Tory leader’s change vow
Tuesday 26th May 2009, 8:00AM BST.
Conservative leader David Cameron today pledged a radical overhaul of the political system to win back public trust in the wake of the MPs’ expenses sleaze row.
Mr Cameron promised greater “decentralisation, transparency and accountability” – and went on to say that he would hand back decisions to the “man and woman in the street”.
He said beneath the anger over the expenses scandal was a deeper discontent over a feeling of powerlessness and people’s “slow but sure realisation they have very little control over the world around them”.
Mr Cameron said he would limit the power of the Prime Minister by considering fixed-term Parliaments – ending the right of Downing Street to control the timing of general elections – and the use of the Royal Prerogative which allows the PM to make major decisions in the name of the monarch.
The role of MPs would be enhanced under a Tory government by giving them free votes on legislation at committee stage – with text alerts going out to the public about the progress of Bills.
Councils would be strengthened and allowed to reverse Whitehall decisions about public services, such as the closure of post offices and railway stations.
And he promised to publish the expenses of all public servants earning more than £150,000.
Speaking ahead of a keynote speech in Milton Keynes, Mr Cameron said: “I believe the central objective of the new politics we need should be a massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power.
“From the state to citizens; from the Government to parliament; from Whitehall to communities. From the EU to Britain; from judges to the people; from bureaucracy to democracy.
“Through decentralisation, transparency and accountability we must take power away from the political elite and hand it to the man and woman in the street.”
Mr Cameron’s proposals follows a call from Health Secretary Alan Johnson urging Gordon Brown to hold a national referendum on electoral reform.
By London Reporter Sunita Patel
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
With the coming to power of ex President Blair, Parliament and our democracy was effectively emasculated. Many MPs of the Labour Party will say that they were bye-passed by 10 Downing Street (a good example being the Iraq war with all the deceit/decisions going on behind closed doors), Committees have been loaded with Labour Party hacks loaded and instructed by Party whips and the Parliamentary process itself was a mockery. Another example of Downing Street (Executive) interference was the Judiciary, the key appointments to the judiciary (not admitted but clearly influenced by a QC wife)and sentencing policy where Government has clearly instructed judges and magistrates to reduce sentences both in terms of their type and duration.
The expenses scandal has been the catalyst that now brings to the fore, the need for wholesale, root and branch change of what purports to be our democracy which is in fact, the most cunning and cleverly hidden autocracy bordering on dictatorship in the western world.
On Sunday, we had Clegg from the Lib Dems advocating thorough change on the Politics Programme, yesterday we had Johnson and Milliband coming from Labour wanting change and today we have Cameron wanting to take every vestige of Parliament apart to bring in a new regime.
What I would ask politicians of all parties is, why is it only now, after the proverbial really hits the fan, does all and sundry start wanting change. Labour have had twelve years to bring in change yet they have overseen the greatest threat to our democracy with Blair stamping all over the place to deny the electorate any power at all. Indeed Blair would have done away with back bench MPs having power if he could have got away with it, let alone the electorate. The electorate to Blair were akin to a load of serfs and thickies. Only he and his friends knew what was good for them.
Cameron has been in charge of the Tory Party – what, some 3 years. I have heard him oppose Lib Dem proposals for “proportional representation” but I have heard nothing else come from him during that time – albeit there have been a few weak comments advocating “fixed term parliaments”. As for the Lib Dems, who has heard anything from them other than “proportional representation”. A discredited system where the best example is Italy where, because of it, they are forced to have coalition governments with elections every year. Even if we had it the best the Lib Dems would do is gain a few more MPs – they certainly would not gain power.
Our democracy does need root and branch change, from top to bottom and in every nook and cranny. If my MP is on the fiddle, I want a mechanism where I and others of a like mind can hold him/her to account and sack him. I want the Prime Minister to draw his powers from MPs assembled in Parliament, not him in Downing Street making the decisions and confronting MPS with a fait accompli.
Yes, now all three parties are wanting change, pity none of them wanted it sooner and I think we can be forgiven for being a little cynical as to their motives and timing. I think fiddled expenses has much to do with it.
Report abuse