700 tonnes of Easter egg packaging to be cut
Wednesday 18th March 2009, 12:01AM GMT.
Plastic packaging on Easter eggs this year is set to be cut by at least 700 tonnes in response to consumer concern over plastic waste.
Confectionary firm Nestle, which has a 14 per cent market share of the chocolate Easter egg market, says it will cut packaging on 80 per cent of its eggs.
Overall 30 per cent of packaging will be cut, resulting in at least 100 double-decker buses worth of material being saved.
Both the Local Government Association (LGA) and Waste and Resource Action Programme (Wrap) have criticised retailers for wasteful packaging.
Wrap’s Laura Underwood welcomed Nestle’s move, which will also result in around 200 fewer lorry journeys.
“The work Nestle is doing to reduce Easter egg packaging will cut waste by 700 tonnes this year,” she said.
“This will make a huge amount of difference to the amount of rubbish going into landfill this Easter.”
David Rennie, manager director at Nestle Confectionery, commented: “By removing plastic and providing recycling advice on the remaining packaging we hope we’ve made it easier for consumers to do their bit for the environment.”
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
GREAT NEWS
Report abuse
IM STILL BOYCOTTING THEM (for selling powdered milk to starving african women who would have been better off breast feeding)
Report abuse
damn these ec regulations which burden our businesses
Report abuse
am i bovered?
about this
no
Report abuse
looks like Veolia wont have anything left to burn soon then? No need for the incinerator then
Report abuse
good
Report abuse