Worries raised over burner plan

Friday 16th January 2009, 6:00PM GMT.

Concerns over the risks to livestock and crops from a proposed £60 million incinerator in Shrewsbury have been raised at a public exhibition as residents caught their first glimpse of what the burner will look like.

David Jagger, who runs a farm and heritage centre with his family close to where the incinerator would be built if plans are approved, said he had grave fears over his site which he believed could be damaged by harmful emissions.

Residents also said they were worried about how Veolia’s plans for an energy from waste burner at Battlefield would affect future generations.

But some people at the exhibition at the Battlefield Recycling Centre yesterday said they were behind the plans, adding that something needed to be done to tackle the amount of waste from the county going to landfill.

Mr Jagger, 60, said he was worried about the safety of his 650 sheep and 200 cattle.

“We are very concerned about the emissions and long term effect on our farm resulting from these emissions which they are pretty vague about,” he said.

“The biggest concern is the long term effect on our farm land and livestock, people living over here and my young grandson.”

Dorothy Dodds, 75, a parish councillor in Astley, near Shrewsbury, said she was not totally against moves for an incinerator but believed the current proposal was too close to a residential area.

She said: “We can’t keep putting it in the ground can we? But I am not sure this is the right place for it. I’m not worried for myself as I am too old but my fear is for future generations, our grandchildren and great-grandchildren are the ones who are going to suffer if anybody does.”

But Graham Holt, 51, of Craven Arms, said he was not unduly worried about the health risks and just wanted to find out more about it.

Husband and wife Bob and Sue Udy of Clive, near Shrewsbury, said they were probably in favour of the incinerator but also wanted to quiz Veolia managers about some issues.

John Collis, specialist for Veolia, said that he understood people’s concerns but said many fears over health risks were unfounded.

He said the firm had been “inundated” with people coming to see the plans during the exhibition.

The plans can be seen again today from 3pm to 7pm and tomorrow between 9.30am and 1pm at The Lantern, Meadow Farm Drive.


  1. 1
    Michael Ryan

    John Collis claims that “many fears over health risks were unfounded”.

    Can he please list the fears that he considers to be unfounded and also the ones which are presumably well-founded?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Michael Ryan

    Why haven’t the Environment Agency commented on the health effects of incineration?

    They’ve had nearly thirteen years to examine health and mortality data around incinerators and yet for each new application they ask the local Primary Care Trust.

    Either incinerators are safe or they are not. So why hasn’t the Environment Agency found out yet?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    green guru

    we all need to recycle more instead, this is a total waste of energy, we could save more energy more jobs and more cash by recycling more

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    mr J

    green guru, this is recycling, not everything can be recycled, this plant burns your waste and turns it into energy! Like I saaid in pervious comments, an incinerator turns waste into CLEAN ENERGY, the smoke and everything else gets cleaned out and waste gases are bottled for heat customers, is everyone going to moan about the 2 hospitials incinerators, residents live near them, the goverment are trying to help here by cutting our energy bills in half. Coventry has a waste to energy incinerator and no one has complained about that, they have had it since 1975.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Mr Dave

    I find it hard to believe that there is no health risk! Most of the waste which is not being recycled is plastic. i.e platic bottles and containers. Just set fire to one and see the result!

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    mr J

    Mr Dave, when you burn plastic it burns with a black smoke, but in a proper controlled enviroment where the smoke is cleaned and filtered it is completely safe. This is the problem, people just think they get the rubbish and burn it like a bonfire but there wrong, it is all filtered and gasses are botteled and metals are seperated with a powerful magnet and recycled. type in Coventry incinerator into a search engine, they have a website which explains the full process, if needed vist the plant and speak to someone, all incinerators operate the same and to strict guidelines.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Mark

    do you not trust the government agencies to regulate big business in the interests of our health and best interests? You cynical lot :)

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    gh

    dont believe the hype

    its only equivelent to having a BBQ or a bonfire in the back garden

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    Michael Ryan

    How does Mr J know whether or not anyone has complained about the Coventry incinerator?

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Michael Ryan

    Has gh any evidence that incinerator emissions are equivalent to having a BBQ or a bonfire in tbe back garden?

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    Rpt Barrington-Black

    I have asked in other posts for Mr Ryan to provide details of any case in which a owner or operator has been successfully sued for “harm” caused by an incinerator.

    So far he failed to provide details of a single case.

    Courts will evaluate the evidence and the science not the nonsense mr Ryan spouts.

    Come on Mr Ryan, tell us of one case.

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    mr J

    Michael Ryan, if there were complaints do you not think they will have closed it down by now, the houses near the incinerator are all occupied and residents have been living there for years, infact, they own the houses.

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    Ryan

    Michael, in response to number 10, have a look at the following link
    http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3106039.stm

    Here the BBC state that:
    ‘researchers also found that the average concentrations of dioxins in the vicinity of the barbecue ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 nannograms per cubic metre – up to seven times higher than the level authorised for public incinerators at the point of discharge from the chimney’.

    I think this puts dioxin emmissions into context quite nicely. This means that even if you were floating over the top of the chimney, and the incinerator was running at the maximum permited level (which the generally dont) then your still 6-7 times safer than if you were standing near a BBQ.

    crazy, huh.

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    Huw Peach

    Mr J, to respond to #12, everyone can see there have been complaints here in Shropshire.

    http://www.shropshirestar.com/2008/12/03/mps-survey-reveals-79-against-burner/

    Does that mean they won’t build the incinerators here?

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    Huw Peach

    Ryan, what you omitted to say about the BBC report, which I have just read, is that Robin des Bois, the French NGO warning about dioxin poisoning from barbecues, are also campaigning against incinerators in France.

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    Ryan

    hi Huw, i didnt know that, but does this mean they their priority is to ban BBQ’s first?

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

TWITTER

Shropshire Star on Twitter Shropshire Star on Twitter

Keep updated with the latest breaking news and content on our Twitter feed.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Shropshire Star and Express & Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

Entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new Shropshire Star app Get the new Shropshire Star app

Download the Shropshire Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.