittle tedious.

    Report abuse

  74. 74
    dee

    Changing the subject slightly, talking about proof etc…Andrew if anyone can bring yourself to watch an absolutely amazing film/docu called The Cove, which is about Japans dirty little secret of killing dolphins, I would like to know if you think the team who exposed that filth had gathered enough proof and evidence of the slaughter going on in that Cove….??? Proved beyond belief what was going on there and still it goes on…sound similar?

    Report abuse

  75. 75
    dee

    sorry for the grammer on last post, got carried away!

    Report abuse

  76. 76
    carol

    Reading through your own comments a. finch would im sure be highly entertaining. When not harping on about your own self opinionated position in this world you are contradicting yourself over and over. Comment n0 3 you sound pro hunting and doubtful of what stuart actually saw. He must if you say so of been dreaming. comment n015 sounds like you beleive it happened???? comment n028 are you in doubt again???

    Report abuse

  77. 77
    Andrew p.

    What in carols comment makes her interpreted as gullable?? Andrew f. you make it up as you go along matey.

    Report abuse

  78. 78
    Andrew finch

    Carol old girl , my complaint is you or anyone should not make silly sweeping statements such as hunting still goes on in the banned way without showing and giving the eveidence to the police, and permiting the police and the cps to investigate and prosecute if you have genuine complaints. If however you with hold evidence of a crime are you not commiting one?????.
    As for dee two differnt subjects .
    I would also add if people have this so called evidence give it to me and I will take it to the police and demand they investigate which is the right of any uk citizen if they susspect a crime has taken place.
    I do agree the hunt were probably walking along the road and?? they are entiteld to do so how are the supposed to get from one farm to the other fly?.

    Report abuse

  79. 79
    Spike

    This the funniest post i have read in ages. Finch your stirring the antis up dtop it , antis you seem to miss the point finch is making if you have all this proof as he calls it why havent you took it to plod??.My own opinion is the antis seem to be full of people who belong to the nudge nudge wink wink club who also think jfk,diana,twin towers , were all done by the rich, and more than likely finch and the others on here with his view are taking the mick out of you . Never the less a good laugh all of you keep it up.

    Report abuse

  80. 80
    eva land

    If you bothered reading the letter written by Stewart in the first place Spike you will see that that is exactly what he has done.
    I don’t think Stewart is an “anti” he just does not like some folk thinking they are above the law and endangering people’s lives.

    Andrew Finch is just a poster with nothing really to say so it appears as he continually contradicts himself and did not read the original letter either.

    Report abuse

  81. 81
    dee

    Andrew, what an arrogant, uneducated statement you just made…”give it to me and I will take it to the police and demand they investigate which is the right of any uk citizen if they susspect a crime has taken place” LMAO!!! Oh I never thought of that!! WHY OH WHY DO YOU THINK PEOPLE GIVE UP ON THE POLICE!!??? The amount of times I have given my evidence to the police, they really are not interested, or are too busy. But hey, if you can make that difference Andrew, feel free, you go and DEMAND!

    Report abuse

  82. 82
    Andrew finch

    Sorry Dee i do not believe you it seems everyone is dishonest or not doing their jobs properly.
    You are actually saying that the police have failed to act on all the evidence you have ?. So you are saying they are not performing their duty, or your evidence amounts to nothing??.
    If it is infact the first why have you not taken it further? I am sure the press would be very interested if you have been providing solid good evidence to your local police force and they ignore it . May i suggest you contact one of the many mp’s who voted for the ban who I am sure will take up your concerns.

    Report abuse

  83. 83
    Lynn Cordell

    Well said Stewart Perkins!

    Agree with everything you say!

    Report abuse

  84. 84
    lou

    good on you andrew finch, i was out hunting on that day, there were two cars parked off the road, the hounds were huddled in a gateway as the car came around the bend, must have been an anti hunt person, when are they going to learn to mind there own business or even bother to find out what actually happens on a hunt, untill then they should keep their opinions to them selves oh and by the way i have a phd so we are not all lacking in intelligence

    Report abuse

  85. 85
    eva land

    This last letter says it all.
    Rude,defensive and completely missing the point.
    The consensus of opinion here is that the law is made to be adhered to for each and everyone of us, motorists, pedestrians, cyclists, horse riders and even those with phds.

    Stewart made a complaint about an incident on the public highway which appears not to be a one off situation judging by other comments.

    A lot of people have posted views which to some of us who had little interest in the subject up to now has clarified why people get so emotive about fox hunting other than it being an unpleasant bloodsport.

    It has revealed a hidden agenda which seems to centre around a special case being made for a certain group of people.

    Report abuse

  86. 86
    Andrew finch

    So the break down of all this is,
    We all belive the incident tokk place because one chap said it did,
    The police are on the side of the hunters,
    The hunters are above the law,
    hunting in the old format still goe on but nobody can prove it,
    If they do prove it (the antis) the police ignore it ,
    YES okay of course they do

    Report abuse

  87. 87
    eva land

    Please try to read posts before commenting Andrew, then you might have something of interest to say.

    Report abuse

  88. 88
    Keith

    Some commentators seem to think that it is their right to drive at the legal limit approaching a blind bend and it is somone elses fault if around the bend the road is blocked. In this case it may have been a pack of hunting dogs and horse riders, it could have been a group of children or a stationary truck. The highway code requires you to drive at a speed that allows you to safely stop within the distance you can see.
    As a walker, car driver and motorcyclist of over forty accident free years experience you learn over the years how dangerous some arrogant car drivers are believing they have a right for the road ahead to be clear for them.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.