Wrekin open cast mining plan approved

Wednesday 7th October 2009, 2:00PM BST.

Can’t see video? Update Adobe Flash Player
Video may take a moment to load. Return to Video Index

UK Coal today won its appeal for controversial proposals to mine 900,000 tonnes of coal in the shadow of The Wrekin.

Campaigners have been fighting the firm’s bid for an open cast mine at the site between New Works and Little Wenlock arguing it would wreck the countryside and put people’s health at risk.

UK Coal appealed after Telford & Wrekin Council failed to come to a decision over the application for the Huntington Lane site .

A public inquiry was held this year and planning inspector Andrew Mead recommended the appeal be allowed.

And today it was announced that Secretary of State John Denham had backed the planning inspector and granted permission for the proposal with a string of conditions attached.

UK Coal spokesman Stuart Oliver today said once conditions attached to planning permission were sorted they hoped to be on site by spring or early summer.

He added: “We want to be a good neighbour whilst in the community and are now going to set out our stall to achieve that.”

But Wrekin MP Mark Pritchard said local people would be furious with the minister’s decision.

“He has clearly chosen to ignore the evidence underscoring all the health and environmental concerns. I doubt people’s anger will subside before next May’s General Election,” he said.

Councillor Pat Hutchings, chairman of Little Wenlock Parish Council, said the decision was “nothing less than allowing the rape of an outstanding and historic landscape”.

Councillor Hutchings added: “What he has consented to will wreck lives, scar the landscape for generations to come and harm the local wildlife.Ê

“It would deter tourists from visiting the area and be seriously detrimental to future investment in Telford.

“It will destroy the image of Telford as a modern, clean town surrounded by green countryside.” David Wright, Telford MP, said: “I am bitterly disappointed by the decision.

“I made representations to the inquiry on behalf of my constituents and it seems that the inspector has ignored them.”

Telford & Wrekin Council leader Andrew Eade also criticised the approval of the mine.

Councillor Eade said: “This is a totally crass decision. I find it hard to believe that the Secretary of State has taken this decision in view of all the powerful arguments that we put forward and we are urgently examining every aspect of the decision with our legal team.”

Mr Oliver added: “We are delighted that the merits and benefits of this scheme have been recognised by the planning inspector who conducted the public inquiry and endorsed by the Secretary of State.

“We are particularly pleased that the importance of this coal reserve has been recognised and the conclusion that overall the proposal will have a positive affect on the economy and the economy locally.

“More than 40 conditions, covering the operation and restoration process, are attached to the consent and we hope to start discussions at the earliest opportunity with the mineral planning authority to agree and discharge those conditions, which are designed to protect the environment and those living in the vicinity of the site.”


  1. 1
    Ian

    Good. Next story?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Grey

    I can’t say I’m surprised. There were no material planning reasons for rejecting it.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Big Matty

    Great news, more jobs and a boost to the economy.

    Its a shame its in such a nice area, but if it wasn’t here it would be in another nice place.

    I’m sure the usual moaners will be along with their well thought out arguments against the mine.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Frances

    Can we please have the Veolia scheme approved now and built asap plus the Nuon Windfarm near me too, recycling targets and climate change wait for no man, let alone dithering Salopians.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    TG

    Do all the objectors for this scheme forget that telford or the former towns around was a mining area.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Y Mab Darogan

    In my view if the location was Shrewsbury this would never be allowed however as the majority of the people who live in Telford are working class it would appear that no strong opposition is forthcoming. For further evidence note the closure of services at the PRH as opposed to Shrewsbury Hospital.

    A case of double standards

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    R Jaggs

    Working Class area Telford and so a Labour minister has stuffed their own ??

    Is this the point you are trying to make Y Mab Darogan.

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    a

    this is unbelievable – such a pretty area, this is not on at all.

    As for those who say there was no valid reasons to turn it down, has anyone ever seen the dust that comes off these things, how many kids have to die of asthma before planners and government learn we need to regulate dust, especially coal dust and dust from power stations which is fine enough to penertrate deep into the lung

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    David Jones

    Oh what rubbish Y Mab.

    This part of Shropshire has a history of mining and open cast working, and the coal which remains underground there is needed. Shrewsbury on the other hand has no history of such extraction and there is no coal underneath it.

    In any case it is a Labour government which has approved this. But then Labour are hardly the party which protects the working class anymore!

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Popski

    As I posted when it was announced ‘When big business wants it, big business gets it’. The people who live local to these rapes of our countryside can protest as much as they want, in the final analysis they’ll get stamped on because there’s money to be made so who gives a damn’ about them.

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    Huw Peach

    This is further proof that we are living in the Age of Stupid ( http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/03/20/its-not-as-stupid-as-it-sounds/ ).

    We live in an age which wilfully ignores the effects of opencast mining on those in the surrounding area, who live every day with the consequences.

    We live in an age, which wilfully ignores the fact that decisions like this (multiplied across the world) make our children and grandchildren’s future less affordable.

    We live in an age, which wilfully ignores the effects of our energy choices on the 300,000 people who are dying every year as a result of climate change.

    Burning coal has a worse effect on the climate than ANY other fossil fuel.

    Not only is burning coal the biggest source of mercury in the atmosphere. Coal also emits 1153 grammes of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour.

    Compare this with wind energy which emits just 24 grammes per kilowatt hour.

    There are MORE JOBS in renewables like wind than there are in coal.

    Isn’t this time of growing unemployment precisely the moment when we should collectively grasp how stupid it is to carry on with the mistakes of the past and embrace the job-creating potential of a Green New Deal?

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    Huw Peach

    Secretary of State John Denham, who gave the go-ahead for this coal mine, recently wrote in the Independent newspaper, about what the Labour government is doing to tackle climate change.

    On Friday 4th September 2009 he talked about empowering local communities to ‘find[ing] solutions to the challenges we face today’.

    Like climate change?

    His article went on…

    ‘Taking climate change, central government can lead – as Labour did in introducing the world’s first Climate Change Bill – but it is local councils that can and do drive change on the ground, reducing waste, boosting recycling and developing greener public transport.’

    According to the article, it seems that Telford & Wrekin Council was undecided as to how to proceed with the mine and that it was the Labour government that pushed it through.

    What do others think?

    Mr Denham went on to say

    ‘The importance of local solutions and innovation is why I’m asking whether councils have all the powers they need to drive forward action in their communities on climate change. Should councils, for example, be given local carbon budgets as a spur?

    And how do we accelerate councils working with local people to determine, finance and design a shift to greener living?’

    I think that we will only accelerate councils working with local people to determine, finance and design a shift to greener living when the message from central government on climate change is unambiguous.

    At the moment the message from central government on climate change seems rather contradictory.

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    true salopian

    who gave this minister the right, it should be up to local people to decide not national people from off

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    Brian2

    Why not just concrete the whole area and build lots of high rise flats everywhere just like Birmingham….whoopee! Who needs countryside anyway? Certainly not the sort of people who move to this area.

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    Elaine Lawton

    It’s ok saying there will be jobs – but will they be for local people, or will UK Coal be bringing their own people into the area? It’s ok to say that Telford is built on a history of coal, but this is 2009, Telford is no longer a heavy industrial town and there is much development around the proposed development with yet more to come. What will happen to Ironstone and Lightmoor Village now?? And how will UK Coal put back the disturbed water courses??

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    winja

    Y Mab Darogon said:

    ‘the majority of the people who live in Telford are working class’

    For the sake of all readers, I suggest you substantiate and clarify this statement with comparative references to Shrewsbury.

    Report abuse

  17. 17
    Mitchell Edwards

    I’m with Big Matty on this one. A boost to the economy. Better getting coal from England than abroad. Plus it’s only for 3 years. They’ve said they’ll leave it in a better state than it’s in currently.

    Report abuse

  18. 18
    Rich S

    I live less than half a mile down wind from this site and it`s not so much the mining that saddens me, it`s the lies about returning it to it`s former state.UK Coal make no profit from this coal.Trust me, it`ll be another huge housing development. Thats where the true value lies.

    Report abuse

  19. 19
    W

    i dont beleive it!! this is an AONB isnt it?? how could this be allowed… has the minister ever visited this area ?

    Report abuse

  20. 20
    Pat judson

    UK Coal may have won the right to extract -but only within a certain time limit, with heavy penalties should they go over, getting the Coal out, could become harder than they ever thought possible.
    My thanks to all who fought the fight, and voiced their concerns at the Inquiry – the propoer place to have done so, debate now will get us nowhere, the times have changed overnight with this decision, and the campaign will continue.
    Pat for COTEYG.

    Report abuse

  21. 21
    Richard

    In reply to Huw Peach, we’ll live in an age where the lights go out if we don’t get new sources of energy and very quickly. Everyone complains about the costs of energy but no-one is prepared for mines, windfarms, incinerators close to them. I’m afraid it’s a price we all have to pay.

    Report abuse

  22. 22
    John

    It has already been said that once the coal has gone the land will be sold for housing. More jobs, more houses, both are needed.

    Report abuse

  23. 23
    Jet

    There is a golden opportunity here to reinstate the railway link, now partly there due to the Telford Steam Trusts efforts, then these millions of tons of coal can be shifted quickly and effiently without it all having to go by road.
    One locomotive can pull about 60 wagons, think of the saving in diesel alone.
    I am sure T&W have not forseen this.
    I must stop trying to think logical, there will be so many lorries and drivers required, – and repairs to the roads too, all creating “Jobs”!

    Report abuse

  24. 24
    Huw Peach

    I agree that we need new sources of energy very quickly, Richard, and that we need lots of new jobs, Jet.

    In another discussion I highlighted the most environmentally-friendly technologies available -http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/07/16/joy-at-windfarm-ruling/ #2.

    Which of these 7 green technologies would you be in favour of, Richard, or doesn’t it matter as long as the lights stay on?

    Would you not agree that green technologies create more jobs per kilowatt hour than conventional energy, Jet?

    ‘Feed-in tarriffs’ will come into force from April 2010 in the UK, creating a real incentive for individuals, families, neighbourhoods and wider communities to sell locally-generated green energy to the grid at guaranteed, generous rates.

    These feed-in tarriffs will provide householders or communities with a decent financial return on smaller-scale, decentralised, community-owned renewable energy schemes.

    Would you both not agree that decentralised green energy generation has the potential -if introduced by visionary local and national governments creating a generous enough incentive in the system- to simultaneously provide for the needs of the present (keeping the lights on) and the future (mitigating climate change) if we could just grasp the impact that a green industrial revolution would have on jobs and our manufacturing base?

    Report abuse

  25. 26
    Y Mab Darogan

    I very much doubt Labour are a working man’s party anymore. so that point it not valid.

    Report abuse

  26. 27
    Wal

    I think the Secretary of State must be under pressure from his boss to cover an energy gap created by a lack of forsight from governments present and past. Yes, they now realise that alternative energy sources including nuclear will take time to kick in, maybe 10 years or more(who knows). I believe that the wiser course of action would have been to continue to obtain our coal (if its really needeed) from outside sources while we can. What’s the point in using up our coal reserves before we need to, once its gone its gone and a reserve is not a reserve if you’ve used it. The way we’re going, in the very near future we will be the plaything and at the mercy of whichever country has what we need.

    Report abuse

  27. 28
    John

    Many good points have been raised here, but the good points raised are clearly in favour of coal mining.

    Report abuse

  28. 29
    Graham Bunn

    Having visited an open cast coal mine in South Wales operated by Miller argent for UK coal, local campaigners informed me that no local jobs were created, All posts at the mine were given to outside contracted workers.
    The area once extracted from this mine will add to further C02 emissions. The health risks to people living close to the mine will be at risk from the coal dust.
    The mine in Wales operates from 6am-11pm Monday to Friday and 10pm on Saturdays, The noise is never ending.
    I don’t see how extracting more coal and building new power stations fits in the the Government’s policy to reduce emissions?

    We have to face the reality that we must make radical changes to the way we live,work and consume,rethink the ethics future economies have built into them.
    Plans for this mine must be opposed by all people with a social conscience. The issues are too important to be left to political party point scoring. We need to embrace a diversity of tactics and views and not get caught up in a Nimby attitude i think.

    Maybe Huw with the resources you have you could work with other local concerned groups and plan a strategies for a way forward, Organizing with horizonatal methods to find solutions.

    Report abuse

  29. 30
    brian2

    Don’t let them fool you. This has NOTHING to do with the coal.It’s just an excuse to use the land for housing…just like the desecration of Lawley…old coal fields…like anyone would have noticed now. It’s been earmarked for over 400 houses on the Shortwoods site for years now. You have to ask yourself , if the coal wasn’t worth mining back in the seventies (privately owned then)…why is it suddenly worth big investments???

    Report abuse

  30. 31
    Huw Peach

    I think you’re right, Graham.

    What do you think of the Transition Towns approach?

    There is a Transition Towns meeting happening in Shrewsbury at the Shire Hall on October 27th at 7pm.

    http://transitiontownshrewsbury.org.uk/

    The aim is to engage the creativity of local people to find solutions to peak oil and climate change.

    Is anything similar happening in your neck of the woods?

    Report abuse

  31. 32
    AndromedaHeightz

    An Anthem for a Doomed Short Wood
    (and all respect to Joni Mitchell)

    So they’ll pave paradise
    And put up a parking lot.
    Maybe a neat new housing estate,
    Costing much more money than we’ve got.
    And so they always seem to say,
    That we don’t know what we’ve got
    ‘Til it’s gone
    So we’ll pave paradise and put up a parking lot.

    They’ll take all the trees
    But they’ll give us a smart museum?
    Then charge all the people
    A pound or more just to see ‘em
    But I’m sure it always seems to go,
    That you don’t know what you’ve got
    ‘Til it’s gone
    So we’ll pave paradise
    And put up your parking lot

    Now, hey there farmer keep breathin’
    In your clean, clean air now,
    Oh, but you don’t live round here so I s’pose
    You don’t really care though.
    And so it really seems to go,
    That we won’t know what we’ve got til it’s gone,
    Just pave paradise and put up your parking lot.

    And, yes we’ll get some nice big trucks
    Going down our busy main roads now,
    Or maybe, a lovely new golf course
    That’s not all that I’m told now.
    But hey, does it always have to go
    …(chorus)

    Maybe, soot on my washing?
    And shaky ground under my feet now,
    Grey clouds hover above me and
    My apples don’t taste very sweet now.
    But…yes you got it…(all join in now!)

    So wave goodbye to the birds,
    We will surely miss their merry tune,
    And the bees will go with them
    And won’t be coming back very soon.
    But, hey, we’ll always have a price to pay,
    And we won’t wake up until it’s all gone.
    So I’ll just have a moan today and
    Our kids can play in the parking lot(chorus repeat…)

    …yes a cliché…the words are mostly changed and the grammars’ all wrong…but still…dedicated to the ‘wish tree’ that still lives in Short Wood…AndromedaHeightz+

    Ps. Thanks for listening+

    Report abuse

  32. 33
    Richard

    Of course, Huw, we all want green energy if possible, but the first priority is ensuring we have heat and light for our homes and businesses, even if its “dirty” rather than people and the economy dying while we wait for eco-frinedly power supplies. Each winter the threat to our power supplies grows more real, and it only needs a bad winter and the Russians to turn down the gas for the luxury of arguing about green energy to become irrelevant.

    Report abuse

  33. 34
    Huw Peach

    What do you think the UK’s industrial strategy should be to get our economy back on its feet and create sustainable jobs for the future, Richard?

    What do you see as the best way to wean our economy off fossil fuel imports from other countries?

    You say green energy is a ‘luxury’.

    Greens disagree. We see it as an economic and ecological necessity.

    We see massive government investment in a green industrial revolution as the best way of strengthening the UK’s manufacturing base and an important first step along the way to UK energy security.

    Do you think it is a ‘luxury’ to imagine a possible future for our economy in 20-30 years’ time, where Britain is exporting high-tech green technologies to the rest of the world?

    The Nobel Peace Prize committee 2009 said that Barack Obama’s desire ‘for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges’ was the reason why he won this year’s prize.

    That decision is going to inspire people like me across the world.

    The difference with 10 years ago, though, is that people like me are not going to stay silent in future when poor decisions like this are pushed through.

    Report abuse

  34. 35
    Huw Peach

    To clarify…

    By poor decisions in my final sentence I mean the decision about this mine.

    Report abuse

  35. 36
    Y Mab Darogan

    The solution is nuclear power. The USA, USSR, UK, France all have nuclear power stations with very little problems over the last 30 years. What we need to do in this country is build 10 new nuclear power stations in the Uk to supply our country with energy.

    This way we will no longer have to dig up beauty spots to obtain coal.

    Report abuse

  36. 37
    Brian2

    So Richard,

    You think that 30 Months of coal for the power station is worth desecrating an acient woodland that’s been around centuries for and putting so many peoples health at risk?

    Report abuse

  37. 38
    Graham Bunn

    Yes Huw I have been to a talk on Transition Towns in Birmingham, The idea has many merits. I think peak oil is something that is not discussed enough in the mainstream media. One of the most important lessons i took from attending various climate camps was that the currant economic system can not be maintained if we are to tackle climate change seriously.
    From living in the climate camp, organizing and making decisions with anarchist values or horizontal consensus decision making seemed to be the most ethical way forward to me!
    If we are to realistically address the issue then capitalism, markets and endless growth are no longer sustainable ways to collectively organize a society. The recent financial crisis has shown the weakness of capitalism and how it tramples over most of the population of the planet in search of profit, regardless of the impact to the environment. Wrekin Stop War group plan a meeting this Tuesday to talk about recent issues. For more information please contact us through the web site.Huw It would be good to see you there.

    Report abuse

  38. 39
    winja

    Two points concerning the transitiontownshrewsbury site:

    i) The section for “minutes” is password protected. What is there to hide?
    ii) Looking at the images on the front page, it seems that the term “sandal wearers” is still more than relevant when applied to those of a green persuasion.

    ;-)

    Report abuse

  39. 40
    The Leveller

    Some high-minded stuff here, but note the fact that the T & W Council over many months failed to make a decision on UK Coal’s planning application thereby shirking its responsibility to local people and ensuring that the inevitable decision that the mine would be given the go-ahead by Sec of State.

    Yet now Eade states this is a ‘crass decison’ and that the Council is considering a legal challenge. What a joke.

    Report abuse

  40. 41
    Lucy W

    If everyone had stopped moaning and got on with it, the coal would be out, refilled with waste and relandscaped for everyone to enjoy.

    Has no-one visited the beautiful Granville Country Park in Telford or the Quarry in Shrewsbury?

    Report abuse

  41. 42
    Keith

    I am sure Huw Peach would be protesting if instead of coal extraction taking place around Telford a Nuclear power station was proposed for Ironbridge Gorge or if several hundred 135 metre tall wind turbines were proposed.
    Some people may want to live in a tented commune “at one with nature” but most of us want the use of energy for homes, hospitals, etc that are heavy users of energy with 61 million of us and growing.
    Why do the anti energy use, anti roads, etc believers stay in the UK when they would be without all these in somewhere like Chad in Africa.

    Report abuse

  42. 43
    Huw Peach

    Thanks for your kind thoughts, Keith.

    It is interesting that opponents of people, who promote ‘collective responsibility and a global response to global challenges’ (see Nobel Peace Prize), often resort to telling them to leave the country rather than dealing with their arguments.

    I’m quite keen to stay, Keith, and contribute in my own way to my country, which I love just as much as you do.

    I feel the Labour government’s decision over this mine is wrong, because it is myopic, unsustainable and totally undermines their rhetoric on climate change, and I am not willing to be silent and let it pass.

    For your information I don’t live in a tented commune, I do want to keep the lights on and I DO support wind power projects, coupled with massive investment in energy conservation.

    The Centre for Alternative Energy released a report in 2007 (just Google ‘Zero Carbon Britain’), which promotes the halving of energy consumption through energy conservation measures and massive investment in offshore wind.

    I am totally against new coal.

    But I am also totally for CAT’s sustainable approach, which needs to be discussed and debated as a matter of utmost urgency across the country.

    The Foreword to this report was written by Sir John Houghton, Former Co-Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Former Director General of the UK Meteorological Office.

    Sir John Houghton is speaking to the Stretton Climate Care at Church Stretton School tomorrow evening (Tuesday 13th October) at 7.30pm.

    At a time of mass joblessness the government should be stimulating the economy and putting it on a sustainable footing, creating construction jobs in home insulation, targeting the poorest and the most vulnerable like pensioners and families living in poverty, investing massively in sustainable industries, which the UK can manufacture and export to the world.

    Hospitals, schools and households will be able to earn money from selling green energy to the grid from April 2010.

    Is this not a positive development, Keith?

    What is your vision for energy generation for the next 20-30 years?

    Do you think people who express concerns about peak oil and peak gas should go and live in chad, too?

    Report abuse

  43. 44
    Lucy W

    Keith, you said: Some people may want to live in a tented commune “at one with nature”

    I had a similar experience camping in the car park by Loch Lomond (wild camping is permitted in Scotland). I was with two Glaswegian pals and we were ‘at one with nature’, but there were alot of other people there who were drunk, using foul language, playing loud music and generally uncouthed.

    Therefore I would urge anyone thinking of living in a tented commune by the ‘Bonney Bonney Banks’ or elsewhere to think again.

    Report abuse

  44. 45
    Lucy W

    I agree with Y Mab on Nucular Power. I visited Sellafield this year and if all my life-times energy needs came from nucleur, then the waste would be the size of a marbel.

    Look at those nuclear submarines – they’ve been out for 40 years and haven’t needed refueling – I wish I coukd say the same for my car!

    Have these Greenies visited Sellafield recently? No – they are too busy climbing on rooves making a nuisance of themselves.

    Report abuse

  45. 46
    Huw Peach

    Those Greenies on Parliament’s roof, who are far braver than you or I, Lucy W, were calling for a new style of politics in Britain, one capable of rising to meet the challenge of climate change.

    To see what sort of people they are and hear why these ordinary individuals chose to protest in this way, have a look at the 2-minute video on the Greenpeace website.

    There were over 50 people protesting from all walks of life, nationalities, and aged from early 20s to over 70.

    They felt compelled to take action and risk arrest and a criminal record because they feel that time is running out and our politicians are not matching their green rhetoric with action.

    Here is a local example of why direct action like this is now necessary:

    In September 2009 Secretary of State, John Denham, writes in the Independent that central government can ‘lead on climate change’.

    In October 2009 Secretary of State, John Denham, pushes through an unpopular open-cast mine of the dirtiest fossil fuel, which emits 1153 grammes of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour.

    (Wind, by contrast, emits 24 grammes)

    Report abuse

  46. 47
    Huw Peach

    Lucy W you mentioned nuclear waste.

    What happens if you lose your marbles to some terrorist group?

    Who looks after your marbles after you are gone?

    And after that?

    And after that?

    We need institutions to keep these materials safe for thousands of years.

    Which human institution do you know of which has lasted over a thousand years?

    Report abuse

  47. 48
    Lucy W

    Huw Peach said “Those Greenies on Parliament’s roof, who are far braver than you or I”

    Was looking at my family geneology, looking at my grandfathers Demobilisation card. He volunteered in 1915 when he was 16 years old and was dicharged 1919. A quick cross reference to his Birth Cert shows the 2 year discrepancy.

    No that is bravery Huw, not climbing on roof with a ladder.

    As for nucleur waste, may I suggest you visit the Sellafield recycling plant’s visitor centre and you might learn something. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

    Huw also said “Which human institution do you know of which has lasted over a thousand years? ” The British Monarchy?

    Report abuse

  48. 49
    Huw Peach

    Yes, going to war is braver than protesting.

    But risking arrest and a criminal record is braver than blogging, so I stand by what I said.

    Which international institution has lasted over a thousand years?

    Does Sellafield have any information reassuring people that they won’t lose your marbles or does this concern not deserve a response?

    Report abuse

  49. 50
    Lucy W

    Huw, a criminal record is no big deal, I’ve got one and it hasn’t held me back.

    Which international institution has lasted over a thousand years? Catholic Church?

    Huw lets see if you can answer a question for once – it will be a first for the Shrops Star threads!
    Q: If I drive 20,000 miles with a car emission of 261g/mile CO2 emmission, how many trees do I need to carbon off-set this?

    Report abuse

  50. 51
    Huw Peach

    Carbon off-setting as a policy is not bringing down emissions worldwide.

    Reducing emissions and switching to non-carbon energy sources reduces emissions.

    Does Sellafield have any information reassuring people that they won’t lose your marbles or does this concern not deserve a response?

    Report abuse

  51. 52
    Lucy W

    No answer, so no response.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.