Health fears over mining plan
Thursday 16th April 2009, 3:59PM BST.
Controversial proposals to mine 900,000 tonnes of coal from the edge of Telford could have adverse effects on the health of residents living close to the site, a new study claimed today.
Dust and grit blown from the proposed site near Little Wenlock could impact on health, report authors said today. The findings into the potential effect of UK Coal’s proposals to surface mine near Little Wenlock were revealed in a draft Health Impact Assessment published today.
The draft report by independent consultants was commissioned by Telford & Wrekin Council, which has objected to the firm’s plans for land at Huntington Lane, near Little Wenlock.
It said: “The responses submitted to the council regarding this application show many instances of people describing adverse effects of changes to the landscape, loss of a place to escape to, loss of land that is valued for what it currently is, loss of land that is used for walking, recreation and education.
“This can be profoundly disturbing and is likely to adversely affect levels of physical activity, levels of mental health and sense of well-being.
“These effects will be most noticeable in New Works and the surrounding settlements.”
The report said: “The health impact assessment has found potential effects on health from this proposed surface mine site. The majority of the adverse effects will be felt most often by people who are very local to the site.”
Authors of the report said there “will be direct effects on physical health from emissions to air. Air emissions always have an effect on health. In this instance these effects will be small and unlikely to be detectable”.
It added: “The process of carrying out mining of the coal in the area will give rise to dust and grit, as a direct result of the mineral abstraction.
“Dust may pose a threat to health from grit on windy days entering the eyes of people in the vicinity, and causing possible minor irritation or minor injury.
“It is more likely that the health effects of dust will be felt at a psychological level.
“There is anticipation that the operation of the coal extraction will be a dirty and dusty affair.
“The very presence of this dust is likely to have an effect on psychological health and well-being.”
The report says without close examination of data it is not possible to say exactly what the effects of noise were likely to be.
A public inquiry has now been called, on April 28, after UK Coal appealed against the council’s delay in making a decision.
The firm claims it would make safe an area riddled with old mine workings, create 90 jobs and help meet national demand for coal.
There would also be a Minerals Trust Fund of £500,000 to be administered in the local area.
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
surely this is a historic and symbolic natural monument for shropshire, how on earth could anyone in their right mind consider digging it up
Report abuse
Of course it would all that dust and noise
Its not just the dirty soot and dust which gets on your laundry, its the stuff you cant see thats really nasty especially the fine particles of less than 10 microns in diametre, aka PM10, this stuff is dangerous as it can get deep into the lung and cause breathing difficulties.
If you think thats bad then wait til you get a better microscope again and look closer at particles less than 2.5 microns, these are really risky, in particular, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicates that PM2.5 leads to high plaque deposits in arteries, causing vascular inflammation.
Not nice.
Report abuse
Friends of the Ercall would like to thank all the people who supported the call for an HIA, took time to write and fill in questionaires, E mail the consultancy company, or did their bit to get this report for the people of Telford who would be affected IF the mine went ahead.
We would also like to thank the S Star, and Radio Shropshire who have covered the long road from first call, to reality report.
Mr M Barkers comments to day on local radio, of “yes worth the money, valuable report, physical health aspects, never undertaken before”, were all very welcome, and reinforced our concerns for the health of those who would have this mine imposed upon them.
As this is an unbiased report, with good content, scope and depth of reasearch, we would recommend everyone who can go online to read it – you have indirectly paid for it – its YOUR report, and will now go on to become a useful reference tool in the campaigns against opencast miningcountrywide.
READ the comments on UK Coals proposed 5oo metre air quality monitoring zone – considered inadequate for the protection of human health – should be 1km due to concerns over dust levels within 1 km of the site.
Freinds of the Ercall welcome the HIA – and hope to persuade the Inspector to allow us to present this at the Enquiry as it contradicts MANY points of UK Coals evidence, in air quality reports, and others too.
The 500 metre actual buffer zone and HIA, that Scotland and Wales have as compulsory, MUST, now be addressed by the Government sothat we in England have health protection parity as the rest of the UK have.
This is the reason for the protest at the opening of the Eqnuiry April 28th, 9.30 -10 am ,GRAYS HOTEL, Telford centre – you can see in the report the concerns for the dust and particulates, join us and tell the Government to protect ENGLISH people aginst this now.
Pat, Friends of the Ercall.
Report abuse
well done all on the campaign, lets hope this is a final nail in the coffin of this fossil dinosaur, lets have more wind power on the wrekin not coal mines
Report abuse
If we are going to move away from large centralised power plants using fossil fuels, to decentralised energy systems, which provide jobs locally, then the Efficiencity computer animation on the Greenpeace UK site might give some idea of what the future could look like.
At a time when people are losing their jobs in Shropshire, decentralised energy would be sustainable, it wouldn’t destabilise the climate and it would create more local jobs in Shropshire.
Report abuse
Sorry Huw, but I don’t do long words, are you saying that the coal mine is ok as long as it goes to the local power station?
Good to hear that Greenpeace have turned their back on terrorism and using cartoons to get their message across – I think they will be taken more seriously now.
Report abuse
Climate change is real.
This reality is accepted by the overwhelming majority of the world’s climate scientists but denied by Lucy W and anonymous websites funded by vested interests.
Lucy W knows better because those pesky IPCC scientists use long words like ‘fossil fuels’, ‘carbon dioxide’ and ‘climate change’.
NASA’s James Hansen used a few long words, too, when he spoke to hundreds of climate activists in Coventry Cathedral on March 19th 2009, but in spite of this we concentrated really hard.
Hansen said: ‘Coal-fired power plants are factories of death’.
Have you considered watching the film, The Age of Stupid, Lucy?
You’ll be doing your bit for Shropshire, because local actor, Pete Postlethwaite is in it.
See http://www.shropshirestar.com/2009/03/20/its-not-as-stupid-as-it-sounds/
Postlethwaite plays the part of an old man living in the devastated world of 2055, watching “archive” footage from 2008 and asking: why didn’t we stop climate change while we had the chance?
You may not enjoy it, though, Lucy because it uses cartoons to get its quite simple message across.
The clue to the message is in the title by the way. I’m sorry one of the words has 2 syllables.
Report abuse
They are not not going to flatten the wrekin, it’s next to the wrekin.
Report abuse
Of course this opencast project will go ahead,they’d better get used to it, when big business wants it, big business gets it, the local people should accept this and go and sling their collective hooks because where profit’s concerned the public’s totally ignored !.
Report abuse
true what they say, dust is deadly
Report abuse
RGA Dave, what happens when public confidence in free market globalisation collapses, and EVERYONE of every political hue is talking about regulation of big business?
Also, will big business still get its way if it has been bailed out by the world’s taxpayers?
Report abuse
we must stop this mine
Report abuse
if you dont want a coal mine, STOP USING SO MUCH ELECTRICITY PEOPLE! go on turn it off and insulate your home instead
Report abuse
People need free insulation to save money at this difficult time.
A national government-funded insulation and energy strategy would also create new jobs.
Report abuse
Huw, I dont need free insulation, I sleep under two duvets – it really is simple.
Why should tax payers like me fund government schemes so people can walk around their homes in next to nothing?
Report abuse
They don’t want coal dug up, but they all want to watch tv, turn on lights etc.
What a bunch of hypocrites.
The land can be put to better use than left as it is, nymby’s the lot of them.
Report abuse
Charities like Age Concern and Help the Aged and political pressure groups like the National Pensioners Convention remind the British public every year of the thousands of pensioners who die from cold-related illnesses every winter.
Are you in denial about this scandal, too, Lucy W?
Report abuse
Nobody is perfect, Dig it up.
Would you prefer that society waits for a group of completely, irreprochably green people to come along before it takes action?
This is unlikely to happen until the changes become societal. Hypocrisy is unfortunately one of those parts of the human condition which is not going to go away.
But anyone with common sense and the ability to anticipate future events, whether thay are a hypocrite or a person of total, blind integrity like Dig it up, can see that government action on climate change is vital if we are concerned about a viable, sustainable economic system to take us into the 21st century.
Digging up coal and burning it wilfully and -yes!- STUPIDLY ignores the imperative of ensuring a future for our children, Dig it up.
Yes, the public needs energy for our TVs and lights.
That is why the public is demanding green, renewable energy.
Yes, many of the new digital TVs are energy-guzzlers.
That is why the public are demanding better design for our consumer products from manufacturers, who are supposed to be responsive to every demand and need of ‘the market’.
Efforts to REDUCE DEMAND are happening in local government and businesses, too, and are helping to create jobs and save money.
Telford and Wrekin Council has signed the Nottingham Declaration, which publicly commits it and the other 300 signatory councils to REDUCING DEMAND and REDUCING CO2 emissions.
(Conservative-controlled Shropshire Council has admittedly NOT signed this declaration yet, but we will work on that.)
The Carbon Trust is working with businesses across the UK to help them REDUCE their carbon emissions and save money.
Finally, I am not a NIMBY, Dig it up.
I live in Shrewsbury, but I support Friends of the Ercall and TANC in their campaigns to protect their environment.
Report abuse
I can’t help but feel that this land will be dug up at some point. Then lets create more social housing for the nearly 15,000 on the housing waiting list and the homeless.
More green areas need to be used for the self same reason.
Report abuse
What do you think of the Empty Homes Agency’s campaign to use the 1 million empty homes in the UK, John?
Report abuse
Well Huw said it: “Hypocrisy is unfortunately one of those parts of the human condition which is not going to go away.”
So are you going to take in an old person this winter into your eco-friendly insulated house?
And do you have a spare room? Perhaps you could let a homeless person use it, afterall whats the difference between someone having an empty house or just a room?
By the way the so called 1 million empty homes are uninhabitable and many are dangerous. There is legisalation giving local authorities the power to take possession, renovate and collect the rent until the costs are repaid – then possession reverts to the owner.
The practical facts are is it would be cheaper for housing associations to build new than renovete, hence the owners have not taken action.
Have you never stopped and thought why the legislation (I think its the Housing Act 2004) has only been use about 6 times? Well I’ll tell you why – because its only piece of pathethic legislation our Parliment turf out to keep the do-gooder voters happy. That’s the problem with democracy.
I don’t know who this so called Agency is, but why don’t you give them some money or remotgage your house and buy an ‘empty’ home to provide for the homeless?
What is required is a little less talk and a lot more action.
Report abuse
Talk OR action, Lucy W?
It is transparently obvious that you want NEITHER.
You deny climate change and want NO action to cut carbon emissions.
You deny that speed kills on the roads and want NO action to make the roads safer for children.
You deny that poverty exists in this country and want NO action to support people who are losing their jobs in their thousands.
Now you even deny that thousands of pensioners die from cold-related illnesses every winter.
A healthy democracy is one which accepts reality as it is.
Maybe that is why you dislike it so much.
Could we return the discussion to coal, now?
Report abuse
Huw, I let my house to the homeless whilst living in an eco-froendly dwelling. How about you?
Only last week I helped poor retired people grow heir own veg. Saves on food miles as well. How about you?
I think I tick the ‘action’ box. How about you?
Report abuse
Because you -like most climate change deniers on these threads – are anonymous, Lucy W, no-one can verify what you say.
However, I think readers might agree that your views in this thread, http://www.shropshirestar.com/2008/10/07/shock-figures-on-area-housing-crisis/#comment-53462 , (#11 + #13) paint a slightly different picture of your views about the homeless.
Back to coal now…
In #7 I mentioned Jim Hansen from NASA, who spoke in Coventry in March 2009 at a rally organised by Christian Aid.
Hansen said, ‘coal is the single greatest threat to civilisation and all life on our planet.’
Report abuse