The MMR jab: One mother’s experience

Friday 29th January 2010, 9:00AM GMT.

Tracey and son Beau in a picture taken three weeks after his birth

Tracey and son Beau in a picture taken three weeks after his birth

I have been dreading this appointment since my son Beau was born. I knew it would come and I knew I would have no choice but to face it.

Today Beau, at just over 14 months, is scheduled to have his MMR jab.

And despite all my better judgement I am quietly terrified about it.

Because that’s the terrible legacy of Dr Andrew Wakefield.

Today, after being found guilty of a series of misconduct charges related to unethical research which linked the MMR jab with autism, his fall from grace is complete.

The case by the General Medical Council is believed to have cost in excess of £1 million so far and has taken over two and half years to reach this point.

But Wakefield’s original study, published more than 12 years ago, has done far more damage than just costing time or money.

I am so torn about today, and I have no doubt there are many parents who feel the same when their time comes. A large part of me is so glad this date has arrived and my child will be protected against diseases that could potentially kill him.

But, amid the fears re-ignited by today’s developments in London — there is another small part of me that wishes it was not yet time

Now, in my heart of hearts I know this is the best thing for Beau and that all the evidence points to no link between the MMR and autism.

In fact only last week another study from Poland revealed that vaccinated children have a lower risk of autism. Not just the same risk but a lower risk.

But the nationwide scare that Andrew Wakefield caused is still making news and causing those niggling doubts to re-surface.

His 1998 Lancet paper linking the vaccine with bowel disease and autism is said to have done more damage than anything published in a scientific journal in living memory. Vaccination rates against MMR plunged following publication of the research and have never fully recovered.

It makes days like today even more tortuous than they would have been. It makes the decision we have made to go through with it all the harder.

He has caused parents to doubt the very people they always want to, and should, trust.

Even now, more than a decade later, parents are still divided on the topic.

I have spoken to mums who only feel comfortable with it because they have daughters and have been told it is a bigger risk for boys. Urban myth maybe, but it is something people want to grab on to because every parent’s sole aim in life is to keep their children from any harm – even the minutest risk.

Of course they want to get this decision right. We believe it is right to vaccinate Beau but I know I won’t rest easy about it until many months after it has been done. As a mum that is my job – to worry, to question, to protect him.

It will take many more years of studies refuting Wakefield’s research to completely restore confidence among parents but it is important to do so.

This vaccination is important. That’s why parents need support and awareness.

The legacy left by this case has made this is a difficult step, but with support it is one I am sure most will want to take.

And today will go some way to putting things right.

By Tracey O’Sullivan


  1. 1
    LouiseB

    I have to admit I had some lingering fears when my daughters were called for the MMR a couple of years ago.

    In the end I decided to favour the position of the World Health Organisation rather that of Wakefield, who stood to make a fortune from discrediting MMR as he had applied for a patent for a rival drug in the 1990s.

    Let’s now hope uptake of the MMR increases to prevent measles rearing its ugly head again. (Measles deaths have dramatically increased in this country as a result of the media hype of Wakefield’s misguided claims)

    Secondly, hopefully focus can now be re-shifted on finding the real cause of austism. The parents of those affected now deserve from proper answers.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Richard

    Its easier said than done but you have to let your head rule you heart. Dr Wakefield has done terrible damage and is probably the main reason why rates of measles have increased with their associate dangers of death & blindness.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    really ...

    whether Dr Wakefield was wrong or not is not actually why he was villified. It has to be the case in a free society that IF Dr’s/’experts’ express opinions contrary to the governments or public position, they are free to do so. Show the evidence, discuss it and dismiss it. What made this situation worse was the governments position of making it illegal for Dr’s to administer the vaccines separately. For some children that is the best way. Most parents I spoke with who didn’t want their children to have the MMR didn’t want the triple and that was before the links with Autism. As a parent of a 12 year old, I now have the problem with the HPV vaccination – you’re made to feel negligent when you ask questions and that’s before you’ve even made a decision. Telling 12 year olds’ that they ‘won’t get cervical cancer if they have the HPV vaccination’ is as foolish as everyone being told that the MMR is totally safe. Nothing is ever 100% anything.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Gareth

    I don’t understand why someone would agonise. My daughter had hers yesterday. Didn’t give it a second thought. Dr Wakefield is not much more to blame than some of the idiotic parents who have prevented their children from having a potentially life saving jab. Shame on them.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Paul

    MMR is not safe and the General Medical Council is not objective. What I find most telling is the ‘callous disregard’ experienced by the children who became ill following their injection from some of those in the medical profession to whom they turned for help.
    Dr Wakefield and the his co-defendants did not turn their backs and so now need to pay the price for not adhering to a consensus which is in the interest of drug companies and those whom they pay but not in the interest of our children.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Bemused

    Paul said
    “MMR is not safe and the General Medical Council is not objective”

    And your evidence for this is what?? Perhaps you could give a few references to back this up?? I would respectfully suggest that you take the time to read the full range of evidence that has been provided by researchers internationally before making statements like that.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Geek

    “really…” is way off track. The scientific community normally looks after its own, so the discrediting of Wakefield has to be seen as a very serious concern. He was guilty of bad science and some very dodgy practices. He had a vested interest and ignored previous research. The fact that some elements in the media then picked this up and whipped up the hysteria means that the health of thousands of children has been put at risk.

    The individual vaccines were not made illegal. The NHS is publicly funded and has to operate on best value principles. If parents want an alternative, they can pay to have it.

    No medical or surgical procedure is risk free, but then neither is life.

    Regarding the HPV vaccine, then I would say go for it: again there is no reason to suggest that it is unsafe.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Lynda

    Actually, parents CAN’T pay for the separate jabs any more. Pharmaceutical companies have ceased production.

    If governments are so desperate to have people immunise their children – and it’s obviously in the greater good for that to happen – then they should allay the fears of parents and make the vaccine available separately if people want it.

    It’s all very well to say “I didn’t give it a second thought”. I assume you don’t have a child with autism. We do. We also believe in immunisation but, given no one has yet pinpointed the cause of this debilitating disorder, parents have every right to feel squeamish about the MMR

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.