She slimed him…

Friday 6th March 2009, 10:25AM GMT.

Can’t see video? Update Adobe Flash Player
Video may take a moment to load. Return to Video Index

You have to feel some sympathy for Peter Mandelson, writes blogger David Banner. No, seriously, you do. (I know it isn’t easy, but you have to. Well, at least give it a go. Go on … Oh, all right then, can you at least try a sympathetic expression?)

There he was, innocently arriving at the Government’s low carbon economy summit in London when a climate change protester stepped forward and threw a cup of green slime over him.

She was from the group Plane Stupid, which is against a third runway at Heathrow Airport.

According to reports Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, met lobbyists from Heathrow owner BAA before the Government gave the third runway its blessing.

The environmental protesters say Mandelson attending a climate change meeting after his government approved another runway is an insult.

So, as Mandy got out of his ministerial car, the Plane Stupid protester walked up to him and threw a cup of what she called “green slime.” He didn’t stand a chance.

Afterwards she calmly walked away, although she did leave the watching reporters a dream quote: “The only thing green about Peter Mandelson is the slime coursing through his veins.”

So far, so funny.

But isn’t really very funny, is it? What if she’d had something more sinister in that cup? Something really nasty? Then where would we be?

Now you could argue that she should have used democratic means to get her view across. She could have waved a placard or handed out leaflets. Of course, because of our jaded news media, that wouldn’t have given her a lot of airtime.

Alternatively, you could argue that ours is a Government which just isn’t very good at listening to public opinion. There was massive unhappiness at the Heathrow proposal, and they ignored it. One million people marched through London in opposition to the Iraq war, and they ignored it. How else do you make your voice heard?

And you could say that stunts like this do more harm than good. People simply turn away from such actions.

The fact is, elected politicians have the right to go about their business without people throwing things at them (yes, I know Mandelson wasn’t elected, but bear with me). Throwing things does not enhance your cause. In fact, it does quite the opposite.

Remember when John Prescott, quite magnificently, punched a man for throwing an egg at him? Quite right too.

However, we don’t want to see Mandelson reaching for a bucket of Dulux’s finest Raspberry Delight the next time someone decides to take matters into their own hands.

So, could we agree that Plane Stupid and their ilk will not do it again?

And in return, can Mandelson and co agree to actually listen to the people?


  1. 1
    H. St. John Peasbody

    This woman should be birched in public as punishment for this attack.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Hilary

    A few centuries ago it was throwing rotten tomatoes and eggs at people in the stocks.

    Now the peasants are revolting and getting their own back ;)

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Rodney Nosnail

    When government disenfranchises the people, the people must resort to extraordinary measures to remind government that it is servant to the people, not master. If the expression of disenfranchisement is only made with green custard, ministers should regard themselves as fortunate – for the time being.

    We should take heart – they’ve spent billions in labelling us all as terrorists, creating a surveillance state where data and DNA are routinely gathered (and lost), and they STILL can’t stop a minister being covered in green custard.

    Oh, and yes – a little correction to the BBC: in the subsequent interview with Leila Deen, you stated that Mandelson was “democratically elected” and this his decisions thus reflected the peoples’ will. NO! Mandleson was NOT elected – he was appointed in a rush by Gordon Brown to the House of Lords so that he could be part of government. In other words, totally *UN*elected and *UN*democratic – a common factor when looking at the way that Labour currently operate.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Capt Chaos

    “She was from the group Plane Stupid” yep sounds like a good description for the woman who threw the custard! imagine if she tried that in America? probably get shot!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Stuart

    Totally agree H Sinjun. My personal opinion of Mandelson is unprintable but a more outrageous act is hard to think of. This woman has previous form for public attention seeking and she should not be allowed to get away with it.
    I must admit that I had some sympathy with those who disagreed with another runway at Heathrow – but if this woman is an example of those either running the group or those who sympathise with it, they can count me out. If this woman’s actions was an example of their judgement and behaviour, their case must be wrong. I bet many others who saw this young idiot also think the same. She has done her case no good at all.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Huw Peach

    If readers want to oppose the expansion of Heathrow, they can join the ‘Greenpeace plot’, which is easy to find using Google.

    Ordinary members of the public, concerned about climate change, can add their name to the list of owners of a plot of land in the middle of the proposed Heathrow site.

    It is totally free to do this, and visibly adds your opposition to the biggest expansion of aviation in a generation.

    Please don’t spank me for holding this opinion and writing this, Harold.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Sara

    i dont like labour but its out of order to do this really, as its been said, could have been acid, could have caused a sniper to shoot her, anything could have happened,

    not good, the man was trying to be green at a conference looking into green economics, and these plane stupid people are just that

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    mea culpa

    its not clever and i think its right that we expand heathrow for the sake of the economy

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Huw Peach

    Professor Stern called climate change ‘the biggest market failure in history’.

    Who is acting for the sake of our grandchildren’s economy, mea culpa?

    Taxpayers are already supporting the aviation industry to the tune of an estimated £13 billion a year in subsidies and hidden costs.

    The aviation industry doesn’t pay tax on aviation fuel or VAT.

    Could mea culpa explain how ordinary taxpayers, living through difficult economic times, where thousands are losing their jobs every week, will benefit from the expansion of an industry, which cannot possibly be described as ‘sustainable’ by any stretch of the imagination?

    Surely our tax money should be used in ways which benefit our society and put our econmy onto a sustainable footing.

    Let’s instead invest in a Green New Deal.

    For the sake of the economy.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.