Protest over workers’ rights
Wednesday 4th March 2009, 1:30PM GMT.

The protestors at Fruit of the Loom House, Halesfield 10, make their point over working conditions in Honduras.
Students played dead in front of a Telford building to protest about the alleged repression of workers thousands of miles away.
Protesters dressed in see-through hooded jumpsuits laid down in the pouring rain to be symbolically crushed by giant fruit outside Fruit of the Loom’s UK headquarters in Halesfield, to highlight conditions in a Honduras factory.
But the company’s European boss insisted he knew nothing about the claims and issued a statement in which the company denied any wrongdoing.
One of the students read aloud a letter from Honduran trade unionists accusing the company of “unethical and inhumane” actions destroying the livelihood of 1,800 workers and their families.
It was part of an international boycott campaign in schools, universities and colleges to protest about conditions at a Honduran clothing factory owned by the Russell Corporation, a Fruit of the Loom subsidary.
Campaigners claim trade unionists there face death threats, targeted dismissal and eventual closure of the factory. Jim Cranshaw, one of the 20 students who took part in the protest, said: “Fruit of the Loom is a big supplier of clothing to the National Union of Students and we want to see its products boycotted.”
Len Marbury, Fruit of the Loom Europe chief executive, who was at the Telford base yesterday, said: “This is the first we have heard about this issue. We know nothing about it.”
His staff did, however, hand out a statement from Fruit of the Loom USA saying it was taking the international concerns of students seriously but adding the company was proud of its employment record in Honduras.
It denied the closure was anything to do with unionisation at the plant, insisting it was due to the global slump.
By Peter Johnson
Shropshire Star on Twitter
Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
Entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new Shropshire Star app
Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
I work with Russell, and I’d like to respond to the false accusation that we closed this plant because it was unionized. We had already recognized this plant’s union status for more than a year before announcing the closure. The Fair Labor Association, as well as an independent report it commissioned both agreed: it was imperative for us to close one of our three plants in Honduras because of the global economic slowdown. The independent report also confirmed the two reasons why we chose this plant in particular: 1) The need for products sewn there was lower than any of our other factories in Honduras. And 2) it was the only one with a lease we could vacate immediately, which saved us $2 million.
Those who are taking deliberate and unjustified actions to hurt Russell’s business and reputation cannot be acting in the best interests of Honduran workers who depend on Russell for their livelihood. If you’d like to know more about how we treat our workers, please visit http://www.russellsocialresponsibility.com/. And if you’d like to read the independent report, please visit http://www.fairlabor.org/images/NewsandPublications/NewsReleasesandStatements2008/NewsReleasesandStatements2009/jerzees_de_honduras_hq_investigation_oct_2008.pdf.
Report abuse
Nope, the factory was closed because of the union. The reports from the FLA, which its summary glossed over (Goldin’s report, which also debunks other FLA reports), confirm this, as does the report by the Workers Rights Consortium.
-United Students Against Sweatshops member at Pennsylvania State University
Report abuse