Letter: Labour in denial over cash crisis

Thursday 24th December 2009, 5:50AM GMT.

debt1.jpgLetter: The Labour Government’s pre-Budget report is a statement which is to let the country know what they intend to do to correct the financial crisis they allowed to happen.

It gives the impression they are still in denial.

An example would be of the main bread-winner losing their job, coming home and announcing it to the family and saying “do not worry, carry on spending. I know we have no money, but someone will pay it back in the future”.

It does not matter what you do to earn a living, the principle is the same. I was born and bred on a farm. Like any other business, all day-to-day running of the farm was done to meet future demands.

Any Government that fails in its duty to balance the books is failing the country, by being in denial you only add to the problem.

You could look at the taxation of the country like a farmer reaping his harvest to feed his animals through the winter having 20 per-cent less than he needs he is left with three choices: sell some stock, buy more food in or ration the food to last the winter.

Not with this Government; they print more money! They are making grand statements about being fair and spreading the burden, I fail to see any evidence of this. It must be the only Government to have robbed senior citizens of so much of their income.

The Chancellor proposes a “bonus tax” that is not worth the paper it is written on.

Gordon Brown created a false housing market and now he is trying to create another one with 0.5 per cent interest rates. We are being brain-washed into thinking a rise in housing prices is a good thing. Since when has inflation been good for the country?

I have always been against high interest rates but the balance now is the wrong way.

Peter W Breeze
Wellington


  1. 1
    Jeepers

    Thanks for the Party Political Broadcast on behalf of the Conservative Party.

    I’m sure this crisis would have happened no matter WHO was in power. As politicians of every political hue have – in the last few months – shown that their main loyalty is to themselves rather than the electorate, I don’t think this trend will change next year, whoever is in power.

    without doubt this government has shown itself to be out of touch with the people repeatedly. Its arrogance has known few bounds, and its continued carefree attitude to our money has been seen on numerous occasions.

    I’m still absolutely convinced that the Tories will be no different unfortunately – and in many ways, probably worse.

    Talk about choosing between the lesser of two thieves!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Stuart

    If you can remember Jeepers, or perhaps you can’t as your memory seems a bit iffy. In the run up to the 1997 election, Labour accused the Tories of a £5 billion “black hole” and said that they would have to tax or cut spending in order to fill it. They made a huge issue of it and basically it was this that lost the Tories the election – plus the John Major debacle.
    What Labour did not tell the electorate was the fact that £5 Billion was peanuts to them, they were going to create a £185 Billion black hole and this is what we have today. Labour created this, nobody else and it was Labour that took the Bank regulatory function from the bank of England and then gave it to the new Labour invention the Financial Services Authority who totally failed to regu;ate the banks and let them run riot.
    Labour have left an economic disaster every time their Government ends and yet, in 1997 they took over the best economy that this country has had for donkey’s years.
    No, the consequences for next year (and the many after that) will be the same no matter what party gets in, Labour have caused a problem that will take us 30 years to get out of. They also continue to borrow money right up to the day of the election. If they get in, after the election, watch out because they will be repaying everything that they have borrowed.
    Don’t accuse the Tories of this disaster albeit, if they get in it will be them who pick up the blame for having to correct it.
    If there was any justice, the Tories would lose, Labour should win and the country would then see the utter folly of what this gaggle have done to us over the past 13 years because the coming years are not going to be very pleasant. Why should any other party get the blame for what Labour have done and to say that this crisis would have happened whatever party was in power is just plain stupid, no other party would have borrowed and printed money to the extent that Labour has, the old adage was that they failed “to save for a rainy day”. How very true, now we have to pay back the debts that they racked up and we have nothing to pay them back with, except increased taxes and decreased public spending.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Andrew finch

    Well who do you choose????, I would say the one who will look after the majority. As for me I will look after No1.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    D.L.Barnett

    No one has mentioned the pension crisis .Pensions were flourishing pre 1997.Gordon Brown and his cronies have wrecked the pension industry for rich and poor alike .Not to worry though him and his cronies will be o.k. they will never get their come uppance .

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Peter

    D.L. Barnett, you seem to have overlooked the fact that in the ’80s Thatcher duped thousands of people into leaving SERPS and many company pension schemes in favour of dubious money purchase schemes, leading to the pensions mis-selling crisis.

    Subsequently, in the ’90s many companies stopped paying into their schemes as they felt they could afford to because things were going so well – now they wring their hands and close these schemes as they are in deficit due to their neglect – so the pension holders have their pensions stolen by their bosses twice over! The tax on dividends introduced by Brown pales into insignificance comapared to the undermining of these schemes by the companies which were running them.

    As for the letter writer, he seems to have completely overlooked the cause of the current crisis. Once again, it was the greed of the bosses that led to the losses by ordinary working people – and it is the Tory party who are the party of the bosses, be in no doubt of that!

    And the high demand for private housing in this country was greatly fuelled by the deliberate running down of public housing in the ’80s. That sector has never recovered, so the demand continues…

    As for wanting high savings interest rates, but no inflation – sorry – you can’t have one without the other!

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    m

    this letter is clearly written by a tory, so not worht the paper its written on, torys are selfish and uncaring and socially irresponsible wedded to old fashioned laiussez faire economic idealism which is what caused the credit crunch

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Stuart

    Yes, an extremely good point D.L. Barnett. Everyone, (except those poor people affected) seems to have forgotten that budget of Gordon Brown’s, all those years ago when he calmly announced that in future he was going to start taxing pension scheme investment interest, starting with a tax that first year of £5 Billion. It took him about 5 seconds to say it and in one fell swoop, he took away the worked for pensions of thousands of elderly people, he decimated the funds of every private pension scheme in the country forcing them to pay reduced pensions, in the schemes that did not fold that is and firms restricted pensions schemes or altered them so adversely that nowadays, a once healthy, fair, solvent and profitable national pension system has been utterly wrecked.
    Anyone want an example (and there are hundreds like it), British Airways have a £3 BILLION deficit in their pension scheme which is more than the company is worth. Tax relief (which Clown stopped) on pension fund interest would make an immediate impact on this but does Clown try to undo the damage he has done, no way. The man is a charlatan.
    I wonder how many cheated pensioners will vote for Clown and “New” Labour?.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    D.L..Barnett

    No I did not forget Mrs thatchers part in this .She gave many firms a pension holiday but not the workers in order to boost their values at sell of .She has nothing and I repeat nothing to be proud of .However by 1997 most pension funds had a surplus which had built up .These surpluses should have been for “rainy days” but Mr bean saw the surpluses as another way to raise tax so he took 5 billion a year from them .He was told what the effect would be but just like the 10P tax rate and everything else but he did not listen .One would have to say that a person who believes he is Prime Minister by Devine Right will never listen .D.L.Barnett

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    D.L..Barnett

    Ps I should have spelt it Divine silly billy

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Stuart

    Peter, I suggest that you do a little research because your comment at 5 is utterly flawed and I use that word kindly.
    Labour came into power in 1997, before that, pension schemes, in the main were healthy and viable. Indeed I cannot recall one pension scheme going bust or folding with the exception of that one run by that arch Labour fraudster, Maxwell who used his company pension fund to pay for his grand lifestyle until he took a nosedive off his yacht. Tell me of others, please. You will find it extremely difficult.
    Pension schemes started folding en-masse after Clown raided them for tax on the interest that the invested funds earned. Period.
    In the main, schemes failed because the payments made into them by the would be pensioners, were insufficient to pay the expected pensions based on those contributions because of Clown’s tax deductions. Had he not taxed them, most would have continued as previously.
    Almost every word you utter with regard to pensions is wrong. Clown wrecked them with the encouragement of Bliar, nobody else. Try giving your excuse to those pensioners affected by Clown’s action.
    Then we have once again, the old Peter marxist quote and excuse for everything that is associated with the current disaster. The “bosses are to blame”. This foolish hark back to years long since gone is for the birds. Can I suggest that as opposed to coming out with the quotes of the Andy Cap’s and Fag Ash Lil’s of the Labour Party faithful, you really get with it and face facts, read papers, watch TV news programmes, listen to political speeches, go to libraries and generally do all the things that intelligent people do to keep abreast of developments in this country of ours because you are badly out of touch and one can only conclude that the comments that you make with regard to extreme left wing politics are deliberately so.

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    D.L.Barnett

    I did not forget anything Peter perhaps you should find out what state the pension industry was in when labour came to power in 1997 ? there should be a comment before this it appears not to have been listed

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    D.L.Barnett

    I have a pretty good idea who you are Peter .I am afraid to say that you have been so indoctrinated with Labour all your life you are incapable of seeing any other point of view .If you were sliced into little rings we would see vote Labour at any cost right through you like a stick of rock .There are none so blind as those that will not see .Stuart you are spot on as usual .

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    Stuart

    Just as a little aside to convince the unconvincible that Labour are not the saviours of our national pension schemes, the following are facts which can be verified from any of the financial pages of the leading papers.

    a. Since Brown brought in the tax on pension fund investment interest, a sum ranging from a minimum of £60 BILLION to £85 BILLION has been taken by the Treasury in tax.

    b. Pension funds are now in deficit to the extent of a £300 BILLION. Prior to 1997, they were either in balance or in surplus.

    c. The Labour Party have now started to raid their own pension fund to cover running costs of the party. By imposing this tax on pension fund interest they also are finding their own pension fund in trouble.

    d. The pension fund of members of Parliament is now itself in serious deficit. Much to the extreme anger of Trade Unionists, this Labour Government did not require members to increase their already miserly contributions, they required the Treasury to increase their contribution by £7 MILLION a year.

    Whilst therefore, many hundreds of thousands have seen their pensions either stopped altogether or decreased in value, our own Members of Parliament, on the say – so of the Government have protected their own inflated pensions at the taxpayers expense. Then people have the effrontery to defend the Labour record on pensions. How blind can one be.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.