2,500 homes bid for town
Saturday 28th March 2009, 3:00PM GMT.
A total of 2,500 homes could be built in the centre of Telford over the next seven years, it was revealed today.
The development, if approved, will then be used to support other major proposed projects designed to transform Telford Town Centre, such as the long-awaited creation of a link road between the A442 and the M54.
New multi-storey car parks could also be built to encourage people to park and walk into the centre and the ice rink would be replaced.
Telford Library would be transformed into a Media and Learning Centre and the Southwater area, including the square, lake and Town Park, would be improved.
The proposals are part of a massive development blueprint, unveiled by Telford & Wrekin Council today, called the Central Telford Area Action Plan.
It covers the Town Centre, Central Park, Old Park, Hollinswood and Malinslee areas and allows space for shops to be increased by two thirds and office space to shoot up by 50 per cent.
Vision
Plans are also in place to make the centre more easily accessible for bus passengers, cyclists and pedestrians, as well as for motorists.
Council chiefs behind the ambitious plan believe it will transform the centre of the town between now and 2016.
Councillor Miles Hoskin, the council’s cabinet member for environment, said: “This gives a clear plan to deliver the vision that the council, its partners and the community have for the town centre and the surrounding area.
“It shows how the centre can become a thriving and vibrant place where people live, work and visit to enjoy their leisure time and not somewhere people think shuts when the shops close.”
The action plan, to be considered by Telford & Wrekin Council’s ruling cabinet on April 6, proposes building most of the homes in the town centre and adding 77,000 square metres of non-food, retail space.
An additional 110,000 square metres of office space is also being allowed for.
Funding would come from the council and a variety of sources, including the Government. The plan has been drawn up after consultations with a range of groups over the last five years.
By Simon Hardy
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
better there than dumping all these houses on scenic shropshire i say
Report abuse
Hellford
Report abuse
Why not build them in Birmingham – plenty of derelict land there and it’s where most of the new residents will come from.
Report abuse
Not true Patrick, what about all the kids of Telford’s teenage mothers? They’ll all have kids themselves within the next 15 years…
Report abuse
Hope there are some jobs left for them….
Report abuse
Get them built I say. Fair point Grey, I agree.
Report abuse
no thanks
Report abuse
Build new houses on brown area’s in Birmingham, Wolves etc not in telford
Report abuse
Definitely time to move…..
Report abuse
Of for crying out loud, 2000 by 2016 homes is nothing in the grand scheme of things not when Telford as a whole has to have about 30,000 by 2026. Town centre living should be promoted because of its sustainable credentials. It would support a critical mass for services, good accesibility for those residents and would hopefully contribute to a decent bit of nightlife or activity beyond that monstrous shopping mall.
None of you people want any houses in greenfield locations, nor do you want them in town centre locations and yet you still cry out about high house prices. Well something has to give and saying they should all be built in the Birmingham conurbation is just foolishness.
Report abuse
“not when Telford as a whole has to have about 30,000 by 2026″
HAS TO HAVE ?? This sickening certainty again – the housing need presented as a ‘fait accompli’
We don’t HAVE to have ANY more houses. Who says we need these houses ? Why ? What are the assumptions based on ? Are we going to carry on building for ever ? Is an ever-increasing population a good idea ? When do we stop ?
WAKE UP AND FIGHT
Report abuse