Plan to dam River Severn

Friday 7th August 2009, 11:30AM BST.

Plans for a dam on the River Severn in Shropshire were today unveiled as part of a £30 million scheme to protect nearly 2,200 homes at serious risk of flooding downstream of Shrewsbury.

But more than 50 properties – including farms – in parts of rural west Shropshire would be in the enlarged flood plain and face more severe flooding if the scheme goes ahead.

Environment Agency chiefs hope to install a floodgate across the river beneath a bridge on Shrewsbury’s long-awaited £100 million North West Relief Road.

The dam could be ready by 2017, together with the controversial road, and would operate in a similar way to the Thames Barrier.

It could be closed in the event of a sudden rise in water levels and store excess water upstream, while lessening the severity of floods downstream.

Floodwater would then drain back into the river once flooding eases.

According to agency computer models, river levels would be up to a metre lower in Shrewsbury than they are now in the event of a “one in 50 years flooding event”.

River levels during a bad flood would drop about 80cm at Ironbridge, 26cm at Atcham Bridge and 9cm at Worcester. But villages like Montford Bridge, which lies within the proposed water storage area, could see water rise by more than a metre.

Details of the Severn Valley Flood Risk Management Scheme emerged at a special meeting called by National Farmers’ Union members at Walford, near Shrewsbury, yesterday.

Neil Baly, a farmer from near Montford Bridge, hit out at the plan and said he was “horrified”. He said: “I’m very worried. I’m going to lose half my farm.

“Has anyone considered the costs of compensation for loss of land? More houses will become uninsureable.”

Anthony Crowther, from the agency, told NFU members the scheme was “not a done deal” and would only be considered if deemed viable following consultation with landowners.

He said river levels at the dam could be 4.8m higher but get shallower upstream.

Speaking after the meeting, Paul Tullett, agency area manager, said the scheme is one of several the agency is mulling over as it prepares to tackle an increased risk of flooding in the next 50 to 100 years.


  1. 1
    H. St. John Peasbody

    £30m? And the rest!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Norman

    So they’re planning on putting in a new bridge combined with some sort of dam? I haven’t heard anyone yet suggest that they build into the structure(s) turbines to produce electric.It’s got to be easier to build in from word go than to retro fit.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Professor Mick Day

    What a ridiculous idea! The best way to deal with the flooding problem in Shrewsbury and elsewhere is to remove structures from the most flood-prone areas and convert those areas into green space. Engineering ‘fixes’ just don’t work in the long term, and create more problems than they solve.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Chris

    Prof….Perhaps they could consider removing Shrewsbury? That is a series of structures in an area prone to flooding, I wonder if it would all fit on Haughmaund and the Wrekin?

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    jim hawkins

    Well now I have heard it all. Firstly, what would be the effect of REMOVING the existing weir at Shrewsbury? What practical purpose does it serve? It is no longer required to maintain drinking water supply to the town.

    Before any damming of the Severn is carried out serious questions need to be asked how Severn Trent currently manage the advance release of water from the reservoirs. I suspect that that would lead to some interesting answers.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Simone

    Is this the same Environment Agency that upset landowners around Melverley by the *way* they went about plans for as flood-prevention water storage in the area?

    The dam idea is a red herring designed to make the road look like it’s useful rather than a blight on the landscape.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    David Jones

    Jim – as far as I’m aware, the weir was never for maintaining drinking water supplies for the town. The town used to get its drinking water supplies from various wells and sources from around the town, and not direct from the river. The weir was built as in summer the water level of the river would fall incredibly low in the town, which was not pleasant at a time when the town’s sewerage went straight into the river. The weir was therefore built to maintain the water level in the summer in the town, for aesthetic and public health purposes! Of course now our sewerage no longer goes into the river untreated, but we still need to maintain the level of the water for leisure and to some degree aesthetic purposes. You can’t have the summer regattas on a river which is only 10cm deep!!

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Bonzer

    David Jones of course you can have a regatta in only 10cm ( 4″ to those not so conversant)of water, I’m sure hovercraft racing would be lots more fun if not a little noisy.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.