Town revamp gurus ditched

Friday 24th July 2009, 2:37PM BST.

Telford & Wrekin Council has ditched the private firm charged with regeneration in the borough and taken over the job itself, it emerged today.

The council’s own regeneration chief, Councillor Eric Carter, said that changes in the economy had prompted the move to dump Transforming Telford. He said that a rethink in the delivery of regeneration was now needed.

The council, which is set to approve the move in October, said regeneration remained a high priority and businesses would continue to receive the same services as they did already, except they would be delivered by the authority from next April.

Council spokesman Nigel Newman said the move had come from the authority, the Homes & Communities Agency and Advantage West Midlands, which are the main partners funding Transforming Telford, which is led by chief executive Sarah Raper.

He said: “Unemployment levels in the borough remain below the regional average and have stabilised in recent months but remained at 4.8 per cent in June.

“The change, which followed discussion by Transforming Telford’s board and Telford & Wrekin Council’s cabinet, comes as the council and its partners will need to provide stronger links to improve skills to increase job growth and focus on helping the area and the borough’s existing businesses to move out of recession.”

Councillor Carter, cabinet member for regeneration, said: “Given the changes that have happened in the economy, we feel it’s right that we should change the way these important services are delivered and that resources are targeted to ensure we continue to create sustainable jobs, often from existing businesses in the borough, and give our residents the skills to secure those jobs.”

Peter Roach, chairman of Transforming Telford, said he was “very disappointed” economic development and regeneration may no longer be provided by the company but welcomed the assurance that a similar high level of support would still be available through the council.

He added: “These proposals do mean a difficult time for our staff and our priority will be to support them through this period of potential change.”

By Simon Hardy


  1. 1
    Bemused of Dawley

    I don’t particularly agree with councils bringing in consultants for advice and it would be nice to hear that this is the result of cost saving exercise. But having seen the council’s efforts on other fronts such as roads, anti social behaviour etc. do they honestly believe that they have required expertise to manage this project – and if so why did they employ and agency to do it for them? and at what cost?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    w

    surely in a recession we should plough as much money into regeneration and supporting businesses as we possibly can ?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Rodney Nosnail

    Bemused > I was under the impression that Transforming Telford had quite a few public officials as part of its board anyway, so it won’t make much difference, but it will save taxpayers a lot of money by avoiding duplication of effort and people.

    I do sincerely hope that there was no “golden early-goodbye” involved as part of the original package.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    ndb

    It will free up some money to pay the electricity bill for unnecessary traffic lights.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Anon of Telford

    Rodney – I can assure you that there is no Golden early goodbye – especially for the six who have just lost their jobs. Think about that for a minute and consider how they feel. And for the record, the council have nobody capable of bringing regeneration to Telford in the way that the officers of Transforming Telford could have – nobody employed by the Council is intelligent enough or has enough vision for a project this size. Telford people have just missed out on a fantastic opportunity to bring Telford screaming up to date with the rest of GB. Now, Telford will just be “another roundabout to avoid at all costs”…. just as it was 40 years ago.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Brian2

    Transforming Telford a private firm???

    Surely it is funded by our council tax? I’m sure that I read that it gets about a million of council taxpayers money from the council.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Brian2

    Is this not the same company that started life by calling itself Telford First and then realised that there was already a restigered company of the same name?

    How professional are these people if they can’t even get their name registered correctly?

    Good job they aren’t wasting any more of our money then!

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    Tory Boy

    good news – well done to the conservatives of telford council for getting rid of the bueruocrats in their ivory towers pushing paper around all day – the more staff sacked from the public sector at the moment the better, business needs tax cuts not ‘gurus’ on gold plated pensions advising them how to run their on businesses!

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    oswestrian

    this is like Alice in Wonderland – the staff from TT were drawn from people who were employed by Telford and Wrekin Council, who set up the company because they thought it could attract funding more easily than the Council could – are all these people to re re-absorbed by the Council, or are they getting redundancy money, leaving the Council to advertise for the staff they need to do the jobs that were being done before TT was set up?

    Come on T&W – come clean on this!

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    local resident

    what this really shows, like the credit crunch showed us all, is that actually very often the private sector is badly managed, inefficient and not good value for money, look at the rail ways and look at the water companies, very often private sector has been worse than the public sector and this was the case with ”transforming telford” the private company set up to replace the councils economic development team, they have failed, and actually a not for profit in house council team will do more for less, so well done to telford council for realise what we all know about the outsourcing of council services, it aint all its cracked up to be, it often means profit for a few and service reductions for the many

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    Jet

    I can only concurr with “Bemused”.
    Who designed that awful Trench roundabout?
    That one should have been good for a “Turner Prize”.
    I am missing out here, perhaps T&W should have consulted me first?

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    Bill Bird

    Thank God for that they were some of the most totally useless jobsworths that I’ve ever had the misfortune to waste have my time with. Actually worse than the LSC and that’s putting it into perspective.

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    Rodney Nosnail

    Brain2 @ 5 > you are right on all three. It IS a private company. It IS wholly or substantially funded by (council) taxpayers and it DID get a lot of money from the council. Searching the biographies of many of the management may open everybody’s eyes a bit.

    local resident @ 7 > Please don’t confuse this private company with “proper” private companies. I have some sympathy for your general argument, but creating private companies with taxpayers’ money is one way that councils can avoid local democracy, by claiming that as a private company, they don’t have to listen to public opinion. If you don’t believe me, take a look at the page on their web site titled “Funding Support”. TT do (did) have a group of salaried employees acting as “The Investment Team”; in return for being paid a shed-load of money, their main job was NOT to achieve funding or investment for projects, rather, simply to direct enquiries to organisations like Business Link and MAS – in other words, paid advisors shunting enquiries to other paid advisors.

    oswestrian @ 6 > You’re correct about the past and I’m afraid that you’re probably correct about the future.

    Keep an eye on the key players and see where they all are in six months time. I’m pretty certain that they won’t have been allowed anywhere near a proper private company. Once in public sector management, there’s a tendency for managers to forget that the money has to be earned in order to be spent and an even bigger tendency to not know the value of money, or where it comes from. That’s how these projects lead to the gobbling up of so much council tax, and I’m sure that there would be a lot of room for savings without diminishing services.

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    dean smith

    i agree with local – the council staff will do a better job at this, not for profit, outsourcing tourism and economic development to the private sector was a ‘fashion’ for councils in the last ten years, but there is no evidence it worked, and alot of evidence that councils can drive the economy forwards with committed local authority staff working hard with the resources of the public sector behind them

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    Grey

    I couldn’t care less who is responsible I just wish the revamp would happen faster.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.