Patient’s warning on medical details
Wednesday 28th October 2009, 10:12AM GMT.
Shropshire patients are being warned that if they complain about health services, confidential medical information about them could be released without their consent.
Patient Bert Meredith, 81, claims that his medical details were sent to his MP after he complained about the length of time that he had been waiting for a follow-up appointment at Telford’s Princess Royal Hospital.
Today the hospital trust admitted that there were some occasions when details of a patient’s care, treatment and medical history might be released to an MP.
Mr Meredith, of Allscott, Telford, said he saw a heart specialist at the hospital and was told he would have a follow-up appointment every three months.
But after nearly 10 months he had not heard anything, and so wrote a letter of complaint to Tom Taylor, chief executive of the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust.
He informed Wrekin MP Mark Pritchard of the action he was taking.
Mr Meredith said the chief executive also copied a reply to Mr Pritchard which contained medical information.
“This was released without my consent,” he said.
“People need to be aware that details about them could be released to a third party.
“What effect could this have on their job, or their insurance? That is worrying.”
Trust spokesman Adrian Osborne today said: “When a patient has concerns about the care and treatment they have received from the NHS, they will sometimes write to their MP.
“In their letter they will typically share aspects of their care, treatment and medical history.
“If their MP then raises the concerns with the NHS on their behalf, we aim to look into the issues they have raised and respond both to the patient and to the MP.
“Our response will focus on the issues about their care, treatment and medical history that they themselves have already shared with their MP.
“It is important to note that this will only happen when a patient has specifically raised their concerns with their MP, who in turn has raised them with the NHS on the patient’s behalf.”
Mr Osborne said the Data Protection Order 2002 enabled MPs to pursue concerns on behalf of their constituents, and for public bodies to respond to these concerns.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Seems to me this is another NON-story and certainly not a headline-maker! The pensioner chose to involve his MP. His MP needs to have the facts, the hospital supplied the facts, end of story. Many of us, half this gentleman’s age, rely day to day on the national health service. I, for one, am happy for my MP to know all my medical details if it helps ensure best possible care, should I choose to involve an MP on a healthcare issue. Also, why did the gentleman wait 10 months before deciding he should take action? This all sounds like a feeble attempt to knock the NHS and stir up controversy where it does not in fact exist. Incidentally, I do not work for the NHS, but have relied on its good service, day to day, throughout my life to keep me well. This report is a poor effort at tripping the NHS up.
Report abuse