Burner fight seeks support

Tuesday 8th September 2009, 1:12PM BST.

Campaigners who spent two years fighting plans for a £5 million biomass burner in Shropshire are looking for up to £100,000 to fund a judicial review of the scheme.

The controversial plans for the plant at the Crowgate Industrial Estate in Bishop’s Castle were approved by the Planning Inspectorate last Friday.

The inspector’s decision came after an eight-day public inquiry in March and April this year.

The Bishop’s Castle Group, whose opposition helped bring the inquiry about, was outraged by the decision and at an emergency meeting last night vowed to fight on.

Group chairwoman Karen Bavastock said today: “We decided last night we are going to investigate the costs involved in a judicial review.

“Over the last three days we have had time to study the decision line by line and our members are not only outraged by the content but unanimous in their desire to challenge this decision.

“Obviously a High Court challenge is not to be taken lightly and would require a major fundraising effort but as a first step we are seeking specialist legal opinion and we will be addressing our conclusions to the Bishop’s Castle Town Council meeting next Tuesday at 8pm.

“We would urge members of the local community to attend, listen and have their say.”

Michael Dawes, vice- chairman of the group, is investigating the legal options open to the campaigners and people will be updated at the council meeting.

The group also said the developers who had applied for planning permission did not have any registered interest in the site.

A spokesman for Shropshire Council said: “No party has an option to purchase this land.

“The only legal requirement for anyone making a planning application is to serve notice of that application on the owners of the land.

“In this instance, the proposed developer served appropriate notice on the former South Shropshire District Council who raised no objections to them making this application.”

The developer, Bishop’s Castle Biomass Power Limited, has welcomed the planning inspector’s decision.

The Planning Inspector’s decision document can be accessed via www.bishopscastlegroup.org.uk

By Hannah Costigan


  1. 1
    Big Matty

    Maybe the campaigners against the burner should be a little more proactive with their approach and come up with another environmentally friendly way of creating 2.5MW of electricity on the same plot of land on the same budget!

    Doubt they have the intelligence to do that though and will just come up with more limp arguments for why they don’t want it!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    michael dawes

    What a shame that Big Matty has to hide behinda pseudonym and resort to abuse. for his information even the developers accept that the likely output of the plant is only 2MW. However the only similar plant at Eccleshal is producing far less.
    The developers own figures suggest a conversion rate of 15% when Drax can burn the same fuel at 43% effiency, hardly a sensible use of a scarce resource.
    The injspector has ducked many of the difficult issues involving the technology pushing the final approval back to the new Shropshire Council who are left with a long list of matters to determine before the development can commence.
    In particular are the issues surrounding the control of emmissions,only the standards have been set and the Eccleshall plant has failed to meetint less exacting standards and is having to undergo major modification to protect residents who are no way near as close as at Bishops Castle.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    sa

    NIMBYs – cut off their electricity if they dont like it

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    realist

    would the nimbys here please realise ironbridge is closing down, the fossil fuel era is over, we cannot go on burning coal and gas or we will all fry

    Maybe they will be able to live without power in their back yard? would they prefer a) a wind farm, b) nuclear power plant, c) PV panels on every house costing each person in Bishops Castle a mere £75,000 each d) no heating or lighting at all.

    vote now people of bishops castle!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    marco

    realist: I vote for nuclear. If the ironbridge site could be used for this then the pollution levels would drop, and the radioactive waste currently being released would be eliminated.

    and remember – nimby is now in fashion – this isn’t the 80s again where the local environment could be destroyed in the interests of profit for a few!

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.