PRH services to RSH ‘is best option’

Thursday 17th September 2009, 5:00PM BST.

Transferring some accident and emergency and other acute services from the Princess Royal Hospital in Telford to the Royal Shrewsbury is the best option facing health chiefs, a report revealed today.

Such a move, exclusively predicted in the Shropshire Star on Tuesday, would see the PRH lose A&E for severe trauma cases, along with acute and vascular surgery as well as in-patient paediatrics.

Members of NHS Telford & Wrekin, the Shropshire County PCT and Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, are to consider over the next fortnight recommendations made by a Clinical Leaders Forum.

For the past 18 months it has been looking at ways of shaking up the county’s hospitals in an effort to combat intense pressure on services.

For the full story see Friday’s Shropshire Star


  1. 1
    Rob

    I dont understand their thinking behind this! Telford is a fast growing town, no doubt it will be large enough to be classed as a city in a few years time. More people = more accidents etc. If we do not have an A&E in Telford, people will die!! I assume the chiefs who are proposing this idea do not live in Telford so they do not have to worry about the risks. This is a purely obsurd proposal. Once Labour is out of government or the governments debt is reduced no doubt they will decide to bring back an A&E to Telford. In the long run this will be much more expensive than to leave it there and by the time they realise what huge mistake they have made, it will cost hundreads if not thousands of lives!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Shropsman

    “For the past 18 months it has been looking at ways of shaking up the county’s hospitals in an effort to combat intense pressure on services” – less thinkers, more doers – simples !!!!!!!

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    keith dewsbery

    no no no
    when are these stupid people going to see sense
    people will die as a result of these actions
    if anyone has a heart attack in telford
    it would be better to travel 2 miles up the road
    rather then the 12 mile trip to shrewsbury
    leave our hostpital alone. no cuts people in the
    telford area do not want to live in fear

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    rob harris

    here we go again, the tail wagging the dog. Telfords opinions and needs don’t count when it comes to services but any amount of dosh is available to tart up the town centre.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    leah

    I agree with Rob about spending priorities.
    Before this MP starts kicking off about this he needs to look at where our taxes are going.
    This move is meant to save money and improve service, either money needs to be saved through actions like this or more needs to be invested to keep the services as they are.
    We can’t have it both ways!!

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    aderyn

    I would urge you all to resist this proposed transfer. In Powys there is no general hospital and an hour’s journey is the norm.We have free prescriptions at an annual cost of £30M but what good is that when you have an emergency.Our leaders prefer to build regional gin palaces rather than decent hospitals.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Bazza

    Did I miss a month or so. Was it not said earlier in the week that there would be a consultation before any decisions were made, or is this the way things are going to be,do as I say, and be greatful

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Troy Tempest

    What you have here unfortunately is an element of realism being injected into health services in Shropshire as they are in many other parts of the country. If you strip away the emotional rhetoric and actually consider the facts you may begin to see how some of this will benefit the population. You may not notice but we are in a recession at the moment and public spending is inevitably going to be cut – the reason for this is that no one wants to pay more tax yet wants all the services retained. Also Medics need to see a certain number of cases per year to remain competent to carry out procedures – especially in specialties such as emergency medicine. That therefore means that in order to ensure high standards, services would need to be consolidated so that they can get this experience. You then get a choice – do you want a 5 minute journey to a hospital where the doctors aren’t as experienced and you may not make it OR a 15 minute journey to a specialist centre where you probably will?

    Unfortunately there are also many ill informed comments when it comes to the NHS. Everyone cries we need a local hospital yet won’t pay the additional taxes needed to fund them. Then when cuts are made there is ill informed moaning (usually directed at the legions of managers that could be culled – look it up – NHS management accounts for approx 7% of workforce. Average comparable company in the private sector = 15% management). In the past this is the sort of comment that gets politicians attention and we get around 20 years of faffing on cutting management without actually considering what services are required and then realising that it is needed to actually run the service. If politicians of all colours had actually looked at the services and what was needed rather than pandering to ill informed comment it is highly likely that the NHS would not be in the state it is in today.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Kath

    “Everyone cries we need a local hospital yet won’t pay the additional taxes needed to fund them.”

    Who says? Who asked us? If people knew their taxes were going to something they approved of and not being frittered away, attitudes to taxes might be different.

    In any case there are plenty of people in this country who could well afford to pay more taxes – for useful purposes like improving hospital services instead of reducing them.

    If you’re on Facebook there’s a group for this discussion just been set up at http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=283798875156

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Kath

    “You may not notice but we are in a recession at the moment and public spending is inevitably going to be cut – the reason for this is that no one wants to pay more tax yet wants all the services retained.”

    No, the reason for this is a gutless so-called ‘Labour’ government that will cut public services before tackling tax evasion and will look on complacently as the wealth gap widens.

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    KarenK

    I am sure the health bosses know what they are talking about – they are trying to improve services by improving quality.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.