Rural bus service ‘a disaster’
Thursday 6th August 2009, 10:00AM BST.
A senior transport executive claims that a rural bus service operated by Shropshire Council is proving a “disaster” for both passengers and Shirehall finances.
Michael Skinner, who works in London but still lives in north Shropshire, says that in six of nine areas in which ShropshireLink operates, the average number of passengers is less than one a day.
According to Mr Skinner, who has obtained figures under a Freedom of Information request, the average passenger subsidy is £42.21 per person, far more than providing a taxi.
“I am sure that councillors are not aware of this disaster” said Mr Skinner, who was chief officer of the former charity, North Shropshire Community Transport, which folded last year.
He said Shropshire Council had recently told the Information Commissioner it did not have figures for the costs of passenger transport provision in the county, having earlier claimed that these figures were commercially sensitive.
“It means that the cost of the council’s bus provision in the county could be running out of control but councillors have no means of knowing this,” said Mr Skinner.
Unlike a traditional bus service, ShropshireLink is not restricted to a set route or timetable.
The county has been split into nine ShropshireLink zones. Each zone is made up of several smaller areas where ShropshireLink operates on two selected days between Monday and Saturday.
Mr Skinner, chief executive of the largest community transport organisation in south London, said: “If Shropshire stopped bidding for bus contracts itself, and opened up the market, we would quickly see an improvement in services and a reduction in costs to the council tax payer.”
Phil Crossland, the council’s assistant director for strategic transport and highways, said: “ShropshireLink is currently being used more frequently than the services it replaced.
“In the first month of operation it carried over 37 per cent more passengers and last month it carried 122 per cent more passengers.”
He said the buses were also used to carry out school runs, totalling more than 35,000 trips this year.
“We are currently reviewing ShropshireLink, six months after its launch with a view to improving further the service that it provides,” said Mr Crossland.
By Dave Morris
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Let see some figures on the subsidies for urban services also. I regularly look at buses as I drive past them, and usually they are either empty or carrying a handful of people.
Buses, generally bad for the environment and bad for the tax payers pockets! Scrap them all and save me some money!
Report abuse
If Arriva moved a bit faster with their vehicle modernisation in the area, buses would actually be good for the environment – they’re pretty green these days.
Don’t forget that it is still the case that most bus services operate commercially and without subsidy. This is especially the case in the more urban areas.
Presumably the Shropshire Link plan came about because subsidised regular services in very rural areas were costing too much to run – and in that case, the council *had* to do something. But whether they were costing the sort of subsidy per passenger that Mr Skinner claims Shropshire Link is costing hasn’t been revealed.
The trouble is that these services aren’t truly flexible (for one thing, they’re not even available at certain times on schooldays…) and I shouldn’t think it is very appealing to be ‘taxiied’ by these minibuses to a bus stop (usually with no shelter or indication of how the service is running)and left wait for a a ‘mainstream’/conventional bus service.
I wonder whether it is being run correctly – do people in the council’s contact centre (who probably have little knowledge of bus services or county geography) really have the skills? I suspect they don’t.
One other thing – I seem to recall that Mr Skinner’s defunct organisation – North Shropshire Community Transport – folded either directly or indirectly as a result of the introduction of Shropshire Link. So is it not at least *possible* that he has an axe to grind here?
Report abuse
While we are on the subject of buses can we also scrap bus lanes? I often ask why poor people need to get where they are going faster than I do! Maybe the benefits office will close or the unfortunate passengers may miss some important daytime TV.
Report abuse
This is an outrage! this mess is typical of labour subsidising the poor all the time with MY taxes
we must axe buses now and build more roads , car is king, motorists rule ok, we the conservatives will invest more in roads and make your fuel cheaper unlike clown brown who just taxes and taxes
Report abuse