Star’s front row seat for sporting history
- Local newspaper week
Protests as mine inquiry begins
Tuesday 28th April 2009, 11:50AM BST.
A proposed opencast coal mine in the shadow of The Wrekin would blight the lives of residents for years to come, due to noise, dust and vibration from blasting, a top planning barrister claimed today.
It would mean a return to the past for Telford which has been shedding its reputation for “dereliction and poor quality landscape,” said Mr John Steel QC. He claimed a mine would fly in the face of local and national planning policies.
He said a mine would harm an area of outstanding natural beauty and would result in a new road, cutting straight through historic mine workings which are a scheduled ancient monument.
Mr Steel was making his opening statement on behalf of Telford & Wrekin Council at a public inquiry at Grays Hotel in Telford Town Centre.
The inquiry, expected to last six weeks, will hear evidence from UK Coal and the council as well as residents, campaign group Friends of the Ercall and MPs David Wright and Mark Pritchard.
UK Coal wants to extract 900,000 tonnes of coal and 250,000 tonnes of fireclay over three years from fields and woodland at Huntington Lane, near Little Wenlock and New Works, followed by restoration.
It says the council’s case is “seriously deficient” and the mine would boost the economy and help meet the Government’s desire for Britain to make more of its own energy.
Mr Steel told the inquiry: “The area is highly popular for recreation, used by local residents and tourists alike, drawn by the iconic Wrekin Hill and ease of accessibility from the centre of Telford.”
Mr Steel said the economic benefits of a mine would be far outweighed by the harm to people’s lives, the environment and Telford’s image.
The inquiry continues.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

Well done to the protesters!
Keep up the pressure!
In the new film, The Age of Stupid ( see http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/03/20/its-not-as-stupid-as-it-sounds/ ), Shropshire actor, Pete Postlethwaite, plays the part of an old man living in the globally warmed and destroyed world of 2055, watching film footage from 2008 and asking: why didn’t we stop climate change while we had the chance?
In view of the repeated warnings from scientific institutions about climate tipping points and the dangers of burning new coal, it is hard not to conclude that the people promoting a new era of coal-mining and aviation expansion really want us all to stay in this myopic Age of Stupid.
NASA’s Jim Hansen, who has been warning about climate change since the late 1980s, recently came to Coventry and told hundreds of climate activists, ‘coal is the single greatest threat to civilisation and all life on our planet.’
As well as destroying the local environment and polluting the air, burning coal in this country is going to make the lives of some of the poorest people in the world much, much worse.
Surely the time is now right for people to put aside reservations about renewable technologies like wind and solar and to start supporting them vocally.
Many governments around the world now recognise that the way to stimulate their economies out of the downturn is a Green New Deal to promote a green industrial revolution.
Our government will only do so if the pressure is great enough, so I wish the protesters the very best of luck.
Report abuse
People would support wind power if it worked. Continuously. But it doesn’t. You need “on demand” capacity in the system which wind power cannot supply. (Personally I wuite like them, but they are not the answer)
Tidal power should have more investment as the resource is practically infinite, but we are a long way off from a practical and reliable system.
Short term we are going to need coal or nuclear to keep the lights on in UK. Debate should cease and building should commence!
Report abuse
Thanks for engaging, Lester, and apologies for missing your post at first.
Obviously, I don’t accept what you say about wind.
Massively investing in wind (off-shore and onshore), other renewables and in energy conservation is the way forward, if we want to create JOBS in the short term.
This is also the way forward if we want our children and grandchildren to be able to afford the future, in the long term.
You say, ‘Debate should cease and building should commence!’
I can only respond that climate science should be heeded.
New coal projects should cease.
And instead, a Green Industrial Revolution, funded by an ambitious Green New Deal ( http://www.shropshirestar.com/2008/07/21/experts-call-for-credit-and-climate-crunch-action/ )should commence.
Ignoring the appalling consequences of coal-burning and trying to shut down debate can only be described as myopic.
The British public are concerned about job losses caused by the economic downturn (2,400 in Shropshire in 8 months – http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/04/22/budget-county-job-losses-mount/ ).
Green, sustainable industries of the future will create many MORE JOBS than the unsustainable industries of the past.
It therefore seems astonishing that the Labour government can promote coal and aviation expansion and only invest a tiny £100m of this year’s Budget in tackling climate change.
John Steel QC is quoted at the end of the article as saying, ‘the economic benefits of a mine would be far outweighed by the harm to people’s lives, the environment and Telford’s image’.
I agree.
And I would add that the short-term benefits of a mine are also outweighed by the long-term costs for our climate and our economy in the future (see Stern Report, October 30th 2006).
If we can create MORE JOBS with a more constructive view of the future, let’s move in that direction instead, and invest in a future which our kids can afford.
Report abuse