£350,000 bill in mine fight

Monday 21st December 2009, 10:57AM GMT.

Taxpayers in Shropshire have been left footing a bill of £350,000 in legal fees and charges stemming from a failed council bid to stop an open cast mine being built in the shadow of The Wrekin.

UK Coal took its bid to extract 900,000 tonnes of coal from a site near the beauty spot to a national planning inspector after the company claimed Telford & Wrekin Council took too long to make up its mind on the application.

The inspector ruled in UK Coal’s favour after a long – and ultimately costly – inquiry and the company now hopes to be on site by the middle of next year.

Council bosses today defended the outlay saying the level of public opposition to the scheme meant they had no choice but to fight it.

Objectors living close to the proposed site near Little Wenlock claimed their lives would be wrecked, their health harmed by the noise and dust, wildlife would be wiped out and property prices would plummet.

But campaign group, The Taxpayers’ Alliance, has hit out at the costs saying the council should not have gambled such a large amount of cash in the current economic climate.

Councillor Steve Bentley, Telford & Wrekin Council cabinet member for environment, said: “Given the strength of public concern over this application it was only right that the council fought it comprehensively on planning grounds.

“Legal costs and consultants fees amounted to around £350,000 but the council was able to secure significant alterations to the proposed method of working which will be a massive improvement to benefit local residents during the period of excavation.”

Councillor Bentley said the council also managed to get a commitment from UK Coal to spend £500,000 in the local community around the mine to improve the lives of residents.

But Fiona McEvoy, of the West Midlands Taxpayers’ Alliance, said ratepayers had every right to feel aggrieved.

She said: “In the current economic climate Telford & Wrekin Council should have assessed this situation more thoroughly before frittering such large amounts of cash.”


  1. 1
    Matt

    As a ratepayer in the district, can I thank Telford and Wrekin Council for standing up against big business in this application? And can I ask the Tax Payers Alliance to speak on my behalf only when I ask them to?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    brian2

    Maybe if the council had stood up to them earlier and not dragged their feet, especially over the health assessment report this costly public enquiry wouldn’t have been needed (especially as I read that UK coal never lose a public enquiry) the whole thing stinks. ….oh well, on the bright side, it’s £350,000 less for them to spend ruining the local road network.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Joe Henshaw

    Perhaps the Taxpayers’ Alliance should investigate how many hundreds of millions of pounds UK Coal has had from the taxpayer over the years, yet has still managed to all-but wipe-out the remaining deep-mine industry and sterilise the UK’s best coal reserves? The blame for this loss is at the hands of central government, not Telford and Wrekin; had the former not gone against its 1997 pledges on opencasting UK Coal would not have appealed, and if it hadn’t propped up this company, its shareholders, and whopping director salaries in this, it couldn’t have afforded to appeal.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Grey

    UK Coal were never going to lose that inqiry becuase there were no valid planning reaons for rejecting it in the first place. It’ll be a similar situation with the energy from waste plant. It is a waste of money, they could almost have payed for the Quantum Leap statue for Shropshire council with that.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Norman

    I presume that they took legal advice prior to taking on UK Coal, I suspect that it was probably the same people who have now dropped the bill on their toes. Win, win, in my next life I’m going to be a lawyer.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    AC

    It’s absolutely right that the council should have paid to fight this instance of big-business having no regard for the well-being of local people or the beauty of their environment.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Claptrap

    350k, thats just the legal costs, you can more than double that in terms of the amount of money wasted in council officer time. Folk in Telford need to be getting a grip and think about the bigger picture with a little research into national and local planning policy before lobbying the local authority into refusing schemes which can’t be defended at appeal. This can’t continue

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Grey

    Exactly Claptrap. They would be far better served if they instead used their time money on developments that are weak and should be improved like the Asda proposal.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Joe Henshaw

    Unfortunately the conclusion here is that there may as well not be a planning system related to opencast mining, as permission can ultimately be bought. This is very bad news for the communities who have to live with the impact of opencast mining, and very bad for democracy in general. The government should reimburse Telford and Wrekin’s fees, along with all other opencast cases similarly lost at appeal, as it is the government that has pulled the rug from under its own “presumption against” policy.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.