Star’s front row seat for sporting history
- Local newspaper week
Keep your hands off my high heels
Thursday 6th August 2009, 9:04AM BST.
The Trade Union Congress has proposed a motion arguing that high heels are “demeaning to women” and contribute to “long-term injuries”.
Instead the TUC says women should wear “sensible shoes” and proposes a one inch heel limit.
“Wearing high heels can cause long-term foot problems, such as blisters, corns and calluses, and also serious foot, knee and back pain and damaged joints,” said the TUC.
“More must be done to raise awareness of this problem so that women workers and their feet are protected.”
However, Shropshire Star Business Editor Amy Bould has a somewhat different opinion:
“I own a pair of five inch red patent shoes with a one inch platform. They are killer heels – shiny, sexy, cute and vertigo-inducing.
Wearing them, I am transformed from a 5ft 4in average height working mother-of-two into a 5ft 10in business journalist who feels she can take on the world.
The Imelda Marcos of the Shropshire Star, I have heels in all colours of the rainbow, with bows and diamantes, strappy sandals in gold and silver and mules with feathers on top. Of course, they’re not all I wear for work – just like I’d never come in without lipstick and in a bikini.
Like millions of women working in an often male-dominated environment, my shoes are part of a work uniform which means I can at least look most of them in the eye.
So it’s laughable, isn’t it?
Only a bunch of men in suits could come up with the idea that high heels should be banned in the workplace.
The TUC, of mostly male members, thinks women should all be wearing sensible shoes so that we don’t feel demeaned.
To add insult to injury they say they’re also concerned about the long-term damage to our feet.
Women in the workplace have enough hoops to jump through to be seen as equals. And let’s face it, if we can go through childbirth, I think we can manage a couple of bunions.
I suspect the small men of the TUC just find women towering above them intimidating, and are happy to have women wearing the heels in the bedroom but not in the boardroom.
Will someone please introduce the Clarks-wearing fossils to Monsieur Louboutin – preferably on the end of a stiletto?”
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Is this the March of H&S?
Report abuse
I couldn’t agree more if you feel happy with how you look you should be able to wear them. A happy worker is a productive one. I only wish the same could be true for hair color/piercings often i have been told not to dye my hair or remove my piercings but why? They remind me of who I am. This makes me happy and ready to take on the world however 9 times out of 10 I am asked to remove them at work. It isn’t just for health and safety reasons either, its so not to cause offense to customers etc. I don’t understand what is offense about just wanting to be me.
Report abuse
This is why trade union membership has declined so sharply over the last couple of decades. You can just imagine the self righteous, beligerent, sensible shoe wearing lady, beg your pardon, no offence meant, I should have said, female trade unionist, who put this motion forward. The TUC has exposed itself to ridicule at a time when there are so many more important issues to be debated.
Report abuse
Theses days, the unions are nothing more than a sad joke – stuffed silly with neo marxist, politically correct oddballs.
Report abuse