Star’s front row seat for sporting history
- Local newspaper week
Questions on future of costly bus routes
Saturday 14th November 2009, 8:39AM GMT.
A number of high cost bus services across Shropshire face the threat of Shirehall bosses withdrawing subsidies.
Shropshire Council is inviting public transport users to have their say on bus journeys which have a relatively high cost compared to the number of passengers carried.
The council says it is keen to enhance and improve local bus services for which it provides financial support.
But it also has to ensure that this represents good value for money, and that it has funding available to support these services.
- HOW MUCH SUBSIDY IS PAID
- To help monitor costs the council has identified services which have a high level of subsidy per passenger carried. These services (subsidy per passenger in brackets) are:
- 519 Newport-Shrewsbury, Saturday 5.55pm journey only (£9.73).
- 71a Oswestry-Four Crosses, Monday to Saturday service (£5.58).
- 323 Telford-Market Drayton, Monday to Friday service (£13.83).
- 113 Telford-Bridgnorth, Monday to Friday 7.20am journey only (£16.38).
- 221 Whitchurch-Market Drayton, Friday only service (£13.83).
People wishing to comment on the future of these transport services should do so in writing by January 4, 2010 to: High Cost Bus Service Consultation, Passenger Transport Policy, Shropshire Council Development Services, Freepost SY 522, Shrewsbury SY2 6BR.
The council claims that its passenger transport budget is currently under “considerable pressure” because of rising costs and the current financial climate.
To help monitor costs it has identified services which have a high level of subsidy per passenger carried.
The cost varies from £5.58 per passenger to as much as £16.38.
Martin Taylor-Smith, council cabinet member for strategic planning and transport, said: “In light of these high costs we are currently giving consideration to no longer subsidising these journeys.
“However, before making a final decision we are extensively consulting with councillors, town councils, local parish councils, passengers and our other stakeholders.”
The council says the responses will help it take a “balanced decision”.
It has also been claimed that the ShropshireLink rural bus service operated by the council is proving a “disaster” for Shirehall finances.
ShropshireLink is not restricted to a set route or timetable. Instead, the bus is able to travel flexibly within an area to meet the demands of users.
Senior transport executive Michael Skinner said that in six of nine areas in which the service operated, the average number of passengers was less than one a day.
According to Mr Skinner, who had obtained figures under a Freedom of Information request, the average passenger subsidy was £42.21 per person, far more than providing a taxi.
By Dave Morris
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
This may seem silly but many rural areas have few pickups however they pay their taxes so they should have public services living in the country should not make us second class citizens etc but it sems to.My point is why use large coaches?? why not mini buses??
Report abuse
Just for those who have short memories this situation has occured because of the last Tory governments privatisation of ”public” transport.
Yet another sucess story.
Report abuse
If routes are determined by cost, then technically this can no longer be called a public service.
Report abuse
this doesn’t make sense. if the subsidy is £9.73 per passenger, then if no-one takes the bus and it leaves empty then it costs nothing.
if 100 people are on the bus then it will cost £973 in subsidies?
I thought it would be the other way round! surely there should be a subsidy per route, and a number of passengers using that route? That way the subsidy per passenger goes down if more poepel use it?
Report abuse